/k/ - Weapons and Militaria

What happened with the new Iran thread?
>>20281
>either a schzio spammer, or he's an agentic AI bot.
I think he's simply a boomer who thinks imageboards work like usenet.

>>20281
no he's real, he's a forum user, he's just a retard

>>20281
>>20282
That's a bit harsh, I didn't mind his boomerific posts i actually liked them. Can't comment on flooding because I didn't see it.

879f2fb4104f16d2fdc5b9278f419e786fe1341f28b03804f848481503931242.gif
[Hide] (5.4MB, 498x373) Reverse

>>20281
>I've been working

1545a0bdd584bd4697eef50f3d13debfbccb6068e65761f515271d54c5c48f46.png
[Hide] (174.6KB, 1421x622) Reverse

a2cb1da822b88fcb1d16d9fdfbeb2081b2775293482fd696324a72912ab376ba.png
[Hide] (116.3KB, 524x863) Reverse

7a873baf13b1534cdc85fad850b260b7664167e34f7253f7f2078ebe27d6ff26.png
[Hide] (85KB, 683x314) Reverse

2a52647bed23d96669377a5ee811252847361db754ce412af8c1d7989b7a8ccd.png
[Hide] (113.3KB, 571x561) Reverse

>>20284
It becomes less amusing, when you see it everywhere for years on end. He's a boomer living in Iran (proven, with videos), likely thinking IBs are usenets like the other anon said. The problem is that anons have told him to stop being a fag for years, how to use sage, how to post in the correct board, and so on-- he simply ignores it, before receiving bans, and continuing again after a period of time. Combined with all that, they're self-plug advertisements to likely his own bookstore.

He was banned here on /k/ and /fascist/, plus elsewhere, before returning again with zero change in behavior. I do wonder if he's a retarded boomer who hired out some pajeets to spam his stuff for years, as there's posts (again self-advertising) about his digital marketing strategy.

24d93a15b90c31ef8a41cf9568256e44ac6ea98ee8b27eb900f5e2e8fb7ef152.png
[Hide] (378.3KB, 512x680) Reverse

it belongs here

https://youtube.com/watch?v=92kZ_-2EfRc
Videos like this about the development of memes, on the internet, over time; overlaps with anthropology, I think.

>>20082
>>20083
>>20222
>>20223
I think you should kill yourself, Dwight.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=flWuvkNWuS4

USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST stop doubleposting faggot

>>20224
>Sign in
https://youtube.com/watch?v=WbkeQl6Rctk

USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST stop doubleposting faggot

>Marine Corps Boot Camp Is Stupid & Spiritually Depraved 
https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/watch?v=cjDHoNcH5o4
>The Marine Corps Is Stupid & Spiritually Depraved | PART 2 
https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/watch?v=K9gnRQaXH38

As someone who never even met a muhreen, it's interesting to listen to one detailing his experiences.

Is ukraine legally a country or not?

>>20233
Compared to an overseas territory or island nation, yes it is.

Nork.jpg
[Hide] (290.1KB, 1275x1905) Reverse

Hohols say that Kim-kun sent a bunch of heavy ballistic missiles and 8500 troops to help Poutine, and 400 out of those 8500 are drone operators. That the first year of ground combat was like cawadooty with the mish-mash of weapons & uniforms is one thing, but this is like when someone plays as a minor nation in Hearts of Iron 4, and sends a few units to help one of his allies controlled by the AI.

>>20267
>and 400 out of those 8500 are drone operators. 
Thats the real shit. Consider that Norks are now more suited to modern realities of warfare than most NATO members.

>>20270
And they seem to have nearly everything you'd want for a Ukraine style conflict, including lots of conventional artillery and troops you can sacrifice. The only thing missing is the drones themselves, but I'm sure the CCP would gladly send them more than enough to blot out the sky if they decided to unfreeze their war against the south. And that would be a pretty good distraction if they wanted to take Taiwan, not to mention that two simultaneous attacks would deny both CPU/GPU and RAM for the west. If I was in the business of running South Korea, there would be quite a few Ukrainian drone operators who look suspiciously East Asian by now.

>>20263
I don't think it's as fake as you say. What we are seeing is these various kikes fighting over who gets to be on top. They are very willing to murder and betray each other over that.

Anything which is not about the war is offtopic. Fuck off hasbara troons.

