New Thread[×]
Name
Email
Subject
Message
Files Max 5 files32MB total
Tegaki
Password
Captcha*Select the solid/filled icons
[New Thread]


Screenshot_20241027_184747_Brave.jpg
[Hide] (426.5KB, 1077x1649)
We'll see if that holds up.
Replies: >>1592
lindell_SS.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 1114x1102)
sure he does...
Replies: >>1018 >>1019
>>1013
Yeah he doesn't
>>1013
I saw someone post this elsewhere like a week or two ago and thought it was a joke. Checked his website and had a good, long laugh. Hilarious to see WN dogwhistles in marketing.
>>1011 (OP) 
This didn't age well.
>JD Vance
literally who
>cellphone screenshot (of twitter?)
>bumping the news from 2024
homosexuality

1485570492971.jpeg
[Hide] (114.9KB, 960x947)
Why target Charlie Kirk, of all people? How could anybody feel remotely threatened by this guy? Were his debating skillz really that good? It just doesn't make any sense. I feel as though I am living in an alternative reality, that diverged from coherency sometime during or after the 2016 election. Or maybe, this has all been a fever dream. It just doesn't feel real, guys.
6 replies and 7 files omitted. View the full thread
Replies: >>1586 + 2 earlier
51bfef3ed2cf71e255475239b58a2ca4ab84dd83f9f9e66d917f787b6c5a5667.png
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1080x2460)
598e98e26afd6a54be0b301bdb6ad20938d76a0c40f70cff99f28ad8c1c61f02.png
[Hide] (1.4MB, 1080x2460)
How
Replies: >>1497
>>1496
>>1495
Lighting
ya retard
Replies: >>1498
>>1497
Yet none of the white cops turn black dumbfuck
OMG HE GOT SHOT WHILE DEFENDING THE 2ND AMENDMENT.
>>1487 (OP) 
He's a Martin Luther King figure.
They made him to be a sacrifice. The problem is he started to go outside his programming and question certain "truths" so they may have pushed forward his martyrdom.

pic.png
[Hide] (2.3MB, 6460x3642)
gvt.mp4
[Hide] (11.1MB, 640x346, 03:16)
Worldwide Drug Legalization is not happening, Austrian economics and Chicago school economics have been a massive waste of time. You're all bullshitting yourselves, it's been more than 50 years, free market economics cannot get through government policies or influence them. 
A "libertarian" NGO protesting every once in 5-10 years will never accomplish anything. Social conservative retardation continues with the anti-drug fearmongering. Nothing is doable, this state tyranny will continue until the world ends and no amount of voting, protesting, rioting will change it. 
There isn't even anyone to riot about it because the propaganda runs so deep into making what has been a relationship between humans and drugs for thousands of years into a taboo that any effort to push for change is either immediately opposed by the majority of the population (usually angry statist religious retards) or is eventually recriminalized and never protected by a constitutional law (like the case in Thailand). 

No amount of effort can put an end to these draconian laws or make society less retarded enough to know legalizing drugs won't destroy civilization. As long as democracy exists retardation will prevail and as long as states exist so will this repression. Worldwide market liberalization is a distant pipe dream, state repressions are a fact and they will remain as long as they see it fit to persecute drug users and dealers, ultimately this black market they create is also intertwined with th
Message too long. View the full text
3 replies and 1 file omitted. View the full thread
Replies: >>1470 >>1583 + 1 earlier
>Electing a politician will never give you freedom
...but like...isn't it pretty clear in Milei's case that Argentina is WAY more free and prosperous than what was happening before? Isn't there some qote from Rothbard talking about how if you have two bills you have to choose between, you choose the one that gives more liberty?
Replies: >>1464
>>1455
As long as the state exists there can be no freedom.
Replies: >>1467
>>1464
O....k.....? Are we talking about the same thing anymore? Why is your response a response to what I said?
>>1448 (OP) 
id be inclined to agree, thats why im influenced by vanguardists
>>1448 (OP) 
2 words: neurotechnology.

844de9c373ad9fab296f13ca27ada9c6.jpg
[Hide] (9.5KB, 284x284)
I see libertarian sentiment slowly making a comeback while this culture war has been going on and reactionaries have routinely disappointed people by either going way too far or just being obvious grifts. The Mises people (Institute, not Caucus) are still going strong. This all has shades of the Paleo Strategy, which Murray Rothbard and Lew Rockwell would regret soon after the paleocons had irreconcilable differences with them and compromised on far too much.
13 replies and 3 files omitted. View the full thread
Replies: >>733 >>1562 + 1 earlier
>>727
>did you read it?
No why would I read something that's more than 10 lines.

