/liberty/ - Austro-Libertarianism

>>1607
Having a hierarchal power structure is antithetical to libertarianism and slavery and wages and relgiion all go hand in hand. Only a fool would question this. It's not natural as we were hunters and gatherers for the majority of our existence and so this goes against our psychology, the ones that have automomous thought patterns and that can reflect anyway, the 50 to 30 percent with internal dialogs.

*autonomous 
*religion

>>1607
>The government was simultaneously operated by all three forms of government (monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy) as represented by their king, the house of lords, and the house of commons. For whatever reason, having all three function at once stopped any form from grasping full control. And it is almost like the negatives cancelled each other out, and so the nation got to enjoy the benefits of the positives of each form of government.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_powers
I don't know if you typed all that instead of just saying "we used to have a proper separation of powers" because you found most people encounter it as a novel concept so you're trying to speak to the lowest common denominator, or because this isn't being taught in schools anymore.

>>1606
Man, this post can be aggressively summarized. Let me do that.
>I agree. I would say that people realized that libertarianism, or freedom and liberty in general, can only exist as an in-group standard, but attempting to apply it as a universal standard can only lead to bad things. And I think a lot of anons realized there needs to be some form of power structure to support and protect it which is why to drifted into authoritarian ideologies (socialism, fascism, neo-liberalism, monarchism etc.) 
Only white men support libertarianism. So you need to stop immigration and/or enforce emigration and/or stop females from voting. So that made some people authoritarian.
>And I don't think they are completely wrong. Here is an observation I made recently in thinking about England, old England, which was respected by all the other European nations for its standards of liberty, rights, and freedom. So, the question I asked myself is why did it exists. From what I could see, if the England had a government/political structure that stopped centralization. The government was simultaneously operated by all three forms of government (monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy) as represented by their king, the house of lords, and the house of commons. For whatever reason, having all three function at once stopped any form from grasping full control. And it is almos

>>1613
I could have used separation of power, but these days, it basically means "I want your side to have no power, even when it should, and my side to have all the power, even when it shouldnt". It like how separation of church and state essentially means "there should be no church, and everything should be controlled by the state". So, I just have to write like I am introducing new concepts so there can be no confusion.

lindell_SS.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 1114x1102)

sure he does...

>>1013
Yeah he doesn't

>>1013
I saw someone post this elsewhere like a week or two ago and thought it was a joke. Checked his website and had a good, long laugh. Hilarious to see WN dogwhistles in marketing.

>>1011 (OP) 
This didn't age well.

>JD Vance
literally who
>cellphone screenshot (of twitter?)
>bumping the news from 2024
homosexuality

51bfef3ed2cf71e255475239b58a2ca4ab84dd83f9f9e66d917f787b6c5a5667.png
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1080x2460)

598e98e26afd6a54be0b301bdb6ad20938d76a0c40f70cff99f28ad8c1c61f02.png
[Hide] (1.4MB, 1080x2460)

How

>>1496
>>1495
Lighting
ya retard

>>1497
Yet none of the white cops turn black dumbfuck

OMG HE GOT SHOT WHILE DEFENDING THE 2ND AMENDMENT.

>>1487 (OP) 
He's a Martin Luther King figure.
They made him to be a sacrifice. The problem is he started to go outside his programming and question certain "truths" so they may have pushed forward his martyrdom.

>Electing a politician will never give you freedom
...but like...isn't it pretty clear in Milei's case that Argentina is WAY more free and prosperous than what was happening before? Isn't there some qote from Rothbard talking about how if you have two bills you have to choose between, you choose the one that gives more liberty?

>>1455
As long as the state exists there can be no freedom.

>>1464
O....k.....? Are we talking about the same thing anymore? Why is your response a response to what I said?

>>1448 (OP) 
id be inclined to agree, thats why im influenced by vanguardists

>>1448 (OP) 
2 words: neurotechnology.

>>727
>did you read it?
No why would I read something that's more than 10 lines.

>libertarians can learn a lot from traditionalists something something theocracy
No. On the surface traditional values like family first, gender roles etc. are superior to progressive values like everyone should be a gay trans feminist. But then the jesusfags start talking about demons and nephilim and muh prophecy and everything-I-don't-like-is-satanism and you realize they are just as mentally ill and detached from reality as the rainbow cult.

In my mind they are equivalent at this point. If you want to cut off your dick and pretend you're a woman then go ahead. If you want to worship your childish sky daddy then go ahead. Either we work together on the principles of liberty and then you fuck off. Or you skip straight to fucking off part now. Either way I don't give a fuck about your so called "culture".

I do like your picrel though

>>702 (OP) 
The libertarian to fascist pipeline was just a psyop to get libertarians back into statism.