>>20263
>if Israel ceases to exist the muzzies wouldn´t have a "Empire of Satan" to rile up against and control their own population
Well, I move that yidsrael go ahead and be destroyed regardless. Then we can all see whether your little theory holds any water.

All in favor?

1787408359461124.jpg
[Hide] (767KB, 858x1395) Reverse

1787409202821561.jpg
[Hide] (369.1KB, 889x923) Reverse

>>20258
>yet I wanted to know if this quiet spell is due to Iran running out of targets or America deciding that economic warfare is the way forward now.
Neither, really. Iran has a metric shitton of available targets, and a fully-rejuvenated warfighting machine.

This is simply the jewSA admitting they lost the war, and slinking off back into the dark (without actually admitting to the loss, as is their wont). Simple as.

1787408202853683.jpg
[Hide] (584.2KB, 885x1364) Reverse

This appears to indicate the GCC is re-aligning around Iran as the regional security against the yid/jewSA forces?

>>18712
>no more was heard about "unrestricted submarine warfare."  It's almost like what is and isn't muh "war crimes" depends on whether you win.
I'm going to be lazy and just copy kikepedia, but the long story short is that Nimitz saved Dönitz by plainly admitting that the US was doing the same:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_D%C3%B6nitz#Nuremberg_war_crimes_trials
>His sentence on unrestricted submarine warfare was not assessed because of similar actions by the Allies. In particular, the British Admiralty, on 8 May 1940, had ordered all vessels in the Skagerrak sunk on sight, and Admiral Chester W. Nimitz, wartime commander-in-chief of the United States Pacific Fleet, stated the US Navy had waged unrestricted submarine warfare against Japan in the Pacific from the day the US officially entered the war. Thus, Dönitz was not charged with waging unrestricted submarine warfare against unarmed neutral shipping by ordering all ships in designated areas in international waters to be sunk without warning.
Most German generals could have just walked away from those trials if there were more people like Nimitz amongst the allies. Not to mention that if Nürnberg was really about meting out justice, the 

>>18716
Like every other aspect of US military and foreign policy between 1933 and around 1946, it was done to please Stalin, who loved him some show trials.  Never forget that this was just after half a million working-class White American men were enslaved by their own government and sent to their deaths to prop up Josef Stalin and install Mao T'se-Tung and Ho Chi Minh.

I don't know whether US entry into the war could have been prevented, realistically.  Japanese territorial ambitions in the Far East specifically and explicitly included the Philippines, then US territory.  Some will claim that the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was the direct and predictable result of eight consecutive years of calculated provocations, denunciations, and ultimatums from the Rosenfelt Administration.   There is truth in this.  FDR was desperate for a war and worked very hard to bring about conditions for US participation in the war that the whole world saw coming years before the fact, preferably on the side of ((( the Tribe ))).  But even if the US had not gotten a Red regime eager for a nice long expensive bloody war to get rid of working-class males who were surplus to requirements and give peasantry foreign enemies to talk about as a distraction from their own government's corruption and ineptitude, the Japanese plans for a Greater East Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere were real and went back to the 1

Are the UK carriers HMS PRINCE OF WALES and HMS QE any good?

>>19376
As with most hardware, the answer to that depends on how good a fit it is for what you're trying to accomplish. They're overbuilt for the STOVL carriers they ended up being, but they're also too small for sustained overseas operations like the Nimitz or Ford classes are for.
On the other hand, if you maintain a relatively small military and you only get one (well, two, but they're supposed to rotate in service with each other) they're probably the best compromise you can get. They're small enough for littoral work but big enough for bluewater, they can launch long range strike aircraft or ASW sorties, and carry 250 marines across the Atlantic with only a bit of DD/DDG support. If you're not going to run dedicated AAS hulls like the US marines or China, you're better off with the all-in-one solution even if it's not as capable as giant CATOBAR carrier and a group of support ships.

sailoranon_cabin.jpg
[Hide] (1MB, 3692x1465) Reverse

sailoranon_rack.jpg
[Hide] (587.3KB, 1600x1200) Reverse

Are there pictures enough to at least guess the navy and the type of the vessel? Those electric sockets on the right side of the cabin seem to be American to me, but I'm not even sure about that.