>libertarians can learn a lot from traditionalists something something theocracy
No. On the surface traditional values like family first, gender roles etc. are superior to progressive values like everyone should be a gay trans feminist. But then the jesusfags start talking about demons and nephilim and muh prophecy and everything-I-don't-like-is-satanism and you realize they are just as mentally ill and detached from reality as the rainbow cult.

In my mind they are equivalent at this point. If you want to cut off your dick and pretend you're a woman then go ahead. If you want to worship your childish sky daddy then go ahead. Either we work together on the principles of liberty and then you fuck off. Or you skip straight to fucking off part now. Either way I don't give a fuck about your so called "culture".

I do like your picrel though
>>702 (OP) 
The libertarian to fascist pipeline was just a psyop to get libertarians back into statism.
Nolan_chart.png
[Hide] (54.3KB, 288x279)
"Libertarian/Fascist pipeline" was a crazy idea from the start.
>>702 (OP) 
While I've heard of the Libertarian to Fascist pipeline I've definitely heard of the Libertarian to Monarchist pipeline
Replies: >>1563
>>1562
While I've *never* heard of the Libertarian to Fascist pipeline I've definitely heard of the Libertarian to Monarchist pipeline. 
Made a mistake my bad

1710513611734336.jpg
[Hide] (172.2KB, 720x784)
23 replies and 2 files omitted. View the full thread
>>980
you tracking down a nigger and using violence to get your car back is violating the NAP. The NAP is the most jewish concept I have ever heard in my life. Libertarians are cucks until they abandon this part of their ideology. Also in a truly libertarian society you would be steam rolled by jews so you'd have to be prepared to fight back to remain free, at all times, cause kikes are constantly scheming. So how does the NAP fit into that fucking faggot? 

Not to mention a libertarian society wouldn't work anyway with non whites.
In my opinion, the principle of non-aggression should only exist for living straight white men.
More specifically only for postpubescent heterosexual male homosapiens of non-jewish europoid-caucasoid indo-aryan nordic-germanic ethnicities, who must have pink nipples and either eyes or hair that are not black or brown in color. 

Anything and anyone who doesnt fall into the above category should be considered property, not people, they will not be protected by the laws of the NAP except in the capacity of being the property of one who does qualify for personhood.

However I may make an exception for postpubescent heterosexual males of the east-asian ethnicities, who may have non-pink nipples, and eyes and hair that are black or brown in color. Honorary status and all that.

All races other than the two mentioned above should be made extinct, especially the niggers and most especially the jews.
whatiftho.jpg
[Hide] (17.8KB, 750x212)
>>634
Bro out here honestly answering questions like some sort of boomer virgin autist not realizing that this is a thread to just ignore these comments and post dank memes while ignoring each others' points.
Conversation is dead bro. lol. lmao, even.
glowie.jpg
[Hide] (31.4KB, 680x889)
Even if we assume that animals for some reason have rights, you'd be hard pressed to argue that animals are capable of understanding and respecting human rights. And if animals don't respect human rights, why should humans respect animal rights?

jdaycare.jpg
[Hide] (150.6KB, 1082x1181)
Why do "capitalist" megacorps support giant daycares for overeducated women?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lDTdLQnSQo&pp=ygUUbHVrZSBzbWl0aCBmYWtlIGpvYnM%3D
What is the libertarian solution for how terrible modern work is?
Replies: >>1359 >>1392
>>1357 (OP) 
So you've finally figured out what feminism really is?
Replies: >>1360
>>1359
What a Jewish rhetorical question.
>>1357 (OP) 
>What is the libertarian solution for how terrible modern work is?
End the Fed. Without fiat money printing there is no funding for any of these zombie corpos that provide zero value to anyone.

End welfare. If women can't leech off the state then they will be forced to take family more seriously.
"overeducated". Lmao.

Literally a latent Islamist complaining about women having education and participating in the market economy lmao.

lz.jpg
[Hide] (21.2KB, 900x900)
Liquidzulu is an anarcho-capitalist that makes really good content on youtube.

I made a SimpleX Chat group so we can discuss the things he talks about. Come and join at https://smp6.simplex.im/g#Bg1iqFhqWagBw0yOgJ3u5eovzPW-Nw8QNNth5erBMpY


If you want to check out his content:
Youtube: https://inv.nadeko.net/channel/UCTf0py7ryuSldOsDm4abSsg
Twitter: https://xcancel.com/liquid2ulu#m
2 replies omitted. View the full thread
>>1517
Are you poisoning the well?
>>1517
no
>>1517
Talking about the 'pdf file' is bad form to  real libertarians. It's the ultimate ad hominem to stop libertarianism in fact.
Thoughts on the Liquidzulu v. Dave Smith debate?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrD2IDme7Lk
Replies: >>1553
>>1542
Dave Smith lost. He has very little understanding of philosophy to even understand the issue.

