>>238506
>spoiler
I do get pissed off at dumb shit, but I do not actually get pissed off at the sight of Pikachu. and I had a feeling it was you
>shit-stirring
How was it shit stirring? It's my genuine opinion, and I wasn't the only one who held it.
>they clearly aren't raiding other spaces
No, but when zzz/b/ quality goes down the shitter they present themselves as the Based Alternative™ though thinking it through, this doesn't matter that much or even seem true because their user count doesn't go up past 20 and if someone actually did try to integrate into their board culture they would find out how faggy they are on their own terms
>someone disagreed with you on the internet
It's about something important, and initially I tried steering around the topic when it was brought up by saying "I don't see the point in caring." then some fucking asshole said "shut up fag you deserve trump" and that made me a little mad but I tried collecting myself and attempted to articulate my view point in an amicable way, then I got fucking banned, which also rubbed me the wrong way, but I still held some restraint and didn't complain about /digi/, then somebody made the board rankings thread with pass at /digi/, which I also resisted the temptation to speak my mind on because I felt wrong about casting shade on /digi/ at that point since I still had some appreciation for it and would feel like an asshole raining on their parade because it seemed like they weren't harming anyone. Then when I finally saw other anons complaining about /digi/ I felt that it was appropriate to start criticizing them, and you know the rest of the story.
>concern-trolling about them for months on end
Everything I said was my actual opinion.
>I haven't complained even a hundredth about ImKampfy for banning me off 8pol over criticism of said official
I'm too new to even know what you're talking about.
>getting a bunch of internet strangers to accept orange man is a shabbos goy or trying to scare them off when they refuse to isn't going to jumpstart RaHoWa
Yeah I know, I did take myself too seriously there, but the mods (virtual and invadersmustdie) could have at least had a hands off approach such as bumplocking the thread if need be and just let the ordeal fizzle out on it's own like how the seagull kimeearu drama thing was handled. I'm also too new to even fathom this in it's entirety.
>your posts are often recognizable even without namefagging
I see no problem with this, this is the way it's supposed to be.
>started conflating me with the guy namefagging
Alright I may be retarded and overzealous ironically just like how some of the mods are, but these are the kinds of issues namefags invite when they directly attach a pseudonym to their posts instead of having people infer who they are as anonymous users.
>he probably shares your distaste for your boogeyman board
He's flippant, he shits on them, and then comes back to post on their board (through avatar fagging).