/b/ - Random

What you listed is only a small part of the problem. Corporations outsourcing to pajeets are responsible. Software that follows proper form is rare outside of niche circles. Software developers are forced to blindly follow orders to keep their jobs. It's an extremely depressing and demoralizing job. Salespeople and marketers make everything cancerous. Software developers are forced to implement technical debt and bloat in order to make themselves more difficult to replace. It's rare to meet someone working as a software developer that knows or cares about it.

>>244145 (OP) 
So why would you not use Linux like a real human? no one forces you to use Windows. other than some ancient shit software  that is required for work in some places.
 pro tip any game with anti cheat is not worth playing in the first place because you are nothing more than a hamster in a wheel chasing a drip feed while they do bare minimum about cheaters with a shoe string budget
which the time you spent could have been used on something actually worthwhile than what is essentially jerking off for hours feeling nothing

Use better software, lmao.

>incompatible with old operating systems
This happens because they use Microsoft build tools and libraries. Updating the tool will make the programs it outputs incompatible with old systems, so they have no control over it. 99.99% of human population will think their software is dead and obsolete if it hasn't had an update in the last 4 days, so it is literally and physically impossible for them not to update it. But realistically the fault lies with Microsoft, everyone's programs would work in Windows XP if Microsoft wasn't full of kikes and jeets who break compatibility on purpose.

That's just compiled programs though, which make up about 2% of modern software. The other 98% is just repackaged google chrome, so if chrome drops compatibility then so will 98% of all software on earth.

>>244987
Then do it.
Or what, you can't?

you see a lot of left-wingers and normalcattle blaming bots and A.I for the destruction of the internet and tech, but the obvious culprits are pajeets and clueless politicians and CEO's, a lot of apps and manufactured objects (cars, airplanes, phones) that don't need any updating or re-design are being modified just in the name of “progress” and end up becoming worse than previous versions.
pajeets not only destroyed things by being devs, but also by just existing, look how many horrible apps get five stars thanks to pajeets, while the rest of the world is complaining that it keeps getting worse.

>>245187
It's a deeper rooted issue than that. Social media and opening the web with smartphones was one of the worst mistakes we could have happened.

>>245206
>posts on social media how bad social media is

>>245206
If you want to go that far, I would say the internet has ruined the internet.

>>245326
Social media has made itself the only way that humans communicate, this both makes it the problem and makes it necessary to use it even if you think it's a problem.

dc264e3fdcc35f466607a62cfde9c6b0e6bd49e9db3ff6bd03cf68f69cb72219.jpg
[Hide] (139.4KB, 740x960) Reverse

>it's the "anonymous imageboards are social media!!!111" mouthbreathing pedant again

>>245431
Actually, it's not me and it's not pedantic to label them as such when the label (i.e. not your autistic personal defintion so you can feel special) fits, but good to see you showed up to cry about it.

107055a815f54afa08ff4c95f7c5bcd55f4a9fb7482fed8b50bc24c0d050aaf0.jpg
[Hide] (91.4KB, 575x310) Reverse

>>245431
Social = Boards
Media = Image