/meta/ - Meta

>>2364
Retard proof mini-game captchas are the superior method. We need tom to create more, especially a clock based one, then have it randomly choose which captcha you get every time so it's always a fresh experience.

>>2365
As fun as minigames are, JS-only captchas are mega garbage.

>>2366
I'm basically just calling the chess captcha a mini-game. And I don't think the chess captcha requires JS.

>>2367
Oh, I was thinking of actual minigames you'd have to complete. And yeah, the chess captcha needs no js.

>>2357
> Smug has an autojanitor bot 
which is brain damage.

>>2364
this

>>2230 (OP) 
yeah my new configs aren't perfect yet. I just wish this shit would stop happening while I was asleep. >>>/meta/2151

961ae006e10fbc702747fa22f58b932ac8d5be95f99550c3efc25dceaf89c541.jpg (u)
[Hide] (57.5KB, 660x436)

>>2232
Sleep is for the weak.
I know you're doing your best, keep it up

>>2233 checked
context?

>>2234
no clue, but I always thought the thumbnail looked like the guy was drinking a glass of liquor after a hurricane leveled his house.

Now what?

Why discriminate against tor users?
What value is there in knowing if someone is using tor?

>>2312
There isn't value in knowing someone is using tor. There is value in tor users being indistinguishable from each other. The entire point of the tor browser bundle is that one client is indistinguishable from the next. There is value in giving tor users a unique captcha based ID, but there is also value in them sharing an ID and being properly anonymous.

I would prefer the latter, but I understand the former from a moderation perspective. And it obviously makes conversations a little less confusing. It sort of boils down to the same discussion about ID's vs no ID's. I don't think there is a right answer for everyone.

>>2311
Yes, thats the header I'm trying to pass through. Looking to get it working tonight.

>>2312
>>2314
I belive the captcha token would be the only identifier and there would be nothing preventing tor users from getting a new one any time. This would only let us hand out bans/purge by token without accidentally all tor users without actually compromising security. They'd have to trace you thru the tor network, raid you and seize your box, and find a token you can purge at any time on it to link you to posts made here. Not a likely scenario.

This is more about making the only real attack vector, manual spam, that much harder.

51848a11e5a6de467ee08b20e05142c9ec357a4c429767cfef69ec4b1af7ddcf.gif (u)
[Hide] (46KB, 107x195)

>>2055
asset

test
a test a

>>2160
No it isn't active, its sub 100 users on a good day and sub 50 on a bad and half of them are faggots. You will not, and cannot, hit the critical mass of users required to foster spontaneous and self sufficient conversation as the board is just a handful of people talking to each other because at some point they will run out of things to say.

I can go on halfchan right now and make a thread about an obscure game and it will get 100 posts before it dies. Here it would get one post as it sinks to the bottom of the catalog in about 2 months time give or take. The only threads that get attention are drama ones and those that mention 8cake, yet these same users who are so quick to complain or bitch are no where to be found posting in the rest of the board.

>>2201
Go post on CUCKchan then, faggotroid.

>>2203
Typical response, but not unexpected. This site will be dead within the year.  The truth hurts kiddo.

c.jpg (u)
[Hide] (59.5KB, 395x401)

>>2210
>cuckchanner still replying

>>2212
lamoing at ur lyfe kiddo

>>553
The strong have the right to do whatever the hell they want. It's a right granted to them by nature.

test

testing

>>518
>>518

>>3089
Oh thank fucking god, I'm not retarded

>>1196
Why?

4af6c8962fb9f63729bb3b9f967b9437dc995145b85aef06e07724a1c5881145.jpg (u)
[Hide] (97.5KB, 1033x862)

Pedoniggers are back on /b/, but they're not from (((chantopia))) or (((biznnel))).
Check global reports please. Thank you for your time ^_^

Bump to keep the biznel pedoniggers out.

>>2180
They'll never fuck off from /b/. They infest every /b/ they touch like a fucking cancer except cuckchan, but we all know why they avoid cuckchan entirely, the same reason ziggers avoid cuckchan.

>>1170

>>2103 (OP) 
Apply for one then.

>>2104
I don't know how to moderate and also I kinda don't want to be a bo

>>2105
Oh well just wait for someone to take the reigns of /o/ then. I'd like to see an /o/ on the webring too just to get back into being an aut/o/ autist without having to go back to cuckchan.

/o/ - otamatone

>>2107
No cars.

>DELETE!
>DELETE!
>DELETE!

yeah, no.

>>2098
>>2097
die pedos, on day of the rope you'll swing from lamp posts along niggers and kikes

>>2099
larp harder if you think you can

ruffalo.jpg (u)
[Hide] (1.3MB, 2700x1761)

ｷﾀ━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━!!

>>1410
Lick the cyanide and die already normalshit 8cuck

>>1519
>this is your brain on guntstream

Any chance you could enable .swf file uploads so we can have good ol' flash threads? Cakechan has that.

>>2090
That's not up to Sturgeon. Tom needs to give us .swf support

>>2091
There is a config option in JSchan to allow custom file MIME types somewhere. I'm sure sturg could enable .swf support himself.

>>2049
Go back there schizo normalnigger.

>>1982
>>1983
>>1989
This has been spammed all over cuckchan since the election when it started having errors for a couple of seconds due to the increased traffic. Not saying that Cloudflare wouldn't deplatform some sites when they feel like they need to make an example of someone again but the screenshot looks more like the n-th iteration of the same old cuckchan hoax. What about Ruskie Cloudflare, do they deplatform?

>>2049
>knowing that cuckchan was down

Wait a minute
If I have a custom spoiler on my board will it show as such on the overboard? I imagine not because it's attached to the board specific custom css

>>2050
kys kike