/k/ - Weapons and Militaria

e37d5d98146eb76e9efdd2c044aa80435dedc188924843fac5979272436c1055.mp4
[Hide] (5MB, 480x852, 01:16)

Mucho TEXTO

aa195b5527469913539e144131cf3ed9295835f3ce31dc7d9822f944b04dccaa.mp4
[Hide] (5MB, 848x848, 00:45)

88c02dce8e2cf014c96238513b61bd70a99ef72ae5b945ac7d5f93c0232dea26.mp4
[Hide] (1.2MB, 1280x720, 00:05)

8925f344aa2bdf55ad8857e83d32b339fbfc3ac10310ac290e2df885aad4a457.mp4
[Hide] (4.2MB, 848x464, 00:56)

Message?

0fa17db6361d30e4f3f1e7f0c458ca110c1db0e551f1ab631d944ea566cebe41.mp4
[Hide] (27.2MB, 1080x1920, 00:33)

>hop in anon we are going to the front!

>>19597

Sirskiy wasn't fucking anything up. You people just live in delusions that Ukraine is somehow technologically so much better than Russia that they can overcome the laws of physics. 

Budanov told you plainly, 30 thousand people per month, doesn't matter who's in charge.

457b2cceb8cca2199d6b441e8f366fbc0fc2ac4302dfbdb2b13a00d3fc9cfc36.jpg
[Hide] (120KB, 752x1280) Reverse

texto texto?

>>20462
Not here. This is the ME thread, try the Russia thread two doors down.

>>20461
>>20466
strikes me its a combo of all three things.

>>20450
>Trump casually announcing another 1.4 trillion in debt in an effort to buy votes
Nigger is desperate.

>>20406
at 5:50 is that another technical with a literal cannon mounted on the back? I remember one of those being a meme back in the Syrian civil war.

>>20469
>another 1.4 trillion in debt 
<just casually puts that out there
Trust the plan. Let the goyim deal in the real world.

>>20355
>video conferencing with AI avatars
This is already being normalized as well. There are so e states where basically all criminal arrangements are held via teleconference. The accused basically never leave lockup, directly interact with their lawyer or DA, have to stand in a LINE of other detainees (Yeah, this might be the most important conversation of your life, but hurry the fuck up!) and to nobody's surprise, if corrections considers the accused problematic the connection can "just go down" for the day. It's fucking nuts, and a AI chatjudge™ would just make too much sense to add to the fucking nutsitude.

>>20399
The ((( justice ))) system is mostly theater either way, with a good lawyer those problems you describe go away and for those who have to rely on public defenders the odds aren't great, teleconferencing or not.

>>20404
Too true. I just think it's worth mentioning, considering. 

It's also incredibly depressing to bring up deliberate failures in Western justice around WN/NDSP anons and the first thing out of their mouth is, "DID IT HAPPEN TO A NIGGER? IF IT HAPPENS TO A NIGGER OH FUCKING WELL NOT MY PROBLEM." Yeah, it's called a 'Test Run,' buddy. Fucking hell.

8O9Uj0KGujbcDCKFs.jpeg
[Hide] (170.9KB, 818x1255) Reverse

8O9UcKUCMiNnKKD9s.jpeg
[Hide] (348.3KB, 1260x815) Reverse

8O9UhAEZbb8HD9KKs.jpeg
[Hide] (206.7KB, 815x1260) Reverse

I'm not sure if dup should be banned from playing with AI or if he should do this all day instead of whatever the fuck he does normally.

>>20463
It is just a pajeet doing PR stuff.
>mexico being burger state
Hey, at least they are here LEGALLY.

>>19401
>I can say just будет идёт дождь
I'll assume you meant пойдёт дождь.
When one makes statements about the future (in most languages, I think) some level of uncertainty is implied. Then consider the tone and emphasis, not just the grammar/linguistics.
пойдёт дождь. - focus is mainly on the noun (дождь) with the verb (пойдёт) helping to direct things into the future tense.
пойдёт дождь. - is an assertion.
дождь пойдёт! - a strong assertion.
пойдёт дождь or пойдёт снег - when either snow or rain are plausible.

ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (748.7KB, 1200x305) Reverse

ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (5.6MB, 2048x1536) Reverse

ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (8.3MB, 1776x3516) Reverse

My 'tism kicked in: you know how Kriss Vector's claim to fame is that the bolt travels down in order to reduce felt recoil? Well, you could take a rifle with an inline stock (such as the AR-15), bend the barrel downward a bit, and if you also change the placement of the sights, then the shooter will have to  hold at an angle (compared to the ground) in order to shoot forward. Imagine trying to shoot with the gun on the second pic forward with the Krummlauf attached, you'd have to hold it in a rather funky way. Of course, the barrel shouldn't be so extremely bent, but you get the idea. And yes, it's a retarded idea, but such a barrel could be a fun novelty product.

