New Thread
Name
×
Email
Subject
Message
Files Max 5 files32MB total
Tegaki
Password
[New Thread]


ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (947.9KB, 1161x653)
Who wins?
15 replies and 2 files omitted. View the full thread
a91481399e4643e5a752079684184800.jpg
[Hide] (47.2KB, 740x493)
>>1051
>The first debate was horrifying, and showed from before the official start of Kamala's campaign that she wasn't doing her job.
There's a theory that when they forced Biden to withdraw from the race he went off script by nominating Harris and after that they were stuck with her.

>What the hell was up with picking Walz?
They had to pick someone who wouldn't outshine Harris so the bar was extremely high.

>Currying favor from out-of-touch elite Hollywood celebrities.
They are the only people they could blackmail.

>Complete lack of ability to keep up with the current media landscape
It would have been worse for them if Harris had done more interviews because even the most blue pilled NPCs would not be able to deny she is a retard with nothing to say.

>She really fucked up with Rogan.
What's even more retarded about this is that Rogan is a Bernie Sanders socialist. If the Democrats weren't so obsessed with trannies and culture war bullshit he would have been on their side by default. They are the ones who snubbed him not the other way around.
Message too long. View the full text
Replies: >>1054 >>1055
IGETTOMEETAPRESIDENT.webp
[Hide] (72.1KB, 1245x700)
>>1053
>There's a theory that when they forced Biden to withdraw from the race he went off script by nominating Harris and after that they were stuck with her.
Biden 100% shadow campaigned for Trump.  Between the 'garbage' comment, his wife wearing red on election day, and the purple tie w/HUEG smile when Trump visited--he HAD to be behind Trump.
>They had to pick someone who wouldn't outshine Harris so the bar was extremely high.
Why did Trump have no issues picking a VP who outshines him, then?
>They are the only people they could blackmail.
kek
Replies: >>1058
ohnoTESTOSTERONE.PNG
[Hide] (39.1KB, 815x429)
>>1053
>If the Democrats weren't so obsessed with trannies and culture war bullshit he would have been on their side by default. They are the ones who snubbed him not the other way around.
I get the impression that all those "Body builders are far right extremists" articles pushed Rogan over as well.
Replies: >>1056 >>1058
fitnessisFARRIGHTEXTREME.PNG
[Hide] (153.6KB, 1552x631)
>>1055
A better example.
>>1054
>Between the 'garbage' comment, his wife wearing red on election day, and the purple tie w/HUEG smile when Trump visited
Also that video of him putting on a MAGA hat for some kids.

>Why did Trump have no issues picking a VP who outshines him, then?
Now that I think about it they probably knew Harris has zero chance of winning and didn't want to waste any of their "good" people on a lost cause.

>>1055
>Body builders are far right extremists
It is an accurate correlation though. Leftists hate fitness because it requires you to do the work as an individual. It requires discipline and self ownership. You can't just use politics to steal somebody else's gains. I actually got banned from /leftypol/ for saying this so it must have hit a nerve.

thelp.jpg
[Hide] (61.7KB, 880x660)
A long time back the Mises website used to run their own forum.  We had a troll on the site named "Socialist Gerry" (Socialist Gerry -> Socialist German -> Nazi).  He was irritating, he messed up the board, but everyone replied to him all the same and he stayed around until eventually he got bored and left the site and was replaced by some other moron.

Now, even on libertarian forums, I've noticed trolls like this get banned.  But should they?

Yes, under libertarian ethics it's allowed.  Yeah, it's private property.  Private property owners can do that.  This is not an ethical argument I'm making, it's more of a cultural/moral one.  Like I get you don't want someone running naked on the libertarian party stage, but there's a matter of degree here, and I'm not asking to let communists into your neighborhood, but I am asking that maybe there's a more general moral argument that should be shared so that libertarians and others alike can just...not all turn into HOA Karens.

More generally than just the libertarian sphere, I feel like all across the internet the amount of tolerance has slipped dramatically.  I think that internet communities tend to be more and more ban happy and gatekeepy, and it's getting worse as time goes on.  This doesn't appear to be a government issue; it appears to be a cultural issue.

Personally, I'm making this post because--and this might be because I've become a worse individual over the years--but I can't really find any other places
Message too long. View the full text
31 replies and 2 files omitted. View the full thread
>>1037
Bro it's from his official website.  People can still criticize Trump without automatically being cock-sucking CNN-watching communists, they can even criticize him while still supporting him.
Section 230 bullshit:
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/agenda47/president-donald-j-trump-free-speech-policy-initiative
FISA court and whistleblower bullshit:
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/agenda47/agenda47-president-trumps-plan-to-dismantle-the-deep-state-and-return-power-to-the-american-people
In better news, Mike Pompeo is NOT going to be in the cabinet!
Replies: >>1044
>>1041
This and the Ron Paul forum are the only libertarian spaces that I know of and I'd rather post there than in any schizo'd out fascist board.
neocondeepstatedeath.jpg
[Hide] (51.8KB, 680x383)
>>1042
>In better news, Mike Pompeo is NOT going to be in the cabinet!
Nikki Haley too!

