/k/ - Weapons and Militaria

>>19116
Why dont we just....give peas a chance?

>>19102
They can't fight their own wars anyway. When Saddam invaded the Gulf they asked America for help. And they couldn't even deal with the Houthis.

ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (61.6KB, 1179x1441) Reverse

um guise it's going back up.

>>19120
Short it.

>>19120
YEEEHAWWWW

eurocuck.mp4
[Hide] (2.2MB, 1280x720, 00:23)

>>18939
File is talking about Ursula Der Leyen president of the EU for our non-european stalkers

erdogun.png
[Hide] (643.9KB, 2000x1000) Reverse

>>18939
Tier list time!
Do we have any non-cucked EU "leaders"?
Seems multiple attendees per country got a gun, so there might be lots. Does somebody have a list?

>>19007
I bet when they say the assault pistol they shat their pants. Triggering a minor PTSD.

>>19007
this needs to be a banner

The_Day_of_the_Pupae.jpg
[Hide] (646KB, 1680x1050) Reverse

ARE YOU PREPARED FOR THE FUTURE OF COMBAT???

media_Ghl30JwWoAAsee6.webp
[Hide] (52.4KB, 680x498) Reverse

>>19084
I assume they're covering it up as not to stoke the orange retard into dragging us into WW3.

>>19084
At least he went to a war zone, and experienced firsthand what he was asking generations to do for his policies. 
All of the kikes' puppets need to go blindly to their end. Fuck him, and everything he stood for.

>>19084
I take it he died in Ukraine or in transit. But the chance of dying in the drone factory should be improbable too. Politicians tour for the photoshoot. He would have no reason to stay there for hours, and his itinerary would likely mean multiple stops elsewhere. Presuming the pictures are real, he completed the tour and got his pictures. The warhawks would bounce on this in a second if he died in that factory. That conspiracies about him being poisoned being the more mainstream, at least that it is picked up by media, tell that the warhawks do not have the evidence to pursue too much besides the Russians poisoned him.

5270a382a1382de37aa3766ec745f703a5cdf1d081ba6563023719b9ac60ae2e.gif
[Hide] (1.8MB, 498x278) Reverse

>>19092
Maybe he was sampling some hohol boys and died of a heart attack.

>>19094
>coverup isn't the drone factory, disappearing aid, or collusion between Ukraine and Israel to move munitions
<coverup is Graham dying of a heart attack in the Biden suite
Please, Lord, oh pleeeeease....

3276f15583100775a7b32dba1e6c007981356601ee0c9e99991f170b9de2be06.mp4
[Hide] (7.9MB, 1280x720, 01:19)

>years
>and they aren't ready for drones

9304cd8c5c5718a38231f5a54089a6293b6ff37547f634a86339235a1b4bf439.mp4
[Hide] (14.8MB, 1080x1920, 00:25)

TestTEXT

WQGc6XEdig0lwTG2.mp4
[Hide] (9.3MB, 1920x1080, 00:34)

t2EaCRIqWLYsCU4w.mp4
[Hide] (3.9MB, 1080x1080, 00:12)

If you shot at 360 degrees no drones will hit you, artyon.

>>19076
But Ivan, what if drone comes counterclockwise?

2f2bfa4afaa2a9f9989231d1ab8fc4bf32475dda8cb6b38d2be2418c7d5c55d1.jpg
[Hide] (37.6KB, 612x408) Reverse

>>19077
blyatt

>"the era of one-sided deals is OVER. We told you: keep your word or pay the price. Reality is knocking."
>from the Persian negotiator
Fun really is really back on the menu. How long until gas skyrockets again?

>>19057
>'«Lindsey Graham died in Kiev, not Washington, DC.»'
LMAO, I wanna habeeb.
https://news-pravda.com/world/2026/07/12/2436936.html

>>19086
>He was visiting a drone factory in Kiev that was hit by the Russians. He did not have enough time to depart Ukraine on Saturday morning, take the train to Poland and then catch a flight back to DC.
>Senior folks at the Pentagon are talking about Senator Graham dying during an inspection of a drone factory in Kiev.
That is a remarkable argument.i too, "wanna baheeb".

>>19087
SUDDEN ILLNESS

>>19088
I will be completely honest. The worst of "neoconservative" politicians getting got in one of the wars they promoted pleases me. Shame it wasn't for this kike war.

>>13640
Not really relevant when using a torpedo but yes and also yes the tsar bomb was just a stunt.

13b45b6f57d7d9c9484e70ec24fe839f17727071076341297_original.jpg
[Hide] (53.2KB, 1080x608) Reverse

North Korea Could Overwhelm US Missile Defense With Nuclear Strike
>North Korea is rapidly expanding its nuclear capabilities and may be nearing a point where it can challenge the effectiveness of US missile defense systems.
>According to Bloomberg on April 29, current estimates suggest Pyongyang possesses around 50 nuclear warheads and has the capacity to produce fissile material for up to 20 additional warheads annually.
>The report highlights concerns around the US Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) system, which is designed to intercept intercontinental ballistic missiles. The system currently includes 44 interceptors deployed in Alaska and California, with plans to expand by an additional 20.
>However, intercepting a single incoming missile typically requires launching at least two interceptors, limiting the system’s capacity during a large-scale attack.
>Under these conditions, Bloomberg reports that a simultaneous launch of approximately 20 intercontinental ballistic missiles could potentially exhaust available US interceptors.
>North Korea’s Hwasong-series missiles are identified as a key component of this threat, particularly when combined with the country’s growing stockpile of warheads.

