/liberty/ - Austro-Libertarianism

contract.jpg
[Hide] (63.2KB, 640x280)

>>149
>the webmaster should be allowed to dictate how you can access the site

>>1168
>the webmaster should be allowed to dictate how you can access the site
If you are so weak you get addicted to stupid shit like youtube then that is your problem, not mine and certainly not the government's.

>>13
Why do the biggest assholes use this phrase?

>>1206
Accidentally highlighted over my copypasta. This phrase:
>just really curious

Make sure to buy Monero to help against 51% attack pls thx

>>1556
>trigger word detected
Sorry but you've activated me: 

I doubt Venezuela was needing to be changed. Trump was probably just jealous that he can't' be a president for 25 years like Maduro and felt like being petty. *shrugs* I also like to imagine the USA in general dick waving at Russia saying "see this is what we could do to you! I'm comin' for ya Putin!" in some immature bullshit way. Feel my powah as they attack the wrong nation. We do commerce with Venezuela but like an abusive drunk Uncle would you've got Sammy-boy punching it's friend in the eye because he can't beat up his daddy Russia wherein the Caucasis Mountians actually reside, where whites actually come from in christian mythology. Jealousy again, that Russia is whiter by far than the USA and also closer to holy lands in general. I wish they'd cock back and nuke us to shut us the fuck up. Actions speak louder than words and all so why not just nuke something small like Jew York? Nobody would miss it anyway.  With think tanks being forced at gunpoint to give Sammy-boy advice I'm sure it's on their todo list to let Russia nuke NYNY as they're trying to let the Arabs invade it, what with how jews hate Muslims once it's Muslim then they'll let it be nuked. Then they'll say some jewish bullhsit about how they turned from god and we'll go to war with Russia plus the middle east, but only after they replace the Jew York with sand niggers to please the jewish need for war mongering with the Arabs. How many thousands of years did they use black oil, the middle east? It's like a fetish with these people and they 100 percent have Musk micro-managing things to make sure we never get electric cars again as that'd take away the fetishism. Why else would he be so rich? It's a literal ((( holy oil ))) to them, these faggots. They go on about how long their precious lamp lasted in their bibles. I could shit a better narrative than this. 
>drugs are bad you don't get it
All drugs should be legalized lest you like enabling cartels to sell it anyway. 

Shoutout to Koreans for being retarded and not killing Trump when he visited years ago. We cut their nation in half, supplied the S Koreans with guns and shit to oppose them, etc, we are the enemy. Fatass gook was afraid of dying and nothing more and trump is being a faggot because he's got one leg in the grave. Same with putin, they're old and so they attack their little nations like bullies, slavs attacking slavs, US attacking it's little oil buddies. It's funny that people are so stuipd that they act like Biden can be a simple scapegoat so we can pretend 'oh the usa didn't do it it was him HE DID IT' when that will lead to a demand for the US to get rid of it's presidency as a function forever so as to remove the excuse. If the world had real justice at the very least our war mongering presidents would be the ones in handcuffs. 
>bushes
>clinton 
>biden
>now trump 
Eisenhower  was a sissy bitch also. He'd have enjoyed prison rape so I'm leaving him out. Reminder that Lincoln was a tyrant also. Fuck the US's entire history for the fact that they made a liqour tax going back to Washington. May everyone that even lived in the USA ever even once for any reason at all (except it's natives such as the Mexicans and the Indjins) burn in hell forever. Guilt by association. If I were your jesus I'd spit you out. Like a nigger claiming it's one of the good ones, you can miss me with that gay shit. 
<but there is a single man left in sodom and gomorrah, BELIEVE!

I've been interested recently in how much of our product enshittification is caused by government regulations. It occurs to me that an interesting book idea would be of the format:
Product - What's shitty about it nowadays - Which regulation(s) has/have caused the enshittification - How to DIY it.
Examples:
Washing Machine - They're $2k brand new and sometimes require subscriptions, insane electronics, and a wifi connection - Water conservation standards - Bucket design/plunger design--there's a lot of DIY designs out there that are super cheap.
Cars - Spyware infested, remote shut down, "onboard entertainment" bloat, subscriptions, etc. - CAFE and safety regulations - car kits.
Etc.