Nolan_chart.png
[Hide] (54.3KB, 288x279)

"Libertarian/Fascist pipeline" was a crazy idea from the start.

>>702 (OP) 
While I've heard of the Libertarian to Fascist pipeline I've definitely heard of the Libertarian to Monarchist pipeline

>>1562
While I've *never* heard of the Libertarian to Fascist pipeline I've definitely heard of the Libertarian to Monarchist pipeline. 
Made a mistake my bad

>>980
you tracking down a nigger and using violence to get your car back is violating the NAP. The NAP is the most jewish concept I have ever heard in my life. Libertarians are cucks until they abandon this part of their ideology. Also in a truly libertarian society you would be steam rolled by jews so you'd have to be prepared to fight back to remain free, at all times, cause kikes are constantly scheming. So how does the NAP fit into that fucking faggot? 

Not to mention a libertarian society wouldn't work anyway with non whites.

In my opinion, the principle of non-aggression should only exist for living straight white men.
More specifically only for postpubescent heterosexual male homosapiens of non-jewish europoid-caucasoid indo-aryan nordic-germanic ethnicities, who must have pink nipples and either eyes or hair that are not black or brown in color. 

Anything and anyone who doesnt fall into the above category should be considered property, not people, they will not be protected by the laws of the NAP except in the capacity of being the property of one who does qualify for personhood.

However I may make an exception for postpubescent heterosexual males of the east-asian ethnicities, who may have non-pink nipples, and eyes and hair that are black or brown in color. Honorary status and all that.

All races other than the two mentioned above should be made extinct, especially the niggers and most especially the jews.

whatiftho.jpg
[Hide] (17.8KB, 750x212)

>>634
Bro out here honestly answering questions like some sort of boomer virgin autist not realizing that this is a thread to just ignore these comments and post dank memes while ignoring each others' points.
Conversation is dead bro. lol. lmao, even.

Even if we assume that animals for some reason have rights, you'd be hard pressed to argue that animals are capable of understanding and respecting human rights. And if animals don't respect human rights, why should humans respect animal rights?

>>1357 (OP) 
So you've finally figured out what feminism really is?

>>1359
What a Jewish rhetorical question.

>>1357 (OP) 
>What is the libertarian solution for how terrible modern work is?
End the Fed. Without fiat money printing there is no funding for any of these zombie corpos that provide zero value to anyone.

End welfare. If women can't leech off the state then they will be forced to take family more seriously.

"overeducated". Lmao.

Literally a latent Islamist complaining about women having education and participating in the market economy lmao.

>>1517
Are you poisoning the well?

>>1517
no

>>1517
Talking about the 'pdf file' is bad form to  real libertarians. It's the ultimate ad hominem to stop libertarianism in fact.

Thoughts on the Liquidzulu v. Dave Smith debate?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrD2IDme7Lk

>>1542
Dave Smith lost. He has very little understanding of philosophy to even understand the issue.

>>1323
It looks like all age groups trending together except on housing, Canada, and Trump. A weird trio, but our timeline has really been off the rails since the Kennedy assassination.

imthinkingitover.png
[Hide] (154.2KB, 304x492)

>>1319 (OP) 
It occurs to me that you might be able to use Israel/Zionism as a wedge against boomers.
You want to support Israel? To afford that, we're going to need to cut social security and medicare.
Don't want to do that? Then we're going to need to tax someone, and the richest segment of the population is...boomers.
So, boomers, your money, or Israel?

cbb1e3c0d0665fbec3b33ba55fb815439140755a0aca0c0c2e241c4d64812676.jpg
[Hide] (57.5KB, 313x517)

>>1337
>>1323
>old want housing to stay expensive while young can't affod
<fuck you I've got mine! 
>federal budget 
<Now son lemme tell you(r)/government what to do about debt because I am so wise with shekels I earned from when times were good in yesteryear!
This shit make me  so fucken mad
>make canda have better healthcare but it's okay for it to not be a good place to live implicaton also
Well does that not just sum up how only the good die young? 
>>1322
It was an ad hominem thing. "If you don't vote right wing you are a pedo/mtf/racist/etc". Racist towards whites anyway, and also a misandrist. After they switch witches from left to right then what? lgbt bashing it appears, small group full of limp wrested men, easy target. They want to undo what boomers did in the 1960s but leave the feminist and nigger rights parts in that are the actual bigger problem.

>>1504
>You want to support Israel? To afford that, we're going to need to cut social security and medicare.
Doesn't work because they unironically think that when the government does stuff it is free.

https://archive.is/VKaD0
8 more years until social security bankruptcy.