>>11960
>>11967
>>11968
I spent my entire morning and half my lunch reading through this video to commentate on it: I've dealt with wifi and played with radio stuff before.
Raw Commentary
==Off the cuff, ==
1. If you're afraid of getting bombarded with RF radiation from 5G towers, get a house that has it's walls with a faraday cage built into it. Even chicken-wire fences would work.
2. Microwaves are more damaging if they're focused (Masers or dish antennas) rather than radial transmissions (monopole/dipole antennas).
3. The Nocebo effect is vastly-more-damaging than most tech-ops, people can lie to you and you feel bad because you believe it's bad for you.
4. Do you have a microwave oven? If yes, it runs VERY close to but not at the frequencies that wireless routers do. Do you feel anything when it runs? Did you feel it BEFORE I asked this question? Is your mind not making shit up to make you scared?
5. Light believe it or not, has an RF frequency, I can't remember off the cuff if it's Terhertz or higher, but yes, light has a frequency.
6. Binaural beats are ACTUAL brain-hacking type shit. the thing is, these require that you actually can hear the waves in the first place. Furthermore, headphones are really the only practical way to make binaural beats work.
==Commentary with specific timestamps==
0:20 - This already smells like fluff, or shit that cult leaders use to get people to believe shit that isn't actually true. Furthermore, I would like to point out that the speaker is from the "Hebrew University Hadassah Medical School" ...and the concern here is allegedy about microwave RF emmissions and not liars.
1:17 - Smoking comparison... Ehhh... You could say the same thing about any sort of physical drug though. More fluff. Also, '''people aren't willingly taking in microwaves to get fucking high.'''
4:48 - "...basically says 'don't keep the phone in your pocket',". Not really that. It's actually a legal ramble about RF radiation transmission and absorbtage that goes over the heads of people that aren't radio engineers, hell, I'd have to read more to really go through the moonspeak of the phone's formula legalese. Doctor-lady is kinda stretching things here, and that sounds dumb if not deceptive.
5:25 - the info is from the WHO of all things... Bruh. Can we trust the WHO's research teams on this shit are not part of the plague of data fraud among science and data circles? Fraud for monetary or clout reasons is a huge fucking problem. Gotta be careful about accepting data that's a convenient lie.
6:25 - "heating up the brain after a six minute phone call" Well. if the entire core of this problem is "heating up the person's brain," then you would ABSOLUTELY feel your skin burning before you started getting brain problems.
7:28 - Talking about microwave ovens, as I said in the preamble. "Same frequency as the cell phone". No. fucking no. check >>6736 Microwaves are NOT at it, they are CLOSE but NOT at it. I will give credit to the infographic, it does give a decent explanation of the EM spectrum.
7:43 - "...The difference between them is power," ...Why do I have a feeling that she is gonna defeat her own message with this sentence?
8:10 - Pulsed radiation is the problem?... This seems weird, RF radiation being pulsed vs sustained is hardly a difference if it's the same wattage. Power in = damage out, common-sense physics.
8:26 - Holy shit that "pulse" demonstration. jesus fuck.
8:45 - "...The continuous wave signals have a lot of therapeutic effects..." '''BRUH. WHAT.''' First off, in the sentence before, '''she demonizes microwaves because it's PULSED, but praises microwaves when it's SUSTAINED??''' Microwaves are microwaves, frequency is frequency.
8:55 - Nice little little animations, but there's a problem. What do the bottom or top numbers represent in the graph? Frequency? Watts? Bandwidth? Why are you leaving this out, lady?
9:16 - What does v/M mean on this graph? What about the rest of the graph. Is that time? Crucial data for measurements that is AGAIN being omitted... Why are you still leaving shit out lady?
9:30 - Works pretty much like wireless protocol. https:
11:24 - Referencing data from 20 years ago, funded by Motorola, and the US DoD, and the funding lost when he published it. I tried looking him up, found his papers, but got cockblocked out of them by paywalls and the FCC's pajeet-built websites.
