/meta/ - Meta

Meta Discussion and Admin Announcements


New Thread
Name
×
Email
Subject
Message
Files Max 5 files32MB total
Tegaki
Password
Captcha*Select the solid/filled icons
[New Thread]


>>>/christian/ has joined us from cafe


0287437e4e339d6c7de2d299919bbe616ee446e62a27a3b0cf3248b05d94b515.png
[Hide] (934.4KB, 1365x767)
How difficult would it be to set up a streaming platform to run alongside this site? 8ch has one but a lot of people don't like that site for various reasons. They use OSP and it seems to work most of the time, and seems to be fairly easy to set up. Between BMN and the increasing number of streamers on /v/ there seems to be a good amount of people that would use it. Is the current server strong enough to handle the load?
https://openstreamingplatform.com/
6 replies and 2 files omitted. View the full thread
>>4070
the site i stream with has not updated to this new system, do you have any alternatives that I could use instead?
Replies: >>4072
>>4071
The instance I'm currently using has disabled registrations, so you can search for an instance here instead (adjust filters):
https://joinpeertube.org/instances#instances-list
Check the peertube version of each instance before registering, you can view it on the about page or similar. Any version >=4.2 is golden.
383e5a340a5b9dbd44ff489df0a2b2cca6ce666d578cab9c270fd262e02db0f8.jpg
[Hide] (84.3KB, 640x480)
Mr. Fish, I have disposable income and I am willing to offer you payment in BTC if you were to rent another VPS and host OSP on it so us streamfags can break away from cakejew's clutches and be totally independent. Peertube instances are a crapshoot, their web player is garbage, and streaming to them is less than stable. Streaming to 8ch.moe is much more stable by comparison and simply just works, but since nobody here trusts the site (for valid reasons) I am wary at best of using it for anything.
According to OBS, it's minimum requirements are a dual-core CPU, 4GB of RAM, and a 3500mbps upstream bitrate. Having double those specs (quad-core CPU, 8GB RAM, 5TB monthly transfer, and speeds of 40gbps in/5gpbs out) runs about $60 monthly with my VPS provider and should be roughly the same across the board.
Again, I am willing to give you free money to host a streaming service. Please reply to this if you are interested and where I could contact you for further discussion.
Replies: >>4200 >>4201
>>4199
Waste of time, Nigmin hates free money I wanted arrange the purchase of the site and negotiate a price and was even willing to pay a couple thousands and retard just locked my thread lol, stupid fucking retard.
f2f825b3f1e9997c03e21af8e13af9ead88f99fc6022a6fce36118c25b901760.mp4
[Hide] (781.1KB, 1100x618, 00:09)
>>4199
>muh cakejew boogeyman
You deserve to post on a dead board where even the few loyal users remaining are resorting to crossposting on 8moe

lokinet_tor_i2p.jpg
[Hide] (248.2KB, 1024x768)
Why doesn't it have a lokinet instance? It's faster, more secure and decentralized.
2 replies omitted. View the full thread
The problem with improved TOR facilities is that it carries the inherent risk of TORfags feeling more comfortable with the site and posting more.
Replies: >>4159 >>4167
>>4157
This is true.  If it make TORpedos happy, I'm against it.
Replies: >>4167
>>4159
>>4157
Go back.
Explain why it's better. In detail please.
>buy my token goy
remember when lokinet wasn't the joke on that chart?

8d997a4aebbab162f62f14672d5322036141166a214590f7b945ce43a3d81d77.png
[Hide] (89.5KB, 1200x827)
The bug reporting thread is getting slow to load.  Discuss issues with the new version here.
12 replies and 4 files omitted. View the full thread
Replies: >>4048
>>4045
Ignore my question about the spoiler; I hadn't looked at the /v/ banner thread.  My other inquiries still stand, however.
>>4045
Status update: not getting fixed, don't kid yourself.
62a74c7a4b36a96d0b436da7.jpg
[Hide] (7.3KB, 150x150)
>>3974 (OP) 
I am unsure what the fuck I'm doing wrong but I cannot solve the captcha anymore. I'm trying to report CP spam and this stupid thing is preventing me from doing so.
Using the grid system within the API, I tried to answer 0 1 3 6 7 8 15 but the server keeps telling me it's somehow wrong???
Replies: >>4049 >>4062
smug_lois_2.JPG
[Hide] (17.4KB, 326x310)
>>4048
get filtered, faggot
>>4048
The answer was 1 2 4 7 8 9 16

aom13a9dnbs21.png
[Hide] (108.2KB, 210x240)
some stupid fucking script kiddie was hitting the login endpoint a few hundred times per second from the onion

stop being a skid faggot.
15 replies and 6 files omitted. View the full thread
>>4008
>>4010

the temporary solution I've implemented is a separate .onion for moderators, who are the only people who would ever need to login in the first place. 
dos skids want the site unavailable. if they can't have that, wasting *human* time engineering overblown solutions and/or chasing circuits is a good alternative. 

since I've gotten involved, I'm also reviewing jschan's code to see if basic form validation can happen/is happening *before* expensive operations are incurred. 

the attack stopped roughly three hours after I shut his ass up.
ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (312.8KB, 480x451)
>>4006
>open source bot protection
>Your search for "open source bot protection" returned 0 results

how about some sauce?
Replies: >>4019
>>4017
https://gitgud.io/fatchan/haproxy-protection/
https://gitgud.io/fatchan/haproxy-panel-next/
did you think it was fake or something?
>>4004
>false flag
QRD on what happened? i was gone a few days ago fugg the snootgame aint gonna archive itself

>>4007
why no add a captcha on the login like other sites do

>>4010
what about bunkerized NGINX? i saw some obscure hack forum had this setup instead of buttflare
Replies: >>4035
>>4029
What do you mean by bunkerized nginx? It sounds like adding a bunch of limits and restrictions which is generally the fastest way to unintentionally dos yourself.