>>20444
>the gun on the second pic forward with the Krummlauf attached
I mean the third pic, for the second pic the device would have to be rotated 90 degrees. Also, it might work better if instead of an external device the barrel itself would be bent, but really only very slightly, like 5-10 degrees.

mas38-01.jpg
[Hide] (466.5KB, 2378x941) Reverse

MAS38cutaway.jpg
[Hide] (135.3KB, 800x600) Reverse

>>20444
>>20445
And I should also mention the MAS-38, as bending the barrel would be an alternative to making the whole receiver slanted.

>>20444
>image #3
Well I guess we now know the secret of that anon's exploding office chair.

What happened with the new Iran thread?
>>20281
>either a schzio spammer, or he's an agentic AI bot.
I think he's simply a boomer who thinks imageboards work like usenet.

>>20281
no he's real, he's a forum user, he's just a retard

>>20281
>>20282
That's a bit harsh, I didn't mind his boomerific posts i actually liked them. Can't comment on flooding because I didn't see it.

879f2fb4104f16d2fdc5b9278f419e786fe1341f28b03804f848481503931242.gif
[Hide] (5.4MB, 498x373) Reverse

>>20281
>I've been working

1545a0bdd584bd4697eef50f3d13debfbccb6068e65761f515271d54c5c48f46.png
[Hide] (174.6KB, 1421x622) Reverse

a2cb1da822b88fcb1d16d9fdfbeb2081b2775293482fd696324a72912ab376ba.png
[Hide] (116.3KB, 524x863) Reverse

7a873baf13b1534cdc85fad850b260b7664167e34f7253f7f2078ebe27d6ff26.png
[Hide] (85KB, 683x314) Reverse

2a52647bed23d96669377a5ee811252847361db754ce412af8c1d7989b7a8ccd.png
[Hide] (113.3KB, 571x561) Reverse

>>20284
It becomes less amusing, when you see it everywhere for years on end. He's a boomer living in Iran (proven, with videos), likely thinking IBs are usenets like the other anon said. The problem is that anons have told him to stop being a fag for years, how to use sage, how to post in the correct board, and so on-- he simply ignores it, before receiving bans, and continuing again after a period of time. Combined with all that, they're self-plug advertisements to likely his own bookstore.

He was banned here on /k/ and /fascist/, plus elsewhere, before returning again with zero change in behavior. I do wonder if he's a retarded boomer who hired out some pajeets to spam his stuff for years, as there's posts (again self-advertising) about his digital marketing strategy.

>>20288
I pointed out before that USrael would do everything in their power to prevent that. It likely is hurting right now but they are desperately attempting to gain control over the home front, using surveillance, for a draft to invade Iran.

Anyone else think that the Trump administration calling the new round of sanctions "Economic D Day" is really lame? By expressly invoking D Day they have unwittingly stated that the US is no longer able (for what ever reason) to pull off the massive sort of ground invasion that they did nearly 80 years ago and so are opting for a sort of metaphorical D Day instead. 

It's also really quite risky. They're forcing everyone to declare their hand. I guess they're just hoping that it will force all the other countries to side with the US and the US dollar instead of against it. But if they're wrong and it starts a sort of "run on the bank" so to speak it'll be an economic bloodbath.

>>20288
>Weekly U.S. Ending Stocks of Crude Oil in SPR
The 80s are so back and on track for the 70s B-)
Is this the grand idea for restoring traditional values in America?

>>20289
As if. A draft at this point in time, regardless of who calls it and how many federal agents are sent to enforce it, would result in an immediate shattering of the union and a (major) net reduction in federal military power. Nothing short of an organized, uniformed land invasion of the continental US would generate sufficient public support for a draft that wouldn't cause a civil war at this point.
Bad news for the rest of NATO, sure, since that means all the US could do in an article 5 scenario is drop a bunch of bombs and threaten nuclear war, but that's the truth of the political situation in the not-so-United States right now.

>>20456
I don't know what they expected really. You would think you wouldn't want to disenfranchise the people you want to go send to die in a massive boondoggle war to the point where if you hand them a gun they are going to turn around and shoot you but hey I'm not a politician what do I know.