fuckboomers.jpg
[Hide] (25.4KB, 639x325)
Aren't libertarians in a key position to co-opt all the Boomer hate going on?
- Social security and medicare are a HUGE and OBVIOUS direct wealth transfers from young people to old people.
- Why is medical care so awful? Fucking old people's medical regulations.
- Who makes all the NIMBY laws to fuck over private property rights to keep home prices up: old people.
Like you can just go down the list blaming every absolutely terrible government intervention on Boomers. You can easily make the narrative of, "They destroyed the future when they were young, and now that they're old they're going to continue to do so."
4 replies and 1 file omitted. View the full thread
Replies: >>1504 + 1 earlier
>>1323
It looks like all age groups trending together except on housing, Canada, and Trump. A weird trio, but our timeline has really been off the rails since the Kennedy assassination.
Replies: >>1507
imthinkingitover.png
[Hide] (154.2KB, 304x492)
>>1319 (OP) 
It occurs to me that you might be able to use Israel/Zionism as a wedge against boomers.
You want to support Israel? To afford that, we're going to need to cut social security and medicare.
Don't want to do that? Then we're going to need to tax someone, and the richest segment of the population is...boomers.
So, boomers, your money, or Israel?
Replies: >>1508
cbb1e3c0d0665fbec3b33ba55fb815439140755a0aca0c0c2e241c4d64812676.jpg
[Hide] (57.5KB, 313x517)
>>1337
>>1323
>old want housing to stay expensive while young can't affod
<fuck you I've got mine! 
>federal budget 
<Now son lemme tell you(r)/government what to do about debt because I am so wise with shekels I earned from when times were good in yesteryear!
This shit make me  so fucken mad
>make canda have better healthcare but it's okay for it to not be a good place to live implicaton also
Well does that not just sum up how only the good die young? 
>>1322
It was an ad hominem thing. "If you don't vote right wing you are a pedo/mtf/racist/etc". Racist towards whites anyway, and also a misandrist. After they switch witches from left to right then what? lgbt bashing it appears, small group full of limp wrested men, easy target. They want to undo what boomers did in the 1960s but leave the feminist and nigger rights parts in that are the actual bigger problem.
>>1504
>You want to support Israel? To afford that, we're going to need to cut social security and medicare.
Doesn't work because they unironically think that when the government does stuff it is free.
https://archive.is/VKaD0
8 more years until social security bankruptcy.

NYCSocialist.jpg
[Hide] (5.2KB, 193x262)
In the marketplace of ideas, libertarianism has fucking LOST.

QuashingIdeas.png
[Hide] (1MB, 1387x3483)
How can libertarians hope to win the war of ideas if the State can just endlessly subsidize propaganda in a hopelessly complicated web?
4 replies and 5 files omitted. View the full thread
>>1462
What do you mean by a market? Do you mean a free one with no rules? If so, sheep follow the ads and the powers that be that like the status quo keep them following such ads. You have to already be rich to have the ads so it's a thing they do that the sheep enable. If they let free market happen then new money happens and that is stealing to them, the powers that be don't want power vacuumes and such. The sheep just care that the item stays the same themselves. Another chocolate bar phone, another cheese burger that's the exact same as the last, normalfaggots hate variety and freedom and choice and customization and so do the powers that be as that sorta freedom threatens the status quo. Fascism and Communism is all about being athoritarian and the authority is the powers. 

Also, what people say is usually meaningless. Actions speak louder than words. Behind every businessman is a politician's ethics. No real rich guy cares about idealogy, just power, and to keep it they lie to sheep. Lies are advertising too you know. 

I don't see why you would say that's the best way to maintain their wealth. The best way to maintain wealth is to have it passed down to you. Nepotism. They hate new money. They hate the free market.  They don't want a plebeian to become a new competitor, a new king, a new rich family to make their wealth thinner than it already is as they have to share finite resources. If some day 
Message too long. View the full text
>>1462
> why are so many leaders, particularly business leaders, not even ideologically supporting markets even though that's the best way that they can maintain their wealth?
A free market won't maintain their wealth. A free market means unrestricted competition. It means you have to keep innovating and providing value to customers everyday or you will lose your place to companies that do. Why fight for survival everyday when you can bribe the government to lock your competition out of the market forever. Every copro spends huge sums of money every year on lobbying legislators for more market regulations not less for exactly that reason.
Replies: >>1512
>>1510
>A free market won't maintain their wealth.
What.
Replies: >>1513
>>1512
>What.
If the only reason you're rich is because of your political connections then you will crash and burn in a free market where you actually have to deliver value to customers to get paid.
Replies: >>1516
>>1513
I apologize for being dumb about this, but if you're already rich, then an index fund in a free market should more than sustain your wealth, no?

Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

Select the solid/filled icons
- news - rules - faq -
jschan 1.7.3