>>16870
Ok, mental note if one day I took over my shithole nation: have at least 100 nukes and throw 70 to israel and 30 to the usa.

>>18505
If you mean armoured vehicles I think so. Being able to over pressurise the hull seems to be a standard feature now for pretty much everyone not just NATO.

https://ews.kylemcdonald.net/ 
Found this website that tracks billionaire's business planes around the world and tries to give an estimate level of an imminent nuclear holocaust.

>>18722
This isn't me, btw.

>>18648
> talk to sturgeon if you want to take over the board or just vol
I'm actually considering this now. I was a vol for /k/ back on Anoncafe btw. This is an important board IMHO.

>>18724
I wasn't trying to pose as you at all. Perhaps I should've created a tripcode, but whatever. I hope you weren't the fed /k/ goy, but I don't assume you were.

>>18725
>I hope you weren't the fed /k/ goy, but I don't assume you were.
LOL. No I was one of the first to plead with the Admins on Anoncafe to boot that POS.  :D

>>18724
Which one? I was a vol for the board as well lmao.

>>18844
Chobitsu.

Also the stress in words doesn't seem "random" like most Russian teachers tell you there's definitely a pattern I can't explain, but I can sometimes  feel where the stress is

>>17633
give this a shot...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFaL03SKEzE

It has English "Training wheels" but since it's an Akira Kurosawa thought you might enjoy it.

ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (4.3MB, 1920x1280) Reverse

>FCAS broke
Given the Eurofighter programme's history and the general bankruptcy of western Yurope this was well within expectation, but did strelok lose another source of DOT&E-style humor or could it have resulted in something that moderately resembled an aircraft?
inb4 Lockheeb executive handrubbing in the distance.

I have a Ruger 22/45 Mk III that is factory drilled and tapped.  I have been thinking about a dot sight for it.  I am not seeing a lot of good choices in dot mounts.  There's sketchy looking 3D printed plastic "mounts" that look like they'd crumble to dust the instant you tightened the screws sufficiently to make the sight stop flopping around, "no gunsmithing" dovetail mounts requiring you to have access to a hydraulic press to smash the rear sight out of its slot, hopefully without bending the receiver in the process, "one size fits all" mounts with two dozen holes in them and no recoil lugs, Noblex footprint mounts, Pic rails, Weaver rails, and all manner of other assorted oddities.  I think a compact RMSc dot type sight with a nice low deck height would be ideal.  I am having trouble finding one that's in stock and doesn't cost more than the sight I'll use, though.  Does anyone here have any firsthand experience with this stuff?  Thanks.

hello, anons I have written some references on my backpack in Russian but the rain smeared some of the text. I am idiot for writing in permanent marker thinking it's permanent, now I can't remove the stains and the text is completely gone. Don't want to take a picture because I don't want to get doxed.

Was the decision to resume unrestricted submarine warfare by the German Empire in WW1 reasonable/warranted when it was made?

>>18360
From a strategic perspective absolutely. It  was having real detrimental effects and was close to starving Britain out of the war by the beginning of 1918. That combined with the capitulation of Russia made it a fair gamble to see if they could actually knock out the allies on the western front before the US could properly mobilise.

>>18360
Of course.  What British propaganda of the time called "unrestricted submarine warfare" was everybody's SOP just two decades later.  By 1942 US submarines were surfacing to fire their deck guns at sampans off China because they might be carrying supplies for the Japanese, and no more was heard about "unrestricted submarine warfare."  It's almost like what is and isn't muh "war crimes" depends on whether you win.

>>18712
>no more was heard about "unrestricted submarine warfare."  It's almost like what is and isn't muh "war crimes" depends on whether you win.
I'm going to be lazy and just copy kikepedia, but the long story short is that Nimitz saved Dönitz by plainly admitting that the US was doing the same:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_D%C3%B6nitz#Nuremberg_war_crimes_trials
>His sentence on unrestricted submarine warfare was not assessed because of similar actions by the Allies. In particular, the British Admiralty, on 8 May 1940, had ordered all vessels in the Skagerrak sunk on sight, and Admiral Chester W. Nimitz, wartime commander-in-chief of the United States Pacific Fleet, stated the US Navy had waged unrestricted submarine warfare against Japan in the Pacific from the day the US officially entered the war. Thus, Dönitz was not charged with waging unrestricted submarine warfare against unarmed neutral shipping by ordering all ships in designated areas in international waters to be sunk without warning.
Most German generals could have just walked away from those trials if there were more people like Nimitz amongst the allies. Not to mention that if Nürnberg was really about meting out justice, the 

>>18716
Like every other aspect of US military and foreign policy between 1933 and around 1946, it was done to please Stalin, who loved him some show trials.  Never forget that this was just after half a million working-class White American men were enslaved by their own government and sent to their deaths to prop up Josef Stalin and install Mao T'se-Tung and Ho Chi Minh.

I don't know whether US entry into the war could have been prevented, realistically.  Japanese territorial ambitions in the Far East specifically and explicitly included the Philippines, then US territory.  Some will claim that the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was the direct and predictable result of eight consecutive years of calculated provocations, denunciations, and ultimatums from the Rosenfelt Administration.   There is truth in this.  FDR was desperate for a war and worked very hard to bring about conditions for US participation in the war that the whole world saw coming years before the fact, preferably on the side of ((( the Tribe ))).  But even if the US had not gotten a Red regime eager for a nice long expensive bloody war to get rid of working-class males who were surplus to requirements and give peasantry foreign enemies to talk about as a distraction from their own government's corruption and ineptitude, the Japanese plans for a Greater East Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere were real and went back to the 1