>>999
>>1001
>>1003
>Implying white neets get welfare
Welfare exists to buy votes from brown people and prop up the false illusion of equality so they can import more of them to do the same. Most unemployed white people don't get social security easily or at all, and if they do not nearly to the same degree. Seperate from such, if one lives amongst their parents, the only relevant bill they impact is utilities, which is a drop in the bucket compared to: municipal taxes, property taxes, obligatory insurance, liscense renewal fees, mortgage rates/property tax, income tax etc etc. You're deluding yourself if you think this has any societal impact relatively. On the contrary, those same fees you pay on a daily basis, the funds of which are invariably used by the government, whether it be regional or federal, to enact things which relate to your peoples decay does have a substantial societal impact. It's true that the inaction of NEETs solves nothing, but they have the possibility to go other directions, whereas wageslaves, taking the path of least resistance and submitting all their time for some career in order to become a "productive" member of society have bound themselves to whatever that entails. The consequent dependencies render them ideologically manipulable or nullifiable; they wont do anything that would risk losing their career, and that career has bound them only to be capable of living in areas where it may be enacted. And more practically most have rendered themselves useless, spending the majority of their time in/to work they now don't have any to develop themselves. But why bother? After all, if you have money to pay someone to do something why would you do it yourself? Except that, now you can't do anything at all by yourself, and are only allowed technological solutions someone else can maintain for you. And then you preach of sufficiency to the NEET, while 80% of you can't even afford to reproduce without dipping into the lower class while turning over 40% of your income so brown immigrants can, all while the Amish keep laughing with their 5 children at age 30.
There is nothing praiseworthy of working in modern society unless you use those funds to achieve a superior state of affairs that removes your future generations from needing to do the same, or to support some creative effort. Nor is there anything impressive about the high majority of positions.
As an alluded aside; the fact that libertarianism is entirely focused on economics rather than technology is especially dissapointing in light of the aforementioned, and itself is why you people will never get anywhere. And no, I'm not the fasci above. Are the ideals correct? Yes. But good luck fighting the entire elites economic interests, in a stage where they can manipulate every person/organization of, even you, as opposed to, attaining your own food and building an efficient building that doesn't cost 12000 zogbucks a month. Rather then preaching about the next crypto that will topple fiat currency or the reintroduction of the gold standard, you should be relaxing building codes and advocating for the usage of renewabless, because their ability to scale down efficiently and remain independent of city infastructure (and as such allow you to build a better building than what the city contracts) is their true benefit and the environmental aspects, which are a bonus, afford you a substantial audience to preach to.