>>252140
I've been thinking about this for months. Why is it that men have such visceral instinctual rage at women domineering over them and demeaning them? Stuff like men belong in mines, should be cannon fodder, mocking their low chances of ever winning a fair divorce case, that they need to be enslaved and made subservient uneducated brutes, they're all evil and want to abuse the weak, so on. Because they're right? Because it's insulting? Because we're insecure? Because it could happen? Because it's emasculation? Because it's just pertinent? Take your picks, the truth of those is personal.
I think the notion is supported by something deeper, that there is a core instinct of pre-historic tyrannical violent matriarchy enforced by torture and ganging that every man's blood is activated by through those things that say. That matriarchal enslavement and idol worship is a natural lowly state of humanity/civilization of the forever mommy that was broken by the males who stood up to and, say, no longer needed mommy and overthrew the opposite sex by making them in turn socially subservient. The historias obscuras of what is now Ukraine spoke of such a civilization. The peoples of the South Orkney Islands that worshiped a goddess of fire and death that the Yaghan spoke of with hatred. How some cultures in the prosperous and intelligent land of Africa are run by women. Since feminism we've been creeping back slowly to this state one example being male enforcers; how they'll jump to defend women no matter what or shaming each other for not falling in line with the status quo like finding marriage to non-virgins disgusting or anything else biased and unfair in the female's favor. And now with how they behave without any restrictions or rearing we're seeing what could be called their true nature: promiscuous, entitled, volatile, dishonest, self-centered, varying degrees of uncouth, even sadistic depending on the person.
When I first concluded this hypothesis it pushed me further away then I already was with them now being a malicious force of nature, only given quarter because of biology pertaining to coitus and how adept they are at manipulation. And I don't consider myself a real misogynist. Someone who actually hates women coming to the same conclusion would make alpha male grifters look milquetoast in their opinions on females. With that I think it's right to be afraid of and take them seriously as threats, and to take note of their ticks and deeds so that they can be justly recompensated. The powerful and the strong =/= the fittest.