/b/ - Random

72f9e9feade143df00500c6c03c5355e9eb36bca3d2a2accd3cc894c6dc89927.jpg
[Hide] (30.3KB, 460x288) Reverse

8c68abfe4cd75dad4c3b3bdb7f902d980931ecb4311da71e643a719c25fdd750.png
[Hide] (1.8MB, 1024x1024) Reverse

>>332078 (OP) 
Do It Yourself /diy/ is an excellent board, when populated properly. There's a lot of brilliant anons out there, with specialized knowledge which LLM's cannot replace. I'm sure they're dying to post their engineering projects, which are good for everyone. The discussion of patent law, scams in that sector, and how fraudulent overlapping industries are is often part of the board.

>>332079
> Do It Yourself /diy/ is an excellent board, when populated properly. There's a lot of brilliant anons out there, with specialized knowledge which LLM's cannot replace.

I agree anon. Reminds me of the music making thread (>>248984).

Such topic also encompasses https://trashchan.xyz/agdg/ and https://alogs.space/robowaifu/.

0aba47c694eb26a5b4d9c9d961b4efefefc64521.jpg
[Hide] (191.6KB, 1125x1729) Reverse

>>332078 (OP) 

Honestly?

I wish for a board centered around a positive attitude to life.

>>332524
If you want something like /nice/, you could ask on /meta/ but you would have to be willing to moderate it frequently enough.

Or was it /kind/? Maybe both exist.

>>332524
>>332525
The thing I don't like about those kind of boards is how easy they can become rulecucked hugboxes.

>>332530
Guess I misunderstood what you meant.

>>332525
>>332526
https://wapchan.org/kind/
/kind/ already exists. It almost died.

dad, go to church

9ff903a6ea96fa0314fe6aa8efbe072e3e5fbf3c.jpg
[Hide] (204.4KB, 1080x1080) Reverse

>>332530
> The thing I don't like about those kind of boards is how easy they can become rulecucked hugboxes.
You have a point.

A positive attitude to life isn't necessarily kind.

>>332553
>A positive attitude to life isn't necessarily kind.
This. Some of the societies which had the most positivity about life and their role in the universe were the most acquainted with natural law and the cruelty thereof.

I (>>332524) am not (>>332530).

How frequently are we talking about?

>>332558 (me)
Sorry, meant I (>>332530) am not (>>332524).

>>332524
I would support this.

>>332553
>A positive attitude to life isn't necessarily kind.
That is true. It is honest. But also allows a person to pursue an ideal or image. And And other good things. Like a sense of humor etc.

>>332530
I dont think I would mind a rulecucked hugbox. Or at least, have the option.

V-tuber, /vt/, simple

>>332588
Pretty sure there are several boards for that on the webring.

4810.jpg
[Hide] (887.2KB, 1024x2850) Reverse

A board without ugliness like this.

>>332949
Learn to hide threads

15ec60ad9b15b7e23b057581e088e70236600ea3.jpg
[Hide] (924.4KB, 2752x2136) Reverse

>>333703
> where did all the good anons go
And here is another one...

>>334087
Lost...

I’ve spent some time thinking about this and believe that the answer is the most retarded concept possible for a board.

/shit/ - Shitflinging

Spam is allowed, obnoxious text formatting is turned on, and the goal is to overwhelm other anons with strange insults and the like. Anons pick something to stand behind, like the country they live in or an anime, and then go on board terrorism campaigns spamming their “territory” while labeling everything else as inferior. The catalog would probably look bipolar, one thread could just be “FUCK PEPE” with no context and the one right next to it could be someone calmly outlining their points on why Bosnia is the worst Balkan state and should be destroyed.

>>334101
That could work as a "release valve" to cleanup /b/. I wonder if this has been tried before.

>>334101
>>334105
It seems like a pretty convoluted solution to an abstract problem that ambiguously exists.

>>334101
Basically /soy/ without the 'jaks. Problem is, a board like that doesn't have a reason to not allow soyjaks on there, and you know what happens if you let soyfags get a foot in the door.
It becomes the destruction of the site as a whole, as the soy cancer cannot hope to be contained to that board.

>>334109
>>334109
Even if all jakkers were to die (deservedly) somehow, I’ll admit my idea probably won’t come to fruition because board “conflicts” seem to have to start organically first on some random site, and then whatever random place it happens in must also have tolerant moderation for it to get off the ground. It’s only natural I guess, after all the internet is about sending and receiving documents, not playing propaganda games with them.