>>17930
>I already mentioned there will be false positives, if what you say is true. I've also added that this is done as a blackbox, with zero access to tools to determine it with complete certainty (nor has any mod or janny assisted me). If your posts ended up here, then you coincidentally matched his exact talking points / vocabulary / shared I.P.'s with a VPN or Tor. Glowroom, nevertheless, has a distinct pattern of talking points -- and I've collected far more / seen more than this for the project which were not cited. This was done in a hurry, by a volunteer, with no outside assistance against potentially full-time workers, teams, and bots for three years with all the resources in the world.
The activity of this board is not worthy of bots or even more elaborate tools. You'd know that if you pulled your head out of your asshole. Shovelware bots wake up on boards automatically as soon as their respective PPH rates go suddenly up, but the content they deliver is often terrible for the most part. That's because there's not much use doing more until this low pulse place somewhat manages to reach the not-so-great but still higher activity level of oc or that wretched degenerate place that mixes zoophilia and ns.
>The charges that I selected based on material I dislike are false, as I've freely attacked anyone I thought was wrong on matters (or defended them if their reasoning was sound). I've even defended what I am 99.5% confident are Glownigger posts or at least added onto them / mentioned them later. I've called Orlog a nigger very likely over his views (and many others I determined to be legitimate) on specific topics, and I've quarreled with him plenty on things I strongly believe him to be misinformed or wrong on. Your charges do not hold water.
Maybe, maybe not. Nobody can know that for sure, you could be making shit up on top of the shit you naturally produce. There are posts you flagged which are mine, as I said, and they never were met with any counter-argument. Claiming a win or some rhetorical superiority the way you do is highly dishonest. Considering the way you're treating those posts I have the feeling that it would be an exercise in futility to expect any discussion done in good faith from you, and frankly this board is not important enough for me to bother either.
>Completely invented out of thin air.
I quoted you retard. It's in your whiny gay list, that very point and all the others that show that you take the side of shooters, yet you're denouncing people who don't shoot at cops. There, here's your contradiction. You couldn't even properly address the point made about dealing with cops because the anon you put in your baby list had a solid point: you engage cops only when you really need to, and much better targets are not as protected as most people think they are. Case in point, Luigi (cited only because of the nature of the target, not the method used).
>I am not into saints
Really? Here, again, from your list:
>>Against lone wolf or single operator activities; eschews violence.
The term lone wolf is always and only used for the saints here, never for anything else. You would know that if you weren't some witless tourist.
>>Zero ability to upload or post any documented universally despised / reviled and globally-acknowledged illegal behavior of jews, in clear print and quality and citation, especially ones which reflect poorly on all jews in the eyes of the vast majority of the planet from all political spectrums.
So you're that dingus too I see.
>>Creating cells or decentralized organizational structures for guerilla warfare must be prevented. Even concepts which can be used equally between independent cells and smaller teams part of an actual organized / above-ground and public organization are specifically and genuinely condemned and discouraged (and not for legal reasons).
Geez it's like you never paid attention to the points made. History is conspicuously devoid of any shred of recorded evidence that some totally decentralized mist of cells has ever been done or even worked. Not a single guerilla has ever been waged by a single iteration of that kind of mythical army type you keep dreaming of. Not a single one. It's like people taking the concept of leaderless resistance literally, they don't get it don't they? The point is not to have no leader whatsoever because that's truly stupid beyond belief: it's to have a method of organization that prevents external powers from knowing who does what and who the leaders are, no matter who gets captured. Because whether you like it or not at some point you will be part of a network, with decision takers and followers.