BTs1I2Y4OK5i.png
[Hide] (114.9KB, 514x250)

It is as if the E.U. and the U.K. are handing their publishing industry over to the U.S. on a sliver platter at this point.

frenchman.jpg
[Hide] (44.4KB, 574x745)

Are there any libertarian spaces online that aren't fedded to hell, where one can discusses the finer points of liberty? there genuinely seems to be no good forums, discord servers, or imageboards of people who still believe in libertarianism, that arent atleast completely dead like this place.

On that same note, i think we should aggressively shill this board to online political spaces.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T4Upf_B9RLQ
I bet you they're going to blame everything on monopolies, and not the regulations incentivizing massive centralization and enshittification.
https://storage02.forbrukerradet.no/media/2026/02/breaking-free-pathways-to-a-fair-technological-future.pdf
I fucking called it.
Nothing about the digital dots and registration requirement laws for printers that make them shitty.
Nothing about the water conservation laws that make washing machines and dishwashers have bullshit control boards and wifi to work.
Nothing about the new safety regs on cars (c.f. the automatic driving regs in the states) that make it so every car HAS to have an enormous amount of software on them. Or how they all HAVE to have remote stop capabilities.
Nothing about all the data privacy laws that require ridiculous customer data retention.
Nothing about the mere talk of age verification laws that have recently made every online site even shittier and REQUIRE logins.
ZERO TALK about that.
It's ALWAYS ONLY capitalism's fault.
They NEVER see the government's hand in this. They can't even know that this POV exists!

>>1575 (OP) 
>where do you get your mind control from?
If it were really statisical historical information then search engines would let you search news articles via year dates. It's just 'this just in, the powers that be are forcing you to think this or that. As their interests change we will let you know what your peasant ass is to think later on, but most likely it will be "be afraid goyim and it's your fault you're afraid and your being afraid is a good thing"'. Geekologie.com (RIP) counted as a news source for me back when I had faith that things were going to be interesting, of which they are NOT. As it were even geekologie had lots of literally fake articles though it was funny even when fake. You're suppoed to not be gullible anyway and the original GW  was very funny. The probably fired him, the cunt that shut the site down, the admin, as he had no sense of humor and or no common sense, or at least the userbase had that issue and bitched. Fool(s). 

I look up historical stuff, not the news, and as things are never really changing for the better and everything is just momentum from yesteryear the news shall never be of value. You can predict it all from knowing the history rather than be misled by some current narrative meant to either placate or scare the goyim, and what is sick is that they try to do both at the same time. To ask to know the news is 

>>1581
Well I guess you're right. But now, the recursive question: what about history? Because if I were to study history, there would be several different viewpoints to study it. For instance, those who say Stalin was good and those who say he was bad. Should I read both sides and then make my own idea? Is it really different from reading leftist rightist newspapers?

Firefly_Terradrome_333149.mp4
[Hide] (7.1MB, 720x1280, 00:08)

[iCKoniCiconic_by_David_icke]_David_Walliams_-_Road_map_by_David_icke_2025_(2026)_-_libgen.li.pdf
(8MB)

It’s all unknown known. Look within.

https://rumble.com/v35waq4-rt-news-livestream-247.html

It depends on the subject, for example I read cannabis and other drug-related news from marijuanamoment, gambling regulations news from iGB, et cetera.

Otherwise I just check Wikipedia's current events portal for relevant happenings worldwide.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Current_events

lindell_SS.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 1114x1102)

sure he does...

>>1013
Yeah he doesn't

>>1013
I saw someone post this elsewhere like a week or two ago and thought it was a joke. Checked his website and had a good, long laugh. Hilarious to see WN dogwhistles in marketing.

>>1011 (OP) 
This didn't age well.