Yaaaaay, neocons get wrecked!
I've been speaking with friends of mine who supported Kamala, and am really surprised by how many of them aren't just surprised by Trump winning, but by Trump _crushingly_ winning.  There's a lot of, "How?" "I don't know anyone who supported Trump!" (I never told them) "Who are these people?" "Why were the polls so wrong?!" or just outright denial that Trump supporters exist at all.

At some point one has to realize that banning everyone off of your platform, deleting their posts, falsifying polling data, etc. is creating an echo chamber where you don't know what reality is anymore.  If you can't know what reality is anymore, you won't be able to function or plan your actions.  At some point, don't moderators, pollsters, and the media realize that they're doing this to themselves, and that it's in their best interest to have an American Glasnost?
Replies: >>1047
>>1045
leftists: billionaires and corporations are evil scumbags who will do anything to make a profit
>also leftists: let me download today's news and talking points from my favorite billionaire controlled media corporations

FRED_Inflation_Rate_-_1960_to_present.png
[Hide] (91.3KB, 1168x450)
I'm kinda depressed by how people can't even agree that printing a fuckton of money causes price inflation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021%E2%80%932023_inflation_surge
Replies: >>894 >>1030
>>821 (OP) 
Actually, if you cook the money after you print it, it doesn't cause inflation. Most of our economic problems are caused by using raw money. Raw money contains pathogens that cause economic inflation.
Replies: >>1028
>>894
Basically what they believe.
>>821 (OP) 
>people can't even agree that printing a fuckton of money causes price inflation.
A lot of propaganda goes into making sure normies don't make the link between government spending and inflation. The only way they can sell a 20 year war in Afghanistan to voters is if they think it's not costing them anything.

trustfundbaby.png
[Hide] (155.2KB, 415x250)
I've heard a theory exposited that I'd like to hear the opinion of other libertarians on:

The current rich elite are highly anticapitalist because they inherited their wealth from their parents without any work of their own.  This leads to psychological deep rooted feelings of guilt, paranoia, and fatalism.  This in turns leads to a high degree of self-hatred.  This self-hatred manifest as self-destructive behavior.  This self destructive behavior is the reason that trust fund babies are supporting socialist causes which undermine their own interests and the interests of others.

c.f. https://archive.is/0OU0i
6 replies omitted. View the full thread
>>296
>I really do think something is different about the latest generation
Ok but why does it matter. Several generations of parents worked hard and made sacrifices to build up this intergenerational wealth and now some degenerate douchebag  is wasting it. It's none of my business. It's none of your business. It is BLM style propaganda. It is a tiny insignificant occurrence that they rub in your face because they know it will trigger you because muh injustice or whatever. The simple fact is that your wealth is your property and you can give it to whoever you want including your douchebag kids.

>>297
>My counter-point: socialism has always been bourgeoise. 
Thomas Sowell has a good quote about exactly this
>The Marxist constituency has remained as narrow as the conception behind it. The Communist Manifesto, written by two bright and articulate young men without responsibility even for their own livelihoods—much less for the social consequences of their vision—has had a special appeal for successive generations of the same kinds of people. The offspring of privilege have dominated the leadership of Marxist movements from the days of Marx and Engels through Lenin, Mao, Castro, Ho Chi Minh, and their lesser counterparts around the world and down through 
Message too long. View the full text
Replies: >>311
>>306
>Ok but why does it matter. 
Because:
1 - These guys are my enemies, and I'm trying to develop a psychological profile to know them better so I can deal with them better.
2 - I don't want my kids to end up like this.
Replies: >>375
ciI2Obe0K1mY.jpeg
[Hide] (125.8KB, 1125x1133)
>>311
>1 - These guys are my enemies,
The main enemy is the money printers and those that physically protect them. Everyone else is a pawn.

>2 - I don't want my kids to end up like this.
I would make it clear from the start that your shit is not automatically their shit. Teach them that they have to work for what they want. My dad was also very clear that I am out of the house when I turn 18 whether I'm ready for it or not.

