/tech/ - Technology

>>12150
>just look at how sophisticated their tracking systems are
They were already as sophisticated as they had to be a decade ago. There were already ways to de-anonymize browsers and phones made that even easier. All they do now is change shit to show higher ups they're doing something so the higher ups can tell their higher up that they are doing something. 
A monopoly is a two sided dagger. They're the only video site but because they're the only video site there is always going to be hundreds if not thousands of people working 24/7 to crack the site, and they can thwart any roadblock Google is willing to pay for.

>>12146 (OP)  what happened to newpipe did it die or something?
wow i love that simplistic birb logo also boycott KDE and thier disgusting furbait KATE mascot i just want my text editor back not this stupid blue pink woodpecker turd.

>odysee
cucked censored piece of shit that takes down "muh notsee content" and videos related to some cuckchan school shooting smells like controlled opposition for sponsored alt tech jewtubers

>>12148
>sigciphers
never heard about it yet QRD me on this algorithm

Also speaking of censorship (when 2020 started rolling) what are your thoughts on wokist/lefty youtubers who suddenly encoraged users to visit "bad-goy" websites like 1984chan and the likes and they also admitted to shitposting themselves (mutahar and moonreal is a big example of this) this whole thing honestly looks like standard practice at this point to appear unbiased and legitimate even though anyone who isnt retarded can see thier hidden agenda.

its just strange isnt it? dunno if its just me but why is youtube suddenly allowing covert "far righter rhetoric" under the guise "godly self imporvement" its almost like they earn good profit from selling out "toxic nofap motivation" ideologies from these staged eceleb channels behind everyones backs.

i fucking swear to god the comments section is literlly filled with edgy teenagers trying too hard to LARP as self righteous mature 10/10 chad aryan males spewing out (sometimes fabricated) force positivity quotes and trying to bully those "ebil weak men" who dont confom to thier "mentally strong mindset™" literally like /r9gay/ but inverted.

Screenshot_2023-11-08_21-00-10.png
[Hide] (99.1KB, 936x568)

>>12152
you never get the actual link to anything, the server generates timed links and give you a scrambled url, the ytplayer has the instructions to descramble the url into a working link, its just a sequence of shifts and splices on the url but it changes each week, its easy to get around only because they always obfuscate the code exactly the same way so its easy to find the cipher instructions they could make it a lot harder they just dont care

app.jpg
[Hide] (40.3KB, 480x360)

>>12146 (OP) 

19112747_p0_square1200.jpg
[Hide] (52.1KB, 540x540)

>>12146 (OP) 
Hi Louis

>>1150
>I'm gettin real tired of this "preferred pronouns" bullshit.
My prefered pronouns are, he/il/hit/ler

Debate Me.

>>6132
I'll bite. Your pronouns should form a complete word, since they only use one at a time. For example, with he/il/hit/ler,
>He hates niggers
>Il jewdar is ticking
It is better to use complete words or sentences. I-hate-niggers/Faggot-killer's
>I-hate-niggers hates niggers
>Faggot-killer's jewdar is ticking

1673349307291431.png
[Hide] (584.2KB, 1111x705)

Supposedly, there was some sort of controversy related to MPV and this image? Can anyone enlighten me on that?

mpv has always been trannyware for ironic freetards.

>>3438
Very fucking true

>>13118 (OP) 
Such program doesn't exist. Image boards use different software and clients usually only support some of them.
To write your own, you can either web scrape or find & use apis of specific image board software.

Just make it yourself. I did too.

There is one braindead easy way to do it, which is what I do: periodically curl the page of the board you want to keep watch and diff it with the last one you downloaded. If they differ, a new post was made, you can do whatever you want with this information. I just push a desktop notification.

>>6092
Please post it.

>>6495
philosophically illiterate post

>>6525
>everything I disagree is philosophically illiterate
Are you so philosophically illiterate that you can't even explain why you disagree with anything?

Bumperino!

>>13141
Ask ChatGPT to do it for you. I post the plus version in the other thread. Mostly likely have to debug yourself, but at least that’s something.

KISS, just make spamming expensive. Ban any subnet that spams, and then reject all emails from them with a note that says they have to pay to get unbanned.

>>13000
I doubt spammers are using some kind of content analysis tools to find email addresses because nobody really hides them like that, at most people add spaces or parentheses around @ or replace it with "(at)" or something. I've seen a few websites that put their email onto an image.