>JD Vance
literally who
>cellphone screenshot (of twitter?)
>bumping the news from 2024
homosexuality

51bfef3ed2cf71e255475239b58a2ca4ab84dd83f9f9e66d917f787b6c5a5667.png
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1080x2460)

598e98e26afd6a54be0b301bdb6ad20938d76a0c40f70cff99f28ad8c1c61f02.png
[Hide] (1.4MB, 1080x2460)

How

>>1496
>>1495
Lighting
ya retard

>>1497
Yet none of the white cops turn black dumbfuck

OMG HE GOT SHOT WHILE DEFENDING THE 2ND AMENDMENT.

>>1487 (OP) 
He's a Martin Luther King figure.
They made him to be a sacrifice. The problem is he started to go outside his programming and question certain "truths" so they may have pushed forward his martyrdom.

>Electing a politician will never give you freedom
...but like...isn't it pretty clear in Milei's case that Argentina is WAY more free and prosperous than what was happening before? Isn't there some qote from Rothbard talking about how if you have two bills you have to choose between, you choose the one that gives more liberty?

>>1455
As long as the state exists there can be no freedom.

>>1464
O....k.....? Are we talking about the same thing anymore? Why is your response a response to what I said?

>>1448 (OP) 
id be inclined to agree, thats why im influenced by vanguardists

>>1448 (OP) 
2 words: neurotechnology.

>>1567
>>1420

>>1568
Upgrade your IQ to understand the point of my post and also to learn to sage. Hookers are allowed in libertarian scenarios and in such anarchist scenarios women are only allowed to be either some man's property or a hooker generally, or both rather. It's the 'oldest profession' as they say. Women today hate hookers as today we hate freedom and love to trade freedom for safety. Hookers die of stds and bastards being born is problematic, so is drowning infants as she will evolve to become more sociopathic. When women want to be more than somebody's  property then you've got too many rules catering to her needs. 
>the rights of women, such as to vote
Voting is retarded. Any enlightened libertarian would know this. You don't have any rights except to be  killed  because I felt like it. If you were nicer you'd still be alive. That's the nature of libertarianism. The hooker is beaten to death if she sucks at sucking dick, the cowboy is shot for being too drunk, and you get told to stop being a nigger for linking my post just because I didn't spell it out for you that women are not supposed to have rights and thta to be libertarian their natural habitat is literally to be freedly sucking on cocks. Egotistical feminist leaders tell women it's bad but nobody is born that way. They don't want your 'rights'. Rights don't exist. People that like rules and hate freedom cater to 'rig

>>1569
Thank you for actually explaining yourself. Some constructive criticism: your previous posts were not the height of brevity, because I was wondering if a schizo or a GPT bot was on the board. It kind of shows how little you've been socialized. I don't say that as an insult, by the way, I say it out of pity. You remind me of a guy I knew who got fired because he kept doing things that appeared random to everyone else. If you talked to him and asked him to explain himself, his logic made SOME sense, but each step was such a wild leap, and each phrase he uttered was so out of the normal lexicon, that his boss thought he was honestly mentally ill. In a way he was. The truth was that he talked with people so little that he had no idea what was common sense. He had no idea what were the common words you use. He had no idea what the other person's thought processes were to show where he had to speak more to justify a point or less.
Sage went in the name field because I just fat fingered it, but the fact that you felt so bereaved you had to point it out twice makes it apparent to me that I'm guessing you're crying out because nobody listens to you. My guess is that you're caught in a vicious cycle where you remain poorly socialized because you are poorly socialized. Don't worry, some day you'll figure it out.

