Literally all of the arguments people come up with against children voting were used back in the 1910s for women. And you know, they were right. Women are less mature than men on average. Look at how men tend to prioritize real political issues like the economy while women tend to prioritize emotional ones like abortion.
Yeah, children would do the exact same thing. So why should we allow children to vote? Well, it's fair. If women can vote, children should vote too. Children are probably more moral than women anyway.
But more importantly, since the regime has stated that its goal is to get every featherless biped to vote, why not be logically consistent and lower the voting minimum age to 2. Then we will expose democracy for what it truly is: A joke.
>"But children are not mature enough to make decisions that affect everyone!"
You will hear. Yet most adults are not mature enough either. Why let them vote?
>"But children will just be manipulated by schools and media."
So are adults. Yet we let them vote.
The ONLY reason we do not allow children to vote is because doing so exposes how clownish this system is. It is an arbitrary barrier we adults impose to make ourselves feel like we have earned something just because we get one day every 2 years where we go through a ritual that ultimately affects no change. What would even change if we did allow children to vote? Nothing.
Gerrymandered congressional districts would still keep your despised rulers in power. The presidential selection would still lead to a contest between two party machines. Hell, I bet Trump would have won anyway since he is cool while Kamala is not.
You STILL wouldn't affect legislation since that is done at the congressional level.
You STILL wouldn't have any meaningful impact upon who runs this country because this joke we do every 2-4 years isn't even a real democracy. It is a sham.