/tech/ - Technology

>>6092
Please post it.

>>6495
philosophically illiterate post

>>6525
>everything I disagree is philosophically illiterate
Are you so philosophically illiterate that you can't even explain why you disagree with anything?

Bumperino!

>>13141
Ask ChatGPT to do it for you. I post the plus version in the other thread. Mostly likely have to debug yourself, but at least that’s something.

planes_and_shit.jpg
[Hide] (32.9KB, 680x476)

This code is highly niggerlicious.

>vlc
>android

>>11176
Proof?

>>9977
>actual prophecies
what can you prove it predicted without resorting to Revelations-tier interpretations?

creepy-rena-kys.png
[Hide] (14.9KB, 74x86)

>>11176
>>11181
Blasphemers against King Terry get the rope

>>4939 (OP) 
He couldn't share the source code because it was totally incomprehnsible and kill anyone who looked upon it, for it was directly the untranslated unadulterated word of God.
You see, as a music producer he had sold his soul to the Devil. Not metaphorically. Literally. When he dedicated himself to Judaism, he suddenly wanted to get his soul back, and so he made a deal with God, who would pluck his soul from Satan's ruddy claws, in exchange for him distributing his teachings to a wayward flock.

cf8fb2f72f466c4225ea21de546e12e6.jpg
[Hide] (4.8MB, 2160x2780)

Can't make this shit up.

KISS, just make spamming expensive. Ban any subnet that spams, and then reject all emails from them with a note that says they have to pay to get unbanned.

>>13000
I doubt spammers are using some kind of content analysis tools to find email addresses because nobody really hides them like that, at most people add spaces or parentheses around @ or replace it with "(at)" or something. I've seen a few websites that put their email onto an image.

I think sharing the contact address indirectly is very powerful at stopping the vast majority if not all bot spam, but it'll only work as long as it's unpopular so it's not any kind of final solution to spam. Replacing the "@" and "." with images would probably be enough too, it's unlikely that any bot is smart enough to figure out there's an email there unless they render the whole page and use an image-to-text converter on that (which they might start doing if everyone starts obscuring their addresses).

There are some very advanced techniques to del with spam. Take a look at rspamd, you can use bayes classifier https://rspamd.com/doc/configuration/statistic.html and even neural network https://rspamd.com/doc/modules/neural.html to deal with spam.
With how llms are popular today, I am surprised that it is not commonly done.

>>13004
There's way too many people, even in business settings, who speak like troglodytes, and chat bots are indistinguishable from humans at this point. I don't see how analyzing sentence structure can detect a bot for that reason. AI may be able to do something but I'm not very confident about it because a lot of spam mail sound very similar some kind of business offers, who knows though.

1709159499183-tegaki.png
[Hide] (11.7KB, 500x500)

That's what happens when you put your email address somewhere where it can be scrapped or give it to a company that sells it.
There is no solution to that if you want a permanent address inbox open to anyone.

You could regularly change the public address while staying connected with important people with SimpleX which I made a thread about but nobody is gonna use that just to write some stranger one message. I could be wrong though.

So there you go. It's gonna stay fucked.
I receive no sms spam though. Probably because it costs money to send them or because I haven't given it to any shitty websites nor posted on the web.

As others said, putting it in an image is probably a good solution.
Maybe put it vertically in the image and make @ larger, so it can't be ocr'd as easily.

>>12921
Is that not just dead internet theory? Endless bots serving to create narratives out of thin air? How do we even counteract something like that other than giving up on the internet entirely?

>>12922
This sounds like it's more adaptive and also targets problematic users for shadowbanning. So like instead of having a bunch of fact-checkers running a counter-narrative and at the same time pumping them up in search engines, they just straight up eliminate the opposing side altogether before they can communicate and replace them with kosher bots (so that the social media doesn't become eerily silent).

>>12922
>How do we even counteract something like that
One thing is proof of work. Make it easy to post at a human pace but sending 1000 posts per second becomes computationally expensive. Another thing is reputation systems. Everyone has a public-private key and software to filter out posts signed by known bot keys or only show posts signed by keys you trust or trusted by keys you trust. With zero knowledge proofs you can also do this in a way that nobody can enumerate all your posts and attribute them to your key.

>>12922
> How do we even counteract something like that other than giving up on the internet entirely?
Not sure, maybe isolated intranets that vet users or something. I think Tor/i2p/freenet may become the only kind of option soon.

