/meta/ - Meta

Meta Discussion and Admin Announcements

New Thread
Files Max 5 files32MB total
Captcha*Select the solid/filled icons
[New Thread]

[Hide] (17.1KB, 556x401)
Please make an even worse captcha, thanks.
16 replies and 1 file omitted. View the full thread
The problem where you get the same captcha over and over seems to be caused by caching. Since the captcha image is loaded from a generic url (/captcha) it loads the result that was cached previously. You can fix it by using "/captcha?unique_number" instead of "/captcha" as the URL (where unique_number can be anything as long as it's different, for example current time).
The captcha is an excellent tool for teaching methodical problem solving which is valuable in programming. I will pass the test, one day.

[Hide] (19.6KB, 1195x843)
I brought this issue up in the /v/ gamergate thread and was told to repost it here.  For reference, I'm >>>/v/26109.

To summarize, I wanted to know why minor shitposting was deleted in the gamergate thread even though other threads (like the first FPS general) had much more and much worse periods of shitposting/calling OP a faggot at the start.

The reply I got from Seagull (presumably; no capcode) was >>>/v/26199, which claimed that deleting bitching about the threads was not preferential treatment because these threads are allowed under the rules - even if the rules literally refer to them as "special" threads, and no other threads get scrubbed like that.  Yes, I'm aware that the rules put ""special"" in quotations, which somewhat diminishes the strength of the word, but the fact remains that they are exceptions to rules like "effortless threads will be met with ridicule."

Seagull said to take the issue up with the BO, so here we are.  I'm sure that the reply will be "stay mad faggot these threads are BASED and always allowed!" but I'm just going through the proper channels.

And before anyone tells me that this shouldn't come as a surprise, it's not the presence of gamergate threads that I'm specifically taking issue with (although I do maintain they are worthless and attract all kinds of non-vidya attention whores).  My point is that if
Message too long. View the full text
436 replies and 142 files omitted. View the full thread
I'm asking for the exact opposite.
Anons were right to just point and laugh at OP. We know that there is/are bad actors who stir the shit just for the sake of it, so that was the right course of action.
Every time I want to put a pin in any drama horsehit, there's always at least one sperg (in this case you) trying to pull triple fudge reverse-retard-psychology.
So lmao-ing @ ur lyfe rn fam
Replies: >>4287
Whats next, you gonna tell us to visit 8chan.moe or prolikewoah? To give up our "allegiances" and leave zzzchan? Fucking retard, hope the mods dox you again.
[Hide] (62.4KB, 926x345)
Why are federal agents allowed to get the site shut down with plausible deniability on /v/?
[Hide] (195.7KB, 905x776)
[Hide] (6.7KB, 727x47)
[Hide] (11.1KB, 595x123)
I know that rapeman is new, but is he really so new that he doesn't recognize obvious astroturfing and edenposting for what it is?  (I'd call it demoralization but that might imply it ever accomplishes anything.)

The "X nobody asked for" phrase gets posted literally every single time anyone suggests or tries to host a game night.
Game has been popular and proven to work?  Nobody asked for it; do something new.
Trying a new game?  Nobody asked for it; don't bother.
Game night was popular?  Nobody asked for it; that can't be true.

I've seen this happen for literal years on zzz/v/, and the consistency plus the autistic obsession with the exact same phrase every single time is strong evidence that it's eden.  These posts should always be deleted from any game night or game night-adjacent thread they're found in.

Yet when I reported it a few days ago, rapeman dismissed the reports with no explanation.  Why?

Pics 1 and 2 are the posts in question.  Pic 3 is another example I found in the previous game night organization thread.
If they were right then they wouldn’t be banned in the first place.

[Hide] (32.5KB, 136x228)
hi update jschan please
fank u
[Hide] (28KB, 62x106)
maranax infirmux
[Hide] (482.8KB, 750x1000)
[Hide] (3.6MB, 02:11)
[Hide] (1.2MB, 660x458)
fuck off tom

[Hide] (934.4KB, 1365x767)
How difficult would it be to set up a streaming platform to run alongside this site? 8ch has one but a lot of people don't like that site for various reasons. They use OSP and it seems to work most of the time, and seems to be fairly easy to set up. Between BMN and the increasing number of streamers on /v/ there seems to be a good amount of people that would use it. Is the current server strong enough to handle the load?
6 replies and 2 files omitted. View the full thread
the site i stream with has not updated to this new system, do you have any alternatives that I could use instead?
Replies: >>4072
The instance I'm currently using has disabled registrations, so you can search for an instance here instead (adjust filters):
Check the peertube version of each instance before registering, you can view it on the about page or similar. Any version >=4.2 is golden.
[Hide] (84.3KB, 640x480)
Mr. Fish, I have disposable income and I am willing to offer you payment in BTC if you were to rent another VPS and host OSP on it so us streamfags can break away from cakejew's clutches and be totally independent. Peertube instances are a crapshoot, their web player is garbage, and streaming to them is less than stable. Streaming to 8ch.moe is much more stable by comparison and simply just works, but since nobody here trusts the site (for valid reasons) I am wary at best of using it for anything.
According to OBS, it's minimum requirements are a dual-core CPU, 4GB of RAM, and a 3500mbps upstream bitrate. Having double those specs (quad-core CPU, 8GB RAM, 5TB monthly transfer, and speeds of 40gbps in/5gpbs out) runs about $60 monthly with my VPS provider and should be roughly the same across the board.
Again, I am willing to give you free money to host a streaming service. Please reply to this if you are interested and where I could contact you for further discussion.
Replies: >>4200 >>4201
Waste of time, Nigmin hates free money I wanted arrange the purchase of the site and negotiate a price and was even willing to pay a couple thousands and retard just locked my thread lol, stupid fucking retard.
[Hide] (781.1KB, 1100x618, 00:09)
>muh cakejew boogeyman
You deserve to post on a dead board where even the few loyal users remaining are resorting to crossposting on 8moe