9304cd8c5c5718a38231f5a54089a6293b6ff37547f634a86339235a1b4bf439.mp4
[Hide] (14.8MB, 1080x1920, 00:25)

TestTEXT

WQGc6XEdig0lwTG2.mp4
[Hide] (9.3MB, 1920x1080, 00:34)

t2EaCRIqWLYsCU4w.mp4
[Hide] (3.9MB, 1080x1080, 00:12)

If you shot at 360 degrees no drones will hit you, artyon.

Self_Defense-2REG3-Wb5gM.mp4
[Hide] (6.2MB, 480x360, 02:39)

Remember the basics of CQC, Streloks.

002.webm
[Hide] (1.2MB, 460x258, 00:25)

ten characters and a webm
it's all i have

4_5990345248855825004.mp4
[Hide] (20MB, 464x848, 01:52)

>>11453
interesting theory

>>19660
Honestly it would be full clownworld if it was Hasidic jews that caused the collapse of Israel by refusing the draft violently.

>>19662
That's a clownworld I can get behind fully.

>>19659
That reminds me, what's that cartoon of a jew in underwear sending a soldier to die for him, it said something about Jerusalem too, i think? It really fits the situation we are now.

1784999157009101.jpg
[Hide] (178.5KB, 1290x1909) Reverse

Nice combo of attributes.

1784999319817911.png
[Hide] (42.7KB, 613x381) Reverse

>"The BIGGEST attack you've ever seen. Probably the Biggest Attack Ever!!
When will they ever learn?

be38936e711685de3d2f4d0a797dff4c.jpg
[Hide] (14.1KB, 250x254) Reverse

My russian teacher said that when speaking in the future tense I don't have to use возможно or может быть,  Мне кажется or other words that mean it seems to me or express uncertainty. I only need to use words those words when you want to highlight uncertainty. If it's cloudy I can say just будет идёт дождь even if it's not a hundred percent clear it will.  Can someone explain this line of thinking? It feels a little complicated to wrap my brain around

>>19401
Sorry, I can only offer Hungarian lessons.

>>19402
Is it worth learning hungarian?  How do Hungarians view foreign learners? I think Poles are the French of the Eastern European world, they'll ask why the fuck are learning the language whereas slavs and holols will be excited when you talk to them in the language even when it's not greatest

>>19419
>Is it worth learning hungarian?  
The worth of learning a language depends entirely on the person who learns it. For example, if you want to spend the rest of your lives in a small Amazonian tribe, then learning the language is a very worthwhile endeavour, otherwise it's unlikely that you get anything out of it. In the same vein, if you want or need to speak or read Hungarian then you should definitely learn it, otherwise it's not like there's a point of it. 
>How do Hungarians view foreign learners?
Most people find them cute, but you shouldn't try to use it in an official or semi-official setting you are not a fluent reader, because you'll just make life harder for everyone. So ordering at a restaurant in broken Hungarian is fine, but you shouldn't try to turn a visit to a bank into a language lesson.

>>19401
>I can say just будет идёт дождь
I'll assume you meant пойдёт дождь.
When one makes statements about the future (in most languages, I think) some level of uncertainty is implied. Then consider the tone and emphasis, not just the grammar/linguistics.
пойдёт дождь. - focus is mainly on the noun (дождь) with the verb (пойдёт) helping to direct things into the future tense.
пойдёт дождь. - is an assertion.
дождь пойдёт! - a strong assertion.
пойдёт дождь or пойдёт снег - when either snow or rain are plausible.

>"the era of one-sided deals is OVER. We told you: keep your word or pay the price. Reality is knocking."
>from the Persian negotiator
Fun really is really back on the menu. How long until gas skyrockets again?

>>19057
>'«Lindsey Graham died in Kiev, not Washington, DC.»'
LMAO, I wanna habeeb.
https://news-pravda.com/world/2026/07/12/2436936.html

>>19086
>He was visiting a drone factory in Kiev that was hit by the Russians. He did not have enough time to depart Ukraine on Saturday morning, take the train to Poland and then catch a flight back to DC.
>Senior folks at the Pentagon are talking about Senator Graham dying during an inspection of a drone factory in Kiev.
That is a remarkable argument.i too, "wanna baheeb".

>>19087
SUDDEN ILLNESS

>>19088
I will be completely honest. The worst of "neoconservative" politicians getting got in one of the wars they promoted pleases me. Shame it wasn't for this kike war.