1644223679156.png
[Hide] (445.2KB, 792x705)
Make sure to never let the fat kike Mark back on the webring.
7 replies and 1 file omitted. View the full thread
35ab2821d7be9ca67a3fbc83c8cdea91ae7a7ffd9a2216dd65c6c52f352f72b4.png
[Hide] (154.7KB, 275x183)
>>3751
this well aged well
Replies: >>3753
>>3752
This well well well
Replies: >>3768
belle13.jpg
[Hide] (1.4MB, 2208x1188)
>>3753
well well well well
BIG
based

junbi_dazo.gif
[Hide] (338.2KB, 500x381)
BOLD POSTING IS BROKEN  ' ' '  DOESN'T WORK ANYMORE FOR SOME REASON
I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU FUCKED IT UP BUY PLS FIX
'test'
54 replies omitted. View the full thread
>greentext
<pinktext
title
bold
underline
strikethrough
spoiler text
italic	italic
((( detected )))
Replies: >>3843 >>3978 >>3994
>>3842
Holy hell it actually works now.  Awesome!
32b53a810672663406ae4040c816004eeb48587b858aa9ef4d42eea36c90d659.png
[Hide] (75.2KB, 320x327)
testing my apng
>>3842
'test'
/// chingchong \\\

>>3842
not sure if this still works i seen this before on another chan

1647854045004.jpg
[Hide] (409.7KB, 800x1088)
Listen fuckface "Sturgeon", jschan is already on motherfcuking 0.5.3 and you're still running 0.3.2? What the fuck is wrong with you? You can't even run this (outdated) version properly, there is a "Thread Watcher" on the version that you're running, where is it? What the fuck are you doing? Faggot.
9 replies and 5 files omitted. View the full thread
Replies: >>3934 + 1 earlier
>>3919 (OP) 
I should have made a separate thread at this point but if you have a look at the bug thread you'll see I'm working on actually reinstalling jschan on the appserver to unfuck whatever it is I've done to the current installation. It should not be a complicated process but I've been experimenting on a separate server while hitting the books on nginx/git/node.js etc so I can be reasonably sure that I won't just fuck things again in the future. Once I've got the process ironed out I'll announce the downtime at least a week in advance and the site will be updated for the db migration, the jschan install will be wiped while retaining the db/files, and the latest version of jschan will be installed and hooked back up to the db/files. I will have a full backup of the server at the ready so I can fully revert to the beginning of the process if needed.

Yes I know it's taking forever work has been insane up until recently.
Replies: >>3939 >>3960
leftypol_Wed_April_20th_2022.png
[Hide] (3.9MB, 1920x4652)
Replies: >>3936
disgusting.mp4
[Hide] (2.6MB, 320x240, 00:11)
>>3935
>leftypol
>>3934
You can always go to >>>/tech/2
>>3934
godspeed

1a25e430509f91909b484c450c18555871408b08af0e376c15bbe6bd1f7badb4.jpg
[Hide] (71.5KB, 692x734)
f24c99a17a84ce3a5973ef7cd4f370eb224db567bcd88d285cac47f6725da5bb.jpg
[Hide] (65.6KB, 687x683)
>We are updated and I figured out what was wrong with pdf and txt files. Those are working now.
did you really update or just changed footer?
check pic rel, one is 0.3.2 settings and other is yours, which still looks like 0.7.1 or whatever old version you had running.
also thread watcher doesn't show up anywhere, check you probably rushed the update.
maybe you need to update from version to version.
1 reply and 1 file omitted. View the full thread
Replies: >>3808
wtf dude, for quick sec saw (u) link and after a refresh it went away.
ADMIN RUSHED UPDATE
ADMIN RUSHED UPDATE
bump
Replies: >>3805
bump
Replies: >>3805
>>3803
>>3804
Do not waste your time, the fish does not care. He is sabotaging, on purpose. Breaks things to toy with the community and see how stupid we are to put up with it.
>>3797 (OP) 
https://gitgud.io/fatchan/jschan/-/blob/master/INSTALLATION.md
I follow this to the letter every time, it's a very quick process. Obviously something's fucked but it's going to take me a while to figure out exactly what and how to fix it cleanly. Tom's been helpful in that regard.

>maybe you need to update from version to version
That's not how git works. Whatever is on the master branch at the time I run git pull should be whats being run here, anything in between then and my last update is automatically applied.

1644700858916.gif
[Hide] (2MB, 540x300)
You haven't updated jschan since 0.1.7 here's what you're missing out

0.3.2

Minor bugfix to post moving.


0.3.1

Small board list optimisation, no longer try to fetch webring site names if webring not enabled.
Make webring blacklisting also apply to endpoints after being fetched, in case the URL is different (alt domain, onions, etc).
Webring.json and site names cache is now removed when webring is disabled.
More reasonable webring timeout for fetching each site.
Webring bugfixes.

Message too long. View the full text
2 replies omitted. View the full thread
>>3756
When are you going to fix italics?
update the software you lazy cunt
Sturgeon is dead, and we killed him.
Replies: >>3782
\could be some important update to fix some critical bug and he still wouldn't do it
>>3779
I can't believe he's dead he was a good fish.

Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

Select the solid/filled icons
- news - rules - faq -
jschan 1.4.1