>>312219
>skg dude mentions private servers
>esa whore conflates that with reverse engineered server emus and maybe even offline cracks for freemium gaas
>skg dude is too autistic to call her on it
>boomertarded senator pipes up, apparently thinking they're talking about warez seeders
>esa whore says yeah
>skg dude too autistic to correct that either
On the one hand, what a shitshow. On the other hand, as someone who semi-recreationally watches legislative sessions, this bottom of the barrel level of debate is basically the default.
<abloo muh ai abloo muh plagiarism machines
LOL what a giant dweeb nobody cares
Also, on the subject of Minecraft, and private servers, and think of the children, M$ has done something far more insidious than attacking private servers.
Unlike most buy-to-own games even today, Minecraft is unusual in that it is linked to an account. If this account is revoked, not only will your server be removed from M$'s 1st-party hosting service ("Realms"), or M$'s 1st-party metaserver (Official Server List), or even the ability to host servers of any kind down to LAN. Your entire copy of Minecraft linked to that account will simply stop working, not just all of your hosted server down to LAN, but even joining a server, or playing single-player offline. And this policy was rolled out alongside overreaching EULA changes extending bannable offenses from mere piracy and hacking, to cover crazy stuff like firearm mods and (autoenforced by bots) naughty words in chat or signs, even on non-public or LAN servers.