I'm not left nor right, not conservative nor liberal, not trad not prog, and not Republican nor Democrat.
The Nazis reject me, so do the libertarians. My political views are a mixed bag of ideas from various political ideologies, with heavy modifications of my own made to them
My political views start out sounding libertarian, but take a turn that most libertarians wouldn't support, but that doesn't mean the natsocs or whitenats would be okay with me, either.
Start with a night watchman minarchist state (the people are not given any rights because they are by default free to do anything they want except break the laws, and the government is by default not allowed to do anything except what is strictly necessary to preserve itself from threats and to minimize the number of times when its laws are broken), the principle of nonaggression being the only laws (do not interact with the persons/bodies or property/belongings of others without having their informed voluntary and unrevoked consent to the interaction, additionally all eligible citizens must pay their taxes when they are due), and the georgian lvt (a percentage of the lands value being taken as a taxation, in exchange for the taxpayer being able to vote in elections, I'd also like to make front line service in the military or police or emergency response be a requirement for purchasing or holding land), and elections being held by a voting process I approve of (one that sees voters rank all candidates in order of preference on a ballot, being able to assign the same rank to multiple candidates, or to leave any candidate unranked, and then the count begins to find out who has the least first place rankings, and they will be removed from the running and stricken from all ballots, bumping up any candidates below them whenever their removal creates an empty space on the ballots rankings, and the process is repeated until only one candidate remains, who is crowned the winner).
But then wed ask the question who should be counted as a member of the people? To whom or to what should the NAP be applicable? And there I've decided that only those with at least one Y-chromosome in their DNA, low eumelanin levels in their skin, hair, and eyes, and are old enough to be capable of having biological children of their own should be considered human by the state/government and have the laws be applicable to them. White females in particular should be dejure outlawed and defacto enslaved, being reduced to chattel property to belong to white men (such as their fathers, brothers, sons, uncles, cousins, nephews, or other male relatives, until the ownership of them is transferred to another white man who becomes their new owners, aka their husbands). Also Democrat supporting white boys should spend their childhoods learning how to be warriors, as the most important jobs in any society have historically been the warrior caste of police and militia, violence is the most essential atomic element of all society and civilization.. Lastly I'd like to make an additional law that has a penal colony established somewhere only for those men who either have had sex with another male of any age or species (sex being defined as any act that may transmit diseases through bodily fluids such as saliva or sexual fluids), as sending the faggots away would cause them to come volunteer to be banished into exile rather than drive them deeper underground and having them hide out among us like a cancerous tumor waiting to spread. Also I'd like to have a royal family above the ministers who would hold veto power over anything they could do (but cannot initiate any action on their own). Kings and emperors are great and we wouldn't need to worry about queens.
When the 4chan hack occurred in 2025 and we discovered it was getting a majority of its posts from isreal ips beginning in 2014. Confirming the common claim that 4chans good /b/ years were the decade from 03 to 13. Now everyone using it is newfag cancer.
Here's some for you: a cogitation on ethics and morality.
- What makes something good or evil?