>>59834
nigger, gynocentrism is a problem but in general that's at most a confidence problem, aside from that, women who follow that rat race are very socialized and is even more related to that type of society, it is obvious that biology can convey some aspects, but there's a point where someone likes confidence or masculinity and another being a drop down bitch who falls with retards (people that aren't logical at his own stake of survival and social construction, but imbeciles).
Obviously simping is wrong, but it is because it just makes a cycle instead of being a commandment of nature, even more when is very controlled to get some specific behavior through people to get them to follow a system.
Even more when a lot of those tests of iq are very flawed and used small studies or universities, even more when they have very controlled variables to match an specific model instead of showing results hand to hand
see: >>59798
I know that i can have some biases related to this kind of stuff, but i have lived on areas where this doesn't happen, i understand that social context from 1st world countries can change or skew those statistics, but aside from that i can use this as a rebuttal
Even then, children and sex aren't uncompatible or bad perse, it's more like the development of toxic relationships which can seem to show those problems on the f