/meta/ - Meta

>>4421 (OP) 
Looks cool, I can have a look at this but there's more work I want to do on the current setup before tackling i2p. Know any good tutorials/documentation?

4774bb620fb38e4a20e00b26871f38f28062f0e07d341f72842ed2ed9ff745e0.png
[Hide] (647KB, 852x1280)

i2pd_nep.jpg
[Hide] (1.1MB, 852x1280)

>>4423
Quick note for pic related: You should use the HTTP proxy 127.0.0.1:4444 instead of the SOCKS proxy since the HTTP proxy masks your browser user agent to be MYOB/6.66 (AN/ON) while the SOCKS proxy doesn't mask your browser user agent.

Here is a short tutorial on how to create an i2pd HTTP tunnel: https://i2pd.readthedocs.io/en/latest/tutorials/http/

You don't need to open the httpd port for I2P traffic on your firewall. There isn't any nginx example for this, but I have a simple static site example for OpenBSD httpd:
language: json
server "zmjdpytveh2mp6krdnlniupxnv2cgacmffhznbxvgypl63tjchfa.b32.i2p" {
        listen on * port 8080
        root "/htdocs/examplesite"
        no log
}

server "example.i2p" {
        listen on * port 8080

>>4433
Also both pics are years old and outdated, I just post it because of nep

>>4423
install i2pd-qt. Is a lot easier to setup and it comes with qt interface for i2p configuration.

pippa_soypoint.png
[Hide] (411.9KB, 629x629)

>>4433
Turns out you can leave out the "example.i2p" block from your webserver config since those kinds of addresses are simply base64 aliases to the B32 address.

The OpenBSD config would look like this now:
language: json
server "zmjdpytveh2mp6krdnlniupxnv2cgacmffhznbxvgypl63tjchfa.b32.i2p" {
        listen on * port 8080
        root "/htdocs/examplesite"
        no log
}

1661255080124504.gif
[Hide] (28KB, 62x106)

maranax infirmux

1666162848607453.gif
[Hide] (482.8KB, 750x1000)

test

11-wavingmydickinthewind.ogg
[Hide] (3.6MB, 02:11)

test

1dztp1j0.bmp
[Hide] (1.2MB, 660x458)

test

fuck off tom

>>4070
the site i stream with has not updated to this new system, do you have any alternatives that I could use instead?

>>4071
The instance I'm currently using has disabled registrations, so you can search for an instance here instead (adjust filters):
https://joinpeertube.org/instances#instances-list
Check the peertube version of each instance before registering, you can view it on the about page or similar. Any version >=4.2 is golden.

383e5a340a5b9dbd44ff489df0a2b2cca6ce666d578cab9c270fd262e02db0f8.jpg
[Hide] (84.3KB, 640x480)

Mr. Fish, I have disposable income and I am willing to offer you payment in BTC if you were to rent another VPS and host OSP on it so us streamfags can break away from cakejew's clutches and be totally independent. Peertube instances are a crapshoot, their web player is garbage, and streaming to them is less than stable. Streaming to 8ch.moe is much more stable by comparison and simply just works, but since nobody here trusts the site (for valid reasons) I am wary at best of using it for anything.
According to OBS, it's minimum requirements are a dual-core CPU, 4GB of RAM, and a 3500mbps upstream bitrate. Having double those specs (quad-core CPU, 8GB RAM, 5TB monthly transfer, and speeds of 40gbps in/5gpbs out) runs about $60 monthly with my VPS provider and should be roughly the same across the board.
Again, I am willing to give you free money to host a streaming service. Please reply to this if you are interested and where I could contact you for further discussion.

>>4199
Waste of time, Nigmin hates free money I wanted arrange the purchase of the site and negotiate a price and was even willing to pay a couple thousands and retard just locked my thread lol, stupid fucking retard.

f2f825b3f1e9997c03e21af8e13af9ead88f99fc6022a6fce36118c25b901760.mp4
[Hide] (781.1KB, 1100x618, 00:09)

>>4199
>muh cakejew boogeyman
You deserve to post on a dead board where even the few loyal users remaining are resorting to crossposting on 8moe

The problem with improved TOR facilities is that it carries the inherent risk of TORfags feeling more comfortable with the site and posting more.

