/k/ - Weapons and Militaria

none viable.

1785590018598961.jpg
[Hide] (129.2KB, 826x506) Reverse

What did the jewSA mean by this?

>>19870
These missiles already have AI guidance systems.

>>19873
That the planned major bombing campaign is going to hurt the kikes when the Persians retaliate. Especially if they target civilian infrastructure.

1785614586898427.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 824x1428) Reverse

What did Elvis mean by this?

633903724f512b9a1facfaf344539771f831a8b2b95951d3305a53085989b8a5.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 1280x853) Reverse

I wonder if he said "thank you" this time around.

>>19783
>never talk to me or my son again

>>19784
At least atual sons come close or surpass their fathers. See Barron. Also Trump is short, and not 6'3" as listed. He is too much of a narcissist to admit like all old faggots, he lost a few inches, along with his hair.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQD9kSsiDdA&t=45s
Russians deployed anti-drone APS in Ukraine and it seems to be working.

>>19810
>At least atual sons come close or surpass their fathers
:(

>>19538
Meant travel up. The bullet, I mean. I fucked up my post, but it's still good to know. 

Polite sage for being retarded enough to doublepost, but still not retarded enough toput my finger on the trigger if I'm not planning on shooting something.

They_see_me_rollin',_they_be_hatin.jpg
[Hide] (143.9KB, 1200x749) Reverse

>chyna_stylin

Cassoon_Box_design_used_in_the_Delware_River.gif
[Hide] (9.6KB, 300x173) Reverse

A few years ago we had an impromptu conversation about this one painting where a bishop or cardinal is watching a big naval battle from the docks, with really prominent cheval de frise along the water line. But I cannot remember the name of the painting to save my life. Does anyone know the one I'm talking about?

Siege_of_La_Rochelle_1881_Henri_Motte.png
[Hide] (7.5MB, 3000x1705) Reverse

>>19724
Sounds like Siege of La Rochelle.

>>19726
That's the one. Thanks a bunch strelok.

WQGc6XEdig0lwTG2.mp4
[Hide] (9.3MB, 1920x1080, 00:34)

t2EaCRIqWLYsCU4w.mp4
[Hide] (3.9MB, 1080x1080, 00:12)

If you shot at 360 degrees no drones will hit you, artyon.

Self_Defense-2REG3-Wb5gM.mp4
[Hide] (6.2MB, 480x360, 02:39)

Remember the basics of CQC, Streloks.

bikini.gif
[Hide] (3MB, 480x357) Reverse

>Babes in Bikinis Firing Automatic Weapons
If ever there was a sentence that inspired me to break into making VaporWave, this is it.

https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/watch?v=OlL2QIKSIZE
(too big to post here)

002.webm
[Hide] (1.2MB, 460x258, 00:25)

ten characters and a webm
it's all i have

4_5990345248855825004.mp4
[Hide] (20MB, 464x848, 01:52)

>>11453
interesting theory

>>19660
Honestly it would be full clownworld if it was Hasidic jews that caused the collapse of Israel by refusing the draft violently.

>>19662
That's a clownworld I can get behind fully.

>>19659
That reminds me, what's that cartoon of a jew in underwear sending a soldier to die for him, it said something about Jerusalem too, i think? It really fits the situation we are now.

1784999157009101.jpg
[Hide] (178.5KB, 1290x1909) Reverse

Nice combo of attributes.

1784999319817911.png
[Hide] (42.7KB, 613x381) Reverse

>"The BIGGEST attack you've ever seen. Probably the Biggest Attack Ever!!
When will they ever learn?

d58e15d4b60d6c5bc77fc20337c961d660ad385a7eeb2684cba17db06d96cb17.gif
[Hide] (116.8KB, 220x220) Reverse

I'm not sure else where to put this.

I received a word-filter ban on here for about two weeks on every board for saying Trump is a PDFile (word I got banned for was the first four from the full word of this) in connection to his activities with Epstein and Maxwell, as a response to a different anon who asked why the U.S. government were doing such insane actions such as invading Iran, merging the militaries of the U.S. and Israel, and a possible draft scare.

This doesn't strike me as anything remotely off-topic or that shocking to say, given such files being out for a decade plus now. Is this normal to receive a ban from ALL boards, making me unable to post on /v/ for example, for TWO weeks, for something this innocuous? I understand it's probably related to the CP spammers, but do I really need to use Twitter / Reddit tier language-policing now to avoid this in the future?

>>19640
I lifted it. Didn't even see your post, but checked the active bans a moment ago. It says you got hit by a filter for posting the phrase "s*x with children".

>>19642
Oh, right, I did say he's a p*dophile with the Israelis having tapes of him doing that with children as blackmail. Thank you for fixing it.

>>19643
To be clear, the filter isn't lifted. I have no power over removing the filter itself. It's in place because CP spammers used to be that brazen and post that phrase and others like it.

>>19645
I'll keep that in mind. Seen that group spam all the different altchans for years, and all too familiar with them unfortunately.