>>1570
I feel like I need to break down why I thought you were legitimately schizophrenic. The standard signs are certain markers of disorganized thought. Namely, your response exhibited: tangenitality, loose associations, and inappropriate affect. 
>>1564
Was a broad question about women's rights and libertarianism.
>>1567
You replied by immediately talking specifically about hookers. This is very loosely thematically linked (because it still at least relates to women), but makes no explicit mention to rights, thereby expressing 'tangentiality.'
You went on to "Open legs and get paid" followed immediately by "drown baby in the river later." Those thoughts are connected in your mind, and they are very very loosely connected, but to an outside listener they are fragmented. This is the 'loose association'.
Finally, we were talking about women's rights and you rather quickly jumped to talking about drowning babies in the river. This is so jarringly out of sync with the social context and mood of the conversation that it is apparent that the emotional response does not match the situation. This is the 'inappropriate affect'. A broader example of this is that brevity tends to be expected in faster boards, but not on slower ones, but you seem to have trouble picking up on social cues li

>>1570
>common sense
Collectivist

>>727
>did you read it?
No why would I read something that's more than 10 lines.

>libertarians can learn a lot from traditionalists something something theocracy
No. On the surface traditional values like family first, gender roles etc. are superior to progressive values like everyone should be a gay trans feminist. But then the jesusfags start talking about demons and nephilim and muh prophecy and everything-I-don't-like-is-satanism and you realize they are just as mentally ill and detached from reality as the rainbow cult.

In my mind they are equivalent at this point. If you want to cut off your dick and pretend you're a woman then go ahead. If you want to worship your childish sky daddy then go ahead. Either we work together on the principles of liberty and then you fuck off. Or you skip straight to fucking off part now. Either way I don't give a fuck about your so called "culture".

I do like your picrel though

>>702 (OP) 
The libertarian to fascist pipeline was just a psyop to get libertarians back into statism.

Nolan_chart.png
[Hide] (54.3KB, 288x279)

"Libertarian/Fascist pipeline" was a crazy idea from the start.

>>702 (OP) 
While I've heard of the Libertarian to Fascist pipeline I've definitely heard of the Libertarian to Monarchist pipeline

>>1562
While I've *never* heard of the Libertarian to Fascist pipeline I've definitely heard of the Libertarian to Monarchist pipeline. 
Made a mistake my bad

>>980
you tracking down a nigger and using violence to get your car back is violating the NAP. The NAP is the most jewish concept I have ever heard in my life. Libertarians are cucks until they abandon this part of their ideology. Also in a truly libertarian society you would be steam rolled by jews so you'd have to be prepared to fight back to remain free, at all times, cause kikes are constantly scheming. So how does the NAP fit into that fucking faggot? 

Not to mention a libertarian society wouldn't work anyway with non whites.

In my opinion, the principle of non-aggression should only exist for living straight white men.
More specifically only for postpubescent heterosexual male homosapiens of non-jewish europoid-caucasoid indo-aryan nordic-germanic ethnicities, who must have pink nipples and either eyes or hair that are not black or brown in color. 

Anything and anyone who doesnt fall into the above category should be considered property, not people, they will not be protected by the laws of the NAP except in the capacity of being the property of one who does qualify for personhood.

However I may make an exception for postpubescent heterosexual males of the east-asian ethnicities, who may have non-pink nipples, and eyes and hair that are black or brown in color. Honorary status and all that.

All races other than the two mentioned above should be made extinct, especially the niggers and most especially the jews.

whatiftho.jpg
[Hide] (17.8KB, 750x212)

>>634
Bro out here honestly answering questions like some sort of boomer virgin autist not realizing that this is a thread to just ignore these comments and post dank memes while ignoring each others' points.
Conversation is dead bro. lol. lmao, even.

Even if we assume that animals for some reason have rights, you'd be hard pressed to argue that animals are capable of understanding and respecting human rights. And if animals don't respect human rights, why should humans respect animal rights?

>>1357 (OP) 
So you've finally figured out what feminism really is?

>>1359
What a Jewish rhetorical question.

>>1357 (OP) 
>What is the libertarian solution for how terrible modern work is?
End the Fed. Without fiat money printing there is no funding for any of these zombie corpos that provide zero value to anyone.

End welfare. If women can't leech off the state then they will be forced to take family more seriously.

"overeducated". Lmao.

Literally a latent Islamist complaining about women having education and participating in the market economy lmao.