>>18712
>no more was heard about "unrestricted submarine warfare."  It's almost like what is and isn't muh "war crimes" depends on whether you win.
I'm going to be lazy and just copy kikepedia, but the long story short is that Nimitz saved Dönitz by plainly admitting that the US was doing the same:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_D%C3%B6nitz#Nuremberg_war_crimes_trials
>His sentence on unrestricted submarine warfare was not assessed because of similar actions by the Allies. In particular, the British Admiralty, on 8 May 1940, had ordered all vessels in the Skagerrak sunk on sight, and Admiral Chester W. Nimitz, wartime commander-in-chief of the United States Pacific Fleet, stated the US Navy had waged unrestricted submarine warfare against Japan in the Pacific from the day the US officially entered the war. Thus, Dönitz was not charged with waging unrestricted submarine warfare against unarmed neutral shipping by ordering all ships in designated areas in international waters to be sunk without warning.
Most German generals could have just walked away from those trials if there were more people like Nimitz amongst the allies. Not to mention that if Nürnberg was really about meting out justice, the 

>>18716
Like every other aspect of US military and foreign policy between 1933 and around 1946, it was done to please Stalin, who loved him some show trials.  Never forget that this was just after half a million working-class White American men were enslaved by their own government and sent to their deaths to prop up Josef Stalin and install Mao T'se-Tung and Ho Chi Minh.

I don't know whether US entry into the war could have been prevented, realistically.  Japanese territorial ambitions in the Far East specifically and explicitly included the Philippines, then US territory.  Some will claim that the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was the direct and predictable result of eight consecutive years of calculated provocations, denunciations, and ultimatums from the Rosenfelt Administration.   There is truth in this.  FDR was desperate for a war and worked very hard to bring about conditions for US participation in the war that the whole world saw coming years before the fact, preferably on the side of ((( the Tribe ))).  But even if the US had not gotten a Red regime eager for a nice long expensive bloody war to get rid of working-class males who were surplus to requirements and give peasantry foreign enemies to talk about as a distraction from their own government's corruption and ineptitude, the Japanese plans for a Greater East Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere were real and went back to the 1

Are the UK carriers HMS PRINCE OF WALES and HMS QE any good?

>>19376
As with most hardware, the answer to that depends on how good a fit it is for what you're trying to accomplish. They're overbuilt for the STOVL carriers they ended up being, but they're also too small for sustained overseas operations like the Nimitz or Ford classes are for.
On the other hand, if you maintain a relatively small military and you only get one (well, two, but they're supposed to rotate in service with each other) they're probably the best compromise you can get. They're small enough for littoral work but big enough for bluewater, they can launch long range strike aircraft or ASW sorties, and carry 250 marines across the Atlantic with only a bit of DD/DDG support. If you're not going to run dedicated AAS hulls like the US marines or China, you're better off with the all-in-one solution even if it's not as capable as giant CATOBAR carrier and a group of support ships.

sailoranon_cabin.jpg
[Hide] (1MB, 3692x1465) Reverse

sailoranon_rack.jpg
[Hide] (587.3KB, 1600x1200) Reverse

Are there pictures enough to at least guess the navy and the type of the vessel? Those electric sockets on the right side of the cabin seem to be American to me, but I'm not even sure about that.

9304cd8c5c5718a38231f5a54089a6293b6ff37547f634a86339235a1b4bf439.mp4
[Hide] (14.8MB, 1080x1920, 00:25)

TestTEXT

WQGc6XEdig0lwTG2.mp4
[Hide] (9.3MB, 1920x1080, 00:34)

t2EaCRIqWLYsCU4w.mp4
[Hide] (3.9MB, 1080x1080, 00:12)

If you shot at 360 degrees no drones will hit you, artyon.

Self_Defense-2REG3-Wb5gM.mp4
[Hide] (6.2MB, 480x360, 02:39)

Remember the basics of CQC, Streloks.

002.webm
[Hide] (1.2MB, 460x258, 00:25)

ten characters and a webm
it's all i have

4_5990345248855825004.mp4
[Hide] (20MB, 464x848, 01:52)

>>11453
interesting theory

>>19660
Honestly it would be full clownworld if it was Hasidic jews that caused the collapse of Israel by refusing the draft violently.

>>19662
That's a clownworld I can get behind fully.

>>19659
That reminds me, what's that cartoon of a jew in underwear sending a soldier to die for him, it said something about Jerusalem too, i think? It really fits the situation we are now.

1784999157009101.jpg
[Hide] (178.5KB, 1290x1909) Reverse

Nice combo of attributes.

1784999319817911.png
[Hide] (42.7KB, 613x381) Reverse

>"The BIGGEST attack you've ever seen. Probably the Biggest Attack Ever!!
When will they ever learn?