>>19507 (OP) 
Which German military though? WWII era? WWI? Post war developments? Modern? pre-1900s?

be38936e711685de3d2f4d0a797dff4c.jpg
[Hide] (14.1KB, 250x254) Reverse

My russian teacher said that when speaking in the future tense I don't have to use возможно or может быть,  Мне кажется or other words that mean it seems to me or express uncertainty. I only need to use words those words when you want to highlight uncertainty. If it's cloudy I can say just будет идёт дождь even if it's not a hundred percent clear it will.  Can someone explain this line of thinking? It feels a little complicated to wrap my brain around

>>19401
Sorry, I can only offer Hungarian lessons.

>>19402
Is it worth learning hungarian?  How do Hungarians view foreign learners? I think Poles are the French of the Eastern European world, they'll ask why the fuck are learning the language whereas slavs and holols will be excited when you talk to them in the language even when it's not greatest

>>19419
>Is it worth learning hungarian?  
The worth of learning a language depends entirely on the person who learns it. For example, if you want to spend the rest of your lives in a small Amazonian tribe, then learning the language is a very worthwhile endeavour, otherwise it's unlikely that you get anything out of it. In the same vein, if you want or need to speak or read Hungarian then you should definitely learn it, otherwise it's not like there's a point of it. 
>How do Hungarians view foreign learners?
Most people find them cute, but you shouldn't try to use it in an official or semi-official setting you are not a fluent reader, because you'll just make life harder for everyone. So ordering at a restaurant in broken Hungarian is fine, but you shouldn't try to turn a visit to a bank into a language lesson.

>>19401
>I can say just будет идёт дождь
I'll assume you meant пойдёт дождь.
When one makes statements about the future (in most languages, I think) some level of uncertainty is implied. Then consider the tone and emphasis, not just the grammar/linguistics.
пойдёт дождь. - focus is mainly on the noun (дождь) with the verb (пойдёт) helping to direct things into the future tense.
пойдёт дождь. - is an assertion.
дождь пойдёт! - a strong assertion.
пойдёт дождь or пойдёт снег - when either snow or rain are plausible.

>>18360
Of course.  What British propaganda of the time called "unrestricted submarine warfare" was everybody's SOP just two decades later.  By 1942 US submarines were surfacing to fire their deck guns at sampans off China because they might be carrying supplies for the Japanese, and no more was heard about "unrestricted submarine warfare."  It's almost like what is and isn't muh "war crimes" depends on whether you win.

>>18712
>no more was heard about "unrestricted submarine warfare."  It's almost like what is and isn't muh "war crimes" depends on whether you win.
I'm going to be lazy and just copy kikepedia, but the long story short is that Nimitz saved Dönitz by plainly admitting that the US was doing the same:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_D%C3%B6nitz#Nuremberg_war_crimes_trials
>His sentence on unrestricted submarine warfare was not assessed because of similar actions by the Allies. In particular, the British Admiralty, on 8 May 1940, had ordered all vessels in the Skagerrak sunk on sight, and Admiral Chester W. Nimitz, wartime commander-in-chief of the United States Pacific Fleet, stated the US Navy had waged unrestricted submarine warfare against Japan in the Pacific from the day the US officially entered the war. Thus, Dönitz was not charged with waging unrestricted submarine warfare against unarmed neutral shipping by ordering all ships in designated areas in international waters to be sunk without warning.
Most German generals could have just walked away from those trials if there were more people like Nimitz amongst the allies. Not to mention that if Nürnberg was really about meting out justice, the 

>>18716
Like every other aspect of US military and foreign policy between 1933 and around 1946, it was done to please Stalin, who loved him some show trials.  Never forget that this was just after half a million working-class White American men were enslaved by their own government and sent to their deaths to prop up Josef Stalin and install Mao T'se-Tung and Ho Chi Minh.

I don't know whether US entry into the war could have been prevented, realistically.  Japanese territorial ambitions in the Far East specifically and explicitly included the Philippines, then US territory.  Some will claim that the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was the direct and predictable result of eight consecutive years of calculated provocations, denunciations, and ultimatums from the Rosenfelt Administration.   There is truth in this.  FDR was desperate for a war and worked very hard to bring about conditions for US participation in the war that the whole world saw coming years before the fact, preferably on the side of ((( the Tribe ))).  But even if the US had not gotten a Red regime eager for a nice long expensive bloody war to get rid of working-class males who were surplus to requirements and give peasantry foreign enemies to talk about as a distraction from their own government's corruption and ineptitude, the Japanese plans for a Greater East Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere were real and went back to the 1

Are the UK carriers HMS PRINCE OF WALES and HMS QE any good?

>>19376
As with most hardware, the answer to that depends on how good a fit it is for what you're trying to accomplish. They're overbuilt for the STOVL carriers they ended up being, but they're also too small for sustained overseas operations like the Nimitz or Ford classes are for.
On the other hand, if you maintain a relatively small military and you only get one (well, two, but they're supposed to rotate in service with each other) they're probably the best compromise you can get. They're small enough for littoral work but big enough for bluewater, they can launch long range strike aircraft or ASW sorties, and carry 250 marines across the Atlantic with only a bit of DD/DDG support. If you're not going to run dedicated AAS hulls like the US marines or China, you're better off with the all-in-one solution even if it's not as capable as giant CATOBAR carrier and a group of support ships.