[Hide] (248.2KB, 1024x768)
Why doesn't it have a lokinet instance? It's faster, more secure and decentralized.
2 replies omitted. View the full thread
The problem with improved TOR facilities is that it carries the inherent risk of TORfags feeling more comfortable with the site and posting more.
Replies: >>4159 >>4167
This is true.  If it make TORpedos happy, I'm against it.
Replies: >>4167
Go back.
Explain why it's better. In detail please.
>buy my token goy
remember when lokinet wasn't the joke on that chart?

[Hide] (136.2KB, 768x507)
Do you consider zzz your home? Why do you stay here and not another place on the webring?
How many other boards on the webring do you regularly visit?
If you use tor, why come here at all instead of a tor only imageboard?
Do you think there are "better" chans for specific boards?
In terms of users/admin, what would you say is the differences between zzz, and say anoncafe?
21 replies and 4 files omitted. View the full thread
Forgot indiachan, whoops
>responding to data mining thread
Replies: >>4165
maybe i use all or none of those websites, who knows
Replies: >>4166
Shills and feds use this kind of threads to find new sites.
[Hide] (24.4KB, 1020x361)
>heartily chuckled
>faux pas
1/10, eden

spoiler test
36 replies and 26 files omitted. View the full thread
spoiler text
((( detected )))
(##2d9+3) Rolled 2 dice with 9 sides and modifier +3 = 12
inline monospace
int main() { return 0; }
( ・ω・) Let's try that again.
Message too long. View the full text

[Hide] (89.5KB, 1200x827)
The bug reporting thread is getting slow to load.  Discuss issues with the new version here.
12 replies and 4 files omitted. View the full thread
Replies: >>4048
Ignore my question about the spoiler; I hadn't looked at the /v/ banner thread.  My other inquiries still stand, however.
Status update: not getting fixed, don't kid yourself.
[Hide] (7.3KB, 150x150)
>>3974 (OP) 
I am unsure what the fuck I'm doing wrong but I cannot solve the captcha anymore. I'm trying to report CP spam and this stupid thing is preventing me from doing so.
Using the grid system within the API, I tried to answer 0 1 3 6 7 8 15 but the server keeps telling me it's somehow wrong???
Replies: >>4049 >>4062
[Hide] (17.4KB, 326x310)
get filtered, faggot
The answer was 1 2 4 7 8 9 16

[Hide] (18.3KB, 429x410)
Are you going to deal with the herdnigger spam on /b/ or will you let it become a mess beyond saving like you've done for the past months?

I've put in several global reports on their obvious and recognizable spam, and you dipshits haven't done anything about it besides leaving it up.
55 replies and 22 files omitted. View the full thread
Bumping this thread just to ask if you can get rid of that fucking soyjak faggot
Replies: >>3870
/b/ is kill, cancer won, let it go.
Replies: >>3871
What if I don't want to?
That TOR posting can have different IDs, retard.
Welp, looks like the shite dick spammer is back.

Thanks for nothing Sturgeon. You truly are an incompetent faggot, just like ((( alex ))).

[Hide] (108.2KB, 210x240)
some stupid fucking script kiddie was hitting the login endpoint a few hundred times per second from the onion

stop being a skid faggot.
15 replies and 6 files omitted. View the full thread

the temporary solution I've implemented is a separate .onion for moderators, who are the only people who would ever need to login in the first place. 
dos skids want the site unavailable. if they can't have that, wasting *human* time engineering overblown solutions and/or chasing circuits is a good alternative. 

since I've gotten involved, I'm also reviewing jschan's code to see if basic form validation can happen/is happening *before* expensive operations are incurred. 

the attack stopped roughly three hours after I shut his ass up.
[Hide] (312.8KB, 480x451)
>open source bot protection
>Your search for "open source bot protection" returned 0 results

how about some sauce?
Replies: >>4019
did you think it was fake or something?
>false flag
QRD on what happened? i was gone a few days ago fugg the snootgame aint gonna archive itself

why no add a captcha on the login like other sites do

what about bunkerized NGINX? i saw some obscure hack forum had this setup instead of buttflare
Replies: >>4035
What do you mean by bunkerized nginx? It sounds like adding a bunch of limits and restrictions which is generally the fastest way to unintentionally dos yourself.

Show Post Actions



Select the solid/filled icons
- news - rules - faq -
jschan 0.10.2