>>332685
>The flaw here is you can actually dig into details and specifics and they break down your abstractions to falsities.
This reply can be used in almost any argument ever without actually having an argument that is above 'ur wrong'. It's not even an argument, it equates to 'ur wrong'. You realize that you're being a bad 'faith' nigger, right? Only a naive child thinks life has a point above efficiency and power struggles, that and the religious/delusional, of which there is little difference psychologically. For any religious perspective you can in good 'faith', albiet an ironic way to convey the message grammatically, calling it good 'faith', even the word good being ambigious and all: "The flaw here is you can actually dig into details and specifics and they break down your faith into delusions." I'd barely have to change it to make it fit perfectly, except I'm not a faggot and I'd go and bring up god being malelovent rather than benevolent and shit like with that one Luke quote about your needing to hate your entire family to be Jesus's desciple. Luke 14 26? That and logically if god is all powerful but also good he'd not make Satan, not make humans imperfect, would not be wrathful and thus a hypocrit, etc. American patriotism also comes to mind, what with how they walk over every single 10 emendments of the 'bill of rights'. I won't bother right now, but they do, e