>>4157
This is true.  If it make TORpedos happy, I'm against it.

>>4159
>>4157
Go back.

Explain why it's better. In detail please.

>buy my token goy
remember when lokinet wasn't the joke on that chart?

>>4045
Ignore my question about the spoiler; I hadn't looked at the /v/ banner thread.  My other inquiries still stand, however.

>>4045
Status update: not getting fixed, don't kid yourself.

62a74c7a4b36a96d0b436da7.jpg
[Hide] (7.3KB, 150x150)

>>3974 (OP) 
I am unsure what the fuck I'm doing wrong but I cannot solve the captcha anymore. I'm trying to report CP spam and this stupid thing is preventing me from doing so.
Using the grid system within the API, I tried to answer 0 1 3 6 7 8 15 but the server keeps telling me it's somehow wrong???

smug_lois_2.JPG
[Hide] (17.4KB, 326x310)

>>4048
get filtered, faggot

>>4048
The answer was 1 2 4 7 8 9 16

>>4008
>>4010

the temporary solution I've implemented is a separate .onion for moderators, who are the only people who would ever need to login in the first place. 
dos skids want the site unavailable. if they can't have that, wasting *human* time engineering overblown solutions and/or chasing circuits is a good alternative. 

since I've gotten involved, I'm also reviewing jschan's code to see if basic form validation can happen/is happening *before* expensive operations are incurred. 

the attack stopped roughly three hours after I shut his ass up.

ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (312.8KB, 480x451)

>>4006
>open source bot protection
>Your search for "open source bot protection" returned 0 results

how about some sauce?

>>4017
https://gitgud.io/fatchan/haproxy-protection/
https://gitgud.io/fatchan/haproxy-panel-next/
did you think it was fake or something?

>>4004
>false flag
QRD on what happened? i was gone a few days ago fugg the snootgame aint gonna archive itself

>>4007
why no add a captcha on the login like other sites do

>>4010
what about bunkerized NGINX? i saw some obscure hack forum had this setup instead of buttflare

>>4029
What do you mean by bunkerized nginx? It sounds like adding a bunch of limits and restrictions which is generally the fastest way to unintentionally dos yourself.

35ab2821d7be9ca67a3fbc83c8cdea91ae7a7ffd9a2216dd65c6c52f352f72b4.png
[Hide] (154.7KB, 275x183)

>>3751
this well aged well

>>3752
This well well well

belle13.jpg
[Hide] (1.4MB, 2208x1188)

>>3753
well well well well

BIG

based

>greentext
<pinktext
title
bold
underline
strikethrough
spoiler text
italic	italic
((( detected )))

>>3842
Holy hell it actually works now.  Awesome!

32b53a810672663406ae4040c816004eeb48587b858aa9ef4d42eea36c90d659.png
[Hide] (75.2KB, 320x327)

testing my apng

>>3842
'test'

/// chingchong \\\

>>3842
not sure if this still works i seen this before on another chan

>>3919 (OP) 
I should have made a separate thread at this point but if you have a look at the bug thread you'll see I'm working on actually reinstalling jschan on the appserver to unfuck whatever it is I've done to the current installation. It should not be a complicated process but I've been experimenting on a separate server while hitting the books on nginx/git/node.js etc so I can be reasonably sure that I won't just fuck things again in the future. Once I've got the process ironed out I'll announce the downtime at least a week in advance and the site will be updated for the db migration, the jschan install will be wiped while retaining the db/files, and the latest version of jschan will be installed and hooked back up to the db/files. I will have a full backup of the server at the ready so I can fully revert to the beginning of the process if needed.

Yes I know it's taking forever work has been insane up until recently.

disgusting.mp4
[Hide] (2.6MB, 320x240, 00:11)

>>3935
>leftypol

>>3934
You can always go to >>>/tech/2

>>3934
godspeed