I think sharing the contact address indirectly is very powerful at stopping the vast majority if not all bot spam, but it'll only work as long as it's unpopular so it's not any kind of final solution to spam. Replacing the "@" and "." with images would probably be enough too, it's unlikely that any bot is smart enough to figure out there's an email there unless they render the whole page and use an image-to-text converter on that (which they might start doing if everyone starts obscuring their addresses).

There are some very advanced techniques to del with spam. Take a look at rspamd, you can use bayes classifier https://rspamd.com/doc/configuration/statistic.html and even neural network https://rspamd.com/doc/modules/neural.html to deal with spam.
With how llms are popular today, I am surprised that it is not commonly done.

>>13004
There's way too many people, even in business settings, who speak like troglodytes, and chat bots are indistinguishable from humans at this point. I don't see how analyzing sentence structure can detect a bot for that reason. AI may be able to do something but I'm not very confident about it because a lot of spam mail sound very similar some kind of business offers, who knows though.

1709159499183-tegaki.png
[Hide] (11.7KB, 500x500)

That's what happens when you put your email address somewhere where it can be scrapped or give it to a company that sells it.
There is no solution to that if you want a permanent address inbox open to anyone.

You could regularly change the public address while staying connected with important people with SimpleX which I made a thread about but nobody is gonna use that just to write some stranger one message. I could be wrong though.

So there you go. It's gonna stay fucked.
I receive no sms spam though. Probably because it costs money to send them or because I haven't given it to any shitty websites nor posted on the web.

As others said, putting it in an image is probably a good solution.
Maybe put it vertically in the image and make @ larger, so it can't be ocr'd as easily.

I've always wanted to reverse engineer older games to port them to modern OSs, this thread will come in handy when I finally make that leap.
Anyone ITT tried that?

>>12244
No, but I have seen a few games de-compiled for that purpose. I think a few people did it for Mario 64 and now you can run it natively on linux.

>>12253
Mario 64 has been fully decompiled and ported to other OSs, I did compile it and run it natively on my Linux machine. Zelda OoT has also been fully decompiled but was not ported to other OSs, perhaps there's potential for a project there...

>>12265
Have you seen the Banjo Kazooie decompilation project?

>>9839
>This release incorporates several changes that are incompatible with the previous version. Therefore, it is recommended to do a clean install.
The version number doesn't reflect that though, are you using semver?

>>9839
Does anybody use the software?

>>9846
>are you using semver
Doubtful.

>>9852
Yes and the public kiosk is only a portion of the communication that happens over bitchan. I run the software locally and have access to boards that don't appear on the kiosk mentioned on the github.

>>9862
>Doubtful
You should: https://semver.org/

this shit should have use i2p for in-between bitchan instances messaging and message routing.

afaik, bitmessage's message routing stuff sucks ass, offers no untraceability.

>>12238 (OP) 
Anyone using onion should be aware about the risks. This isn't a particular new idea

>privacy-conscious technology board devolves into grifting and scamming 
Lame.

>>10411 (checked)
Love the design, and interesting idea for a website. Great job keeping the interface simple but colorful.
>plz r8
You have 2 options:
1. Keep each review multi-page, but make the pagination bigger and more obvious.
2. Make each review a single page, but replace full-size images with small compressed thumbnails, to accommodate users with slow connections. thanks for that by the way, t. third world anon

this-shit-again.jpg
[Hide] (32.7KB, 1222x369)

In case you are wondering why no one is posting their websites in a thread which asks for them, it is because mods are deleting them. I made two posts here last night. One about CF and the deleted one. 

My site is not in violation of any rules except maybe a software copyright. See, this is why I don't come to zzzchan and contribute hardly ever. If you don't want quality posters just say so - I'll not send 1 more byte of traffic to this place. No need to tranny-janny. 

See you on 998fun or CC (.onion).

>>11582
I had no idea. But that does line up as this board really stagnates for months.

>>11691
The board being slow has notjing to do with that. It is mostly me being too busy and sick to reply.

>>11582
Glad it's not just me having that experience then. I visit the site less and less now.

fuck off jewsh

>>11296
>Tor was indeed invented for this type of situation but 90% of people are too lazy to even install the Tor browser
Good. 99% percent of people shouldn't be allowed to own a computer

>>11295
>>11292 (OP) 

West coast cuckada here. I haven't been able to access kiwifarms.net probably for months now. I don't remember the last time I tried, but even tor didn't work. I thought the site was taken down? I just checked again, and still can't access it, even via tor. What gives?

Is kiwifags up yet?

>>11560
kiwifarms.st