>>233049
What? The whole image looks fake, her eyes and ears look fucked, her eyes have random lines attached to them that the bot probably thought were eye brows, and her eye lashes are made of 3D material like in a video game.
Her skin is blurry imaginary material like in photoshop porn from the 2000s, made for stupid people, which even if it perfectly generated a photo of someone and then did that burring effect after, would look fake in the end result.
You have to be dead autistic to zoom in on her mouth given all that and say "how utterly unrealistic" her lips are due to some defect that one would have to squint to distinguish from just the edge of her lips touching or some image artifact like tard above said. This is the most stupid post I've ever read.
On top of it, you are one of those retards who sees each AI innovation get better and better and responds "NO!!! STILL COMPLETELY FAKE!", but you're so tunnel visioned that you only focus on some small some weird issue when the fakeness is just obvious to anyone and didn't need to be said. Like if that lip defect wasn't there you would then be convinced the image is real then make up some reason why it isn't that doesn't include any of the obvious points I listed, then tell people and yourself about it.
She's also average and the poster calls her "beauty", giving away that he's a troll yet you still argue with it like your life depends on it.