>>4311
Maybe it has something to do with the fact that every single point of that sourceless accusation is now verifiable as false. Just maybe.
>John is BO of /digi/
<Anyone with a fraction of a functioning brain knows this isn't true, all it takes is looking at the board and a completely different person actively posts with the Board Owner capcode, not John
>John is Silvia, my basis for believing this is Codexx accuses him of being Silvia
<Codexx says John is not Silvia
>zzzchan is a hub for illegal activity and the admins don't care, the only way this could be a problem is if someone, to quote, "snitches on the operation"
<This site is not an operation for illegal activity and illegal shit gets deleted and banned here all the time, this point is blatant false flagging to try to get this site shut down
>Codexx has a dossier on the people who post on /digi/ about how they do bad things, I'm not going to bother specifying what those bad things are, but just trust me, they do bad shit and Codexx has a dossier about it
<Codexx says this is untrue and no such dossier exists
Obligatory: end your life.