>We have a lot of people in the "Movement" that have the funds to build and secure legitimate structures and potentially radicalize people. But they refuse to do so anyway, so they can either bitch about some irrelevant issues, or put stickers up that nobody but some crackhead niggers would see and do pointless marches.
The radicalization is not a good selling point. The radicalization will happen at a later stage, on the fringe of it, silently. You will convince far more people if you tell them that the money should go to Whites to fund our own institutions, our medias, our lawyers, our banks. Nothing forbids Whites from creating banks of which the leaders would be part of the White Cabal without showing any signs of it. Even in the most restrictive White nations you are still allowed to say that you want to create a system for Whites that includes all the aspect of the social, political, legal and economical life. Yet almost nobody dares being openly pro-White on the political stage despite how easy it is. Is it low risk? No, we all know of the social stigmatization. But why does it happen? Because we have no network, because if you lose your job there's no fellow White man to give you another one and give the finger to the antifas and other screeching abominations.
>Who are you to say that Hunter of Pedocommunist Activists, Breivik is "mentally unstable"?
>Or Tarrant who killed ISIS jihadists?
To a certain degree, yes. Again, Roof wanted to kill people in schools. Crusius wanted to kill random people. Tarrant went to Pakistan and befriend Muslims there, even prayed in one of their mosques and he praised them, despite how Pakistan is a hot bed of radicalization and terrorism. Bowers was such a retard that he took gunning down a handful of geriatric kikes as an achievement while not even able to take down the local rabbi, which he could have done in a billion other different much more efficient and secure ways. Breivik was such a nutcase that he wrote a thousand and five hundred pages of a pointless and boring zionist dick sucking book which would have been the only thing left of him if he had been shot down.
>Who the fuck cares about Crusius?
Oh, now nobody cares about him now? Quite an interesting change!
>Because some retards here idolize him?
Because he's part of Terrorgram and "his" manifesto makes it clear that he considered a different set of targets after reading the NZ shooter's manifesto IIRC. Our dear friend Pat C. wink wink is a member of the club, whether you like it or not.
>He isn't an Fascist
If the medias say he is, then he is. According to the manifesto, he seems to be close to it. Not that being an avowed Fascist prevented gushers and gooners from worshiping him abundantly years ago.
>It's like claiming random negro gang-bangers to be fed assets.
Niggers don't write manifestos and don't trigger governments to pass repressive laws on speech or guns.
>what about: Tarrant and Breivik
They're the only two guys who seemed pro enough about it and it just happens that their own operation are the more involved in terms of politics and real world events. I will return to Breivik one day because I will need to shut your mouth once and for all about him, but for Tarrant there's this little bizarre aspect, a classic in terms of false flags, that he just happened to rampage through the city the same day a whole week long international anti-terrorist exercise was about to conclude in the same area. Just like with 9/11 for example, the usual "is it a drill?" that confuses the local authorities. Tarrant's car plate coded for 11/9 btw. I mean we can go through the whole thing again. The video fed let to run for more than a quarter of an hour despite it being no surprise at all to all the authorities that were warned in advance, monitored internet and kept their eyes on the chan. Or like that red herring nigger dressed in military fatigues and carrying a long black bag that could have contained assault rifles, arrested in front of a school. Or all the bombs found in several cars across the city. Or when Tarrant stopped his car for no good reason whatsoever and when he decided to resume his course he almost brushed against the car coming behind him, as if he was on a bizarre tight schedule. It would have been very unfortunate of him to get hit by another car just because he couldn't afford to wait like two more seconds. I don't like that kind of bizarre stuff because it follows no logic for it to happen. I'm also leaving out all the well poisoning that's done to create confusion (it's fake, no blood, look at the mags disappearing, etc.). With all of this of course leading to a government conveniently pulling presto-laws out of its hat to ban more gun equipment and have the right to criminalize and prosecute people for possessing one document or a video. All of which happened in a minuscule country being the ideal small scale laboratory for such social changes before being eventually pushed into larger countries. And why not do it in say, one of the European countries he visited like Germany or France for example. Nobody is phased about the events going on in kiwi island. If you want to kick a racial war for real that's where I'd actually do my stuff.
>You must be a Burgeranon watching too much Sopranos, Mafiosos in Western and Eastern Europe, including the Balkans flash themselves with fucking gold-bling all the time, luxury cars and crappy Andrew Tate-tier youtube videos.
No Netflix here, sorry.
>Nigger please, Bulgarians are already making books for the American Futurist and exporting to them. There's loads of foreign volunteers ready to fight for our cause.
It was a rhetorical question. The networks are not impressive. Burgeoning for some of them and only some countries do seem to have anything worth a note. Their efforts remain rather limited and timid. We won't get anywhere until they grow in strength.
>Okay, I am not the anon you replied to, but what he meant is that thought without action is harmful and it is the worst kind of pseudo-intellectualism.
>They are best as combined together.
The well deserved Duh Award of the year. What next? Fire without fuel can't burn?