You have to teach them how money and markets work as well though. The big trap for entitled middle class brats is that they will get high grades in school and then go to college and get a masters degree and then they graduate and don't magically get a high paying job. "But I did everything right why am I working at starbucks capitalism has failed". You have to teach them that they need to give value to get value. Show them how an electrician and a plumber with no higher education makes more than a phd astrophysicist simply because the work they do is more valuable to society and the market (when it is not too fucked up by government interventions) will reward that.
This is only very tangentially related, so sorry for necroing an old thread with this, but does home ownership correlate with support for capitalism?  The idea being that in order to be a capitalist, you have to have a stake in it.
Replies: >>1029
>>922
Post-election bump.

Screenshot_2024-10-22_at_15-31-44_An_unofficial_guide_on_how_to_avoid_being_shadowbanned_r_ShadowBan.png
[Hide] (517.3KB, 2530x1102)
when you cant sign up and/or post using a vpn to protect your privacy. I hate redditors so much.
Replies: >>981
>>971 (OP) 
The whole english speaking internet is in lockdown because of the imperial elections and "muh russian bots". Things should ease up in a few weeks.
Replies: >>988
>>981
so after the election I can use reddit on a vpn?
Replies: >>1027
>>988
Well, does it work now, or do you really still want to be on plebbit?

Screenshot_2024-11-06_145136.png
[Hide] (20.2KB, 618x212)
It's so over
Replies: >>1022
>>1021 (OP) 
You unironically believe a fringe conservative journalist is telling Trump what to do.

Screenshot_20241027_184747_Brave.jpg
[Hide] (426.5KB, 1077x1649)
We'll see if that holds up.
lindell_SS.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 1114x1102)
sure he does...
Replies: >>1018 >>1019
>>1013
Yeah he doesn't
>>1013
I saw someone post this elsewhere like a week or two ago and thought it was a joke. Checked his website and had a good, long laugh. Hilarious to see WN dogwhistles in marketing.

based_paul.png
[Hide] (358.5KB, 1240x744)
To all the groypers and natsocs, which politician is talking like this? 


https://ronpaulinstitute.org/why-should-we-fight-wars-for-ukraine-and-israel/

NEET.jpg
[Hide] (46.9KB, 499x499)
Most 'ex-libertarians' weren't truly libertarian to begin with. The ones that went fascist were impulsive control freaks who want to mold society in their perfect image regardless of what anyone else wants. If you're about that, you're not a Libertarian. You're just a LARPing fagola.
13 replies and 3 files omitted. View the full thread
>>672
They try to post here and in other libertarian spaces to try and subvert. Don't let them.
we went fascist because we realized people get complacent and the only solution to that is an entity that is willing to fight for white identity 24/7 365. Until libertarians can answer the JQ they're a bunch of retards.
Replies: >>995 >>997
>>992
Who the fuck is 'we'?
I don't understand how you can spend years criticizing state power only to think it's somehow the answer when there's no precedent for that.
Replies: >>997
anW1PvATrwHE.jpeg
[Hide] (154.8KB, 1104x978)
>>992
>Until libertarians can answer the JQ
Defend your property from all sources of aggression, jews or otherwise.

Fascists are the kind of niggers who will bend over for uncle adolf let him destroy your economy, rape your country, send you to die in a foreign war and then be like
>at least it's not the jews

>>996
>I don't understand how you can spend years criticizing state power only to think it's somehow the answer
They think that if "their" guys control the state then they can get what they want.

>when there's no precedent for that
The precedent is that the moment "your guy" gets power he's not your guy anymore and exploits you for his own benefit just like every guy before him. The state will never be on your side.

1710513611734336.jpg
[Hide] (172.2KB, 720x784)
19 replies and 2 files omitted. View the full thread
How would the NAP be enforced?
Replies: >>980
>>927
I can't tell if trolling or retarded
>>976
>How would the NAP be enforced?
By you. Only you are responsible for defending yourself and your property. If you can't do it alone then ask friends for help. If friends aren't enough then pay professionals to help.

One way security could work without a state is through insurance companies. A nigger steals your car. The insurance company pays you the money. If they still want to make a profit they now have an incentive to track down the nigger and get either the car or the money back from him.

But the most profitable thing for insurance companies would be if there was no crime at all. So they will do the math and figure out the optimal amount of preventative crimefighting to do to maximize profits. That's an example of how market forces can be used to give everyone the right incentives.
Replies: >>987 >>989
>>980
fucking retard
>>980
you tracking down a nigger and using violence to get your car back is violating the NAP. The NAP is the most jewish concept I have ever heard in my life. Libertarians are cucks until they abandon this part of their ideology. Also in a truly libertarian society you would be steam rolled by jews so you'd have to be prepared to fight back to remain free, at all times, cause kikes are constantly scheming. So how does the NAP fit into that fucking faggot? 

Not to mention a libertarian society wouldn't work anyway with non whites.

Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

Select the solid/filled icons
- news - rules - faq -
jschan 1.4.1