12:12 - "...So professor Ghandi, whom I'm collaborating with now..." So she's referencing a then-13-year-old research paper from her colleague. Alright.
13:00 - The radiation models updated from 2D to 3D. What she shoes is the radiation absorbsion from various frequencies, notable in that the LOWER frequencies are portrayed to have more depth penetration than the higher frequencies... I thought the concern here was MICROWAVES, yet '''the very fucking model in her presentation conflicts with the presentation's purpose!'''
13:50 - shows a 2d model vs the angled 3D models of the previous ones. But what is intersting is it shows something that was missing from the 3d models - a cell phone model, and how it works in relation to the person's head...
14:40 - fluff fluff, microwaves will ruin your gonads.
15:54 - "...The united states magazine of consumer reports recently recommended that nobody keep a phone in their pocket." Hmmm.... the US magazine of consumer reports? Funny. https:
16:00 to 22:25 - Fluff about pregnancy that repeats points she's alrady talked about, and what I've already bitched about.
22:34 - She's talking about RADAR now. Okay, how is she gonna fuck things up this time?...
23:45 - She cites a SIMULATION of cellular microwave damage. A simulation? How can you be sure that the one who made this simulation didn't have a broken model because of the industry-wide-problem called PUBLISH OR PERISH. Even then, the animals are -much- smaller than humans are, and thus take more damage from RF radiation, '''her own fucking models prove this'''!
26:59 - After MORE pregnancy-related fluff, she shows us a bar graph with antennas... Seriously, come on. Why are the antennas in the graphs nessecary? Did she follow some psychology course that journos and news orgs take to manipulate people?
29:30 - yet ANOTHER FUCKING GRAPH WITH OMITTED DATA! It's literally just showing a time comparison of an unspecified sperm count. For fuck's sake lady.
30:30 - Another animal comparison that conflates microwave damage with humans, despite using animals that naturally are smaller and more-vulnerable to microwave radiation.
32:30 to 33:28 - Talk about breast cancer because of alleged RF radiation... I'm surprised, this is actually interesting. Another thing I'm concerned about is- cases. Most people have cases with their phones to protect them from drops or jolts because, well, PHONES ARE EXPENSIVE. and I think a bare-metal-to-skin contact could be more effective.
34:15 - summary of cancer cases. What I'm concerned about, is if there is a real cancer risk with phonesm then WHY THE FUCK DID SHE NEED TO OMIT DATA ON THE GRAPHS?? And again, phone cases, in theory -should- affect transmission power of microwaves and RF radiation, or at least have some limit of contact to the person's skin.
35:16 - "...in 2011 the World health Organization had reviewed all of the evidence, and decided that mobile phone radiation was a '''possible''' human carcinogen,". (emphasis is mine.) Jesus fucking christ. journo buzzwords much?
36:26 - She talks about how the WHO is no longer doing research on cell phone radiation... '''Hmmmm...'''
39:42 - I can read the quiet part already "YOUR KIDS WILL GET BRAIN CANCER IN 40 YEARS BECAUSE OF MICROWAVE RADIATION, BE AFRAID, GIVE US MONEY!". Come the fuck on.
40:53 - this part is fucking rich, considering she uses graphs and models with omitted data. bitch, please.
42:12 - I remember this, commercials in those years crying about "save the honeybees". Which.. Honestly, I both understand, and at the same time, I'm not so sure about, because of how so much fucking alarmism in television the past thirty fucking years has devalued the entire structure of media as a whole. I honestly, would like to see apiary or farmer's tests on RF with honeybees before I would a university or journo's tests.
43:39 - '''THIS IS THE ENTIRE REASON I MADE THIS COMMENTARY!''' Of course, she doesn't realize that her own info in this VERY FUCKING SCREEN is a double-edged sword! Yet. At the same fucking time, she went on this entire spiel about cell phones and cancer, despite the fact that there has been incentive to lie about this, for fucking decades.
(the rest onwards is fluff about laws, and it ends on a "what you can do about it" things.)
(1/2)