>>12922
>giving up on the internet entirely
>implying there is anything on the internet worth not giving up on
Think about why does a person uses the internet. Roughly speaking it is to exchange information. Information including news, political views, memes, private messages, etc. Where do they come from? Who compose the majority of the other end of any information exchange?
Assume that bots and AIs are not already flooding the Internet, that is to say most other users are humans. Most humans are normalfags. Since the Internet getting popular, most places gone to shit because of normalfags. One reason normalfags turn everything to shit because they are inherently more socialized, which means they are more affected by social norms and peer pressure. Even without AI, the ((( media ))) has been pumping normalfags full of degeneration, niggerloving and other literal faggot crap. The so-called culture war.
But there was never any war, it is just replacement of any resemblance of anything nice into jewish bullshit. The game was rigged from the start. It is similar to white replacement, free-thinkers and based individuals are being drown out by the sheer number of normalfags, with more and more newfags (migrants) invading from all parts of the Internet. The September that never ended.
As for the stragglers, we are ge

I've always wanted to reverse engineer older games to port them to modern OSs, this thread will come in handy when I finally make that leap.
Anyone ITT tried that?

>>12244
No, but I have seen a few games de-compiled for that purpose. I think a few people did it for Mario 64 and now you can run it natively on linux.

>>12253
Mario 64 has been fully decompiled and ported to other OSs, I did compile it and run it natively on my Linux machine. Zelda OoT has also been fully decompiled but was not ported to other OSs, perhaps there's potential for a project there...

>>12265
Have you seen the Banjo Kazooie decompilation project?

>>9839
>This release incorporates several changes that are incompatible with the previous version. Therefore, it is recommended to do a clean install.
The version number doesn't reflect that though, are you using semver?

>>9839
Does anybody use the software?

>>9846
>are you using semver
Doubtful.

>>9852
Yes and the public kiosk is only a portion of the communication that happens over bitchan. I run the software locally and have access to boards that don't appear on the kiosk mentioned on the github.

>>9862
>Doubtful
You should: https://semver.org/

this shit should have use i2p for in-between bitchan instances messaging and message routing.

afaik, bitmessage's message routing stuff sucks ass, offers no untraceability.

>>12238 (OP) 
Anyone using onion should be aware about the risks. This isn't a particular new idea

>privacy-conscious technology board devolves into grifting and scamming 
Lame.

Back to the topic of minimalism, I had this idea of bootstrapping a minimal linux userland without any GNU tools. I was (partially) successful by using projects from the BSD/Android worlds:

-- toybox:		provides a shell (sh) + coreutils (cp,ls,mv,mkdir...etc) + gunzip/bunzip
-- oksh:		OpenBSD ksh ported to linux, much more powerful than toybox sh
-- sbase:		from suckless.org, provides expr and tr which are missing from toybox
-- bsdgrep:		FreeBSD grep ported to linux
-- oyacc:		OpenBSD yacc ported to linux
-- awk:			the "One True Awk" (build with oyacc instead of GNU bison)
-- curl:		alternative to wget (and toybox wget which doesn't work)
-- zig cc/c++:	the Zig compiler bundles clang, letting you compile C/C++ without an SDK
-- pdpmake:		general POSIX make tool with some GNU extensions
-- jlibtool:	alternative to libtool (not properly tested yet)
-- minlzma:		provides minlzdec for decompressing xz archives
-- cedit:		zero dependency TUI editor similar to nano

>>12069
While I get most GNU software is bloated, is there any reason why?

>>12074
>why?
The main reason for me is the L/GPL. I can't e.g. statically link GCC and distribute it, or statically link my program to glibc and release it, because that would be against the license... Other reasons include bloat, difficulty of compilation, "debatable" standards conformance, and monopoly over the FOSS world. GNU software harms the software development ecosystem as much as it benefits it, so I'm looking for alternatives.

>>12069
>curl
Use tnftp.
>>12075
Poor code quality is also a common issue with GNU programs.

>>8311
> I shouldn't reinvent the hammer every time
You invent it once and then you use it every time you need it. Are you just deleting your code after every use?

>>11847
At that point just run Slackware or Guix or whatever, why bother?

I have a VM with OmniOS and pkgsrc. Better than Linux, but then, so is almost every other OS.

ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (26.9KB, 1104x159)

ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (11KB, 948x57)

ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (69.5KB, 708x457)

>>4842
>The glibc ABI is stable on Linux, anything built targeting an older version will reliably work on a newer version.
https://github.com/ValveSoftware/Proton/issues/6051
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129358
https://abi-laboratory.pro/?view=timeline&l=glibc

>>12059
>program uses library in ways not specified by the documentation
>update changes implementation details
ABI still not broken.

>>12060
>>program uses library in ways not specified by the documentation
Where is the documentation for DT_GNU_HASH? And what standard says it's the default symbol table?
https://blog.hiler.eu/win32-the-only-stable-abi/
>ABI still not broken.
<all those symbols removed in nearly every glibc version
Here's a (You) for effort

>>12062
>Where is the documentation for DT_GNU_HASH
Exactly. It's an implementation detail. Go back to Windows, proprietary boy/