>>6355
>Jews haven't radicalised anyone.
Maybe step out of your basement one day. Their actions are pushing people into literally hating them for exactly that. Of course we're not directly gaining much from this as Whites, but indirectly it weakens them. The issue however is that as their grip slightly loosens, it's only exploited by other foreigners who are not ashamed of defending their interests and even have the law on their side, contrary to Whites, since as you know it any White who fights for his interests is a [racist antisemitic hateful supremacist xenophobic bigot]. In the state we find ourselves in, I consider the beginning of some form of radicalization, whether it comes from the left or the right, as a regained freedom to openly oppose and attack the Jews. It's a first step and obviously nowhere close to a White radicalization the way we need it. It's nevertheless also bringing normies to think twice about it. Only old people stick to the TV but you get much more crunchy bits on internet and that has an effect. From there on, it becomes easier to tell them that all of this was already denounced by the NSDAP. And you can double down by telling them that many leftists converted back then once they saw the light. In respect for this board we can even point at Mussolini's own path who closely orbited far-left groups before moving hard right once he got more educated.
>And no, violence upon whites doesn't radicalise the whites which roll over like spaniels and start big boy crayon drawing their latest plans to get "political representation" or some other pipe dream.
You are wrong about that too. In modern democracy, the only reason the right wing still manages to reach around 50% despite the huge foreigner voting base that goes full left is because most Whites align with right-wing views and as we can see today it's largely tugged by far-right parties. Not that these parties are anything good really but people want them to be good and want them to be far right. This however is only for observational purposes because there's no solution in democracy. It's useful as a metric on trends.
There's definitely a huge amount of waste too but I presume a lot of it comes from the boomers. The right side of the spectrum stays silent and rarely goes marching in the streets. On top of that you have all the people who don't vote. Of those who are Whites, there's no doubt that many have lost all hope in seeing a hard line right wing politician defend their interests, but their beliefs are there.
I also cannot think you are honest when you see that no White person would grow some massive hatred for the system, foreigners and those who generated the issues in our countries when they see the insults, rapes and murder and how most Whites work honestly to pay for parasites. Once again you don't seem to have much grasp with the real life and the way politics work. I'm more than certain that many Whites would gladly follow in and let themselves taken by the gush of air if a path was opened for them. They can't keep containing that resentment forever.
Masses free themselves, but one can easily observe that things have become worse nonetheless and masses can be prepared, made to some extent more compliant with our positions. The violence that existed twenty years ago seemed subdued in comparison to what we experience everyday and it didn't make it to internet the way it does today. Denying this evolution is ridiculous, it is verily real. Granted, it may be frustrating that it takes so long, that we have to reach that point of inflexion and despair for more interesting things to happen, but we cannot rewrite human nature. At large people tend to wait for the last moment when things can't get worse before really snapping. They always hope the issues will go away if they squint hard enough and if the evil eye would just set its gaze upon someone else.
>But it can cause a huge media shitstorm (heighten anxiety).
A media shit storm, totally artificial and part of the keyfabe, only happens when the Jews decide so, dumbass, because they control the medias. Like with Trump. That line of yours reminds me of the usual excuse acceleranons kept defending Breivik by claiming that he was forcing them to follow his oh so clever plot at manipulation, as if little Breivik could force the medias to say what he wanted them to say. Ridiculous. He, you and I don't have power nor any control over the medias.
Frankly I cannot believe something as banal as this has to be repeated there, especially to someone like you who thinks of himself as based and radical. You have no power over the medias, get it through your thick skull.
Foreigners being killed in groups is only exploited by the medias to lament their loss, make them martyrs, denounce racism and increase the powers of the surveillance state. Always.
>Whereas for example when you had that National Action lad take out some race traitor whore it wasn't talked about as much comparatively.
Yet it was the right thing to do, assuming she had any kind of relevant and effective political power. Only because otherwise killing a mere coalburner is retarded and won't get us anywhere in the grand scheme of things.
>No, we accelerationists aren't building an army
Thank you for admitting it, and that's the problem. Let's also be honest, you're typing this but you would never pick anything like an assault rifle and go gun down and kill a dozen pakis in a restaurant during a wedding or some shit because you're not even stupid enough to do that and you know your life would be wasted, so you're just lying when you pretend agreeing with them and defending that massively retarded theory of accelerationism that's all about mass shooters burning fiercely for a few hours before being thrown away with as much care as you'd toss aside a used and leaky condom.
>Though there were only a few dozens of them, French antifascists managed to seriously wreak havoc on National Socialist occupation of France, for example. Look up "clandestine cell system".
Not only did they benefit from the ((( Allies ))) support, but that's apples and oranges with mass shooters. Need I remind you of the meaning of clandestine action and how they did everything silently, trying not to be caught? Even better, imagine if they had gone the way of mass shooters, like for example sending one of their own to an open market in a small city known for its collaborationism, killing two dozen civilians there, and then surrendering to the French police and the Gestapo after that. Pick the word counter-productive and then realize how it barely scratches the surface of how demented and bad it would be for the Resistance.