/b/ - Random

As a white I don't give a fuck about women and accepted dying alone
No amount of dating advice can help you with modern women especially American women
>No or almost non existent value
>Just have fun  with her  and ask her questions bro
Like I don't give a fuck the only value she has is her body if at all which she is no different than a flashlight with a attitude. I can only imagine her beating her own children
And the stupid bitch probably will just jump to another guy in a week anyways

>self improvement
this is some gay shit  only men care about women only care if you look like a faggot  which yeah go ahead dig your own grave
>ear rings and makeup 
now you look like a lesbian dyke ROFL

OkCupid-Chart4-blogSpan.jpg
[Hide] (52.2KB, 480x510) Reverse

okcupid-race-ratings.png
[Hide] (17.2KB, 495x391) Reverse

okcupid_smv_confirmation.jpg
[Hide] (218.8KB, 1400x650) Reverse

taken_down_okcupid_dating_site_statistics.png
[Hide] (31.2KB, 764x313) Reverse

The part about popularizing the knowledge about female hypergamy wasn't a mistake. You are better off knowing the truth about women than remaining ignorant of it.

aad049dc10798fa8bcad6965d987e93e2920a550dc58f4cbf3806498ea822b5e.png
[Hide] (390.6KB, 2278x968) Reverse

>>252170
And the biggest bomb of them all.
This image alone may drive a man to despair.

>>252171
tl;dr
Does that DNA gets incorporated in chromosomes and replicated, or just remaining there for a single generation?

>>252170
>best looking men 20-30
I call bullshit on this
>too many women who just want daddy not young men

>>252174
How many young men are loaded? That was about looks, not the potential benefits.

>>252176
>women are essentially prostitutes will go out of their way to even ignore who they find attractive
this is the type of shit that turns men gay.

>>252177
Look especially carefully into the fourth graph I posted. The meaning of the dotted line there. Guess how men's looks are rated by women collectively. What percentage is judged to be above average for them? Simple statistics would imply that to be 50%, right? Haha, please don't turn gay because of the discrepancy there.

>>252178
Google that yourself. Put this into the Google Images search box "okcupid male attractiveness graph" for a more straightforward version than this one.

>>252178
>>252181
I basically already have dedicated my life to 2D. Nothing is going to change unless an Asian girl just randomly approaches me just being a decent human being.
>white women are horrid creatures
>I don't really find other women really attractive
But thanks regardless.

>>252149 (OP) 
Well Openis
If black women weren't such insufferable obnoxious thots. I wouldn't have to waste my time gooning to whatever is out there besides gore or vore.

>>252171
>>252173
The only part of a woman that matters there in the long term is her eggs, in nerdspeak called oocytes.

>>252186
Or ova (single form ovum), from Latin.

>>252177
I guess the preferred choice of older women is somewhat younger than her because he needs to be still alive when she gets really old to take care of her instead of dying in advance.

>>252149 (OP) 
Well yeah it's just nigger/jeet sexpest lingo retooled for white people. They end up going after 14 year olds like niggers do for a reason.
If anything, the Manosphere is the most anti-white psyop after groypers.

>>252192
And that falls apart when they want children so no one is really happy besides young men who don't want children and even if I were an older guy with money I wouldn't even want those girls because they just see me as a bank account and for them to eventually take my money when I die.
<jokes on them I would give it all to the children
>cannot even tell if I am capable of being a good father 
>unsure of if I should even want children let alone even take advances from a woman
>insecurities and flaws that make me sink like an anchor

>>252195
You should rather set up a trust instead of leaving a will, because wills are too easily overturned in court if too one-sided.

>>252198
This was meant here: >>252197

>>252170
Hypergamy is not real.
Women evolved to survive under male domination. As such, they never prioritized decision making ability, they simply surrendered to the man with the most resources, which was not necessarily the most genetically eugenic man. That is why you don't see women having kids at all, with anyone now; the survival impetus has been lifted and male domination made illegal. Thus, all relations between the sexes collapse.

You incels are dumb and factually mistaken.

>>252171
That means we can make a test to see if she is lying or not
Woo, science will force them to not be whores after this retarded system collapses

>>252204
That would force them to always use condoms to hide their mileage. Nothing really changes on the fundamental level.

>>252203
"non-paternity in genetic records" into
scholar.google.com
You are welcome.

>>252206
Especially this:
https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/sciadv.aay6195
>inb4 niggers don't count
You can't exactly test the white primitive societies for their cheating habits now, can you?

>>252205
>>252205
Condom sex sucks

1618716011149.jpg
[Hide] (117KB, 671x960) Reverse

>>252149 (OP) 

>>252208
They really don't tho, Africa is literally the only place on earth a woman can get enough food and be safe enough to have and raise offspring on her own, everywhere if a woman doesn't have a man around to help or at least live in a society maintained by men, she and her offspring will die for the simple fact that food isn't easily available.

34fefc58e58b736bc8eb55b998527ccfec3e3c9d1ebeea18a53e305b79ad2701.jpg
[Hide] (7KB, 261x268) Reverse

>>252254
Relatable, but the next thing I'd do would be getting millions from "simps" by posting pictures of my feet online or whatever the fuck.

>>252280
>get online stalkers who find out your location and rape you
gaaaayyy

>>252279
>be safe enough
From what? She isn't safe from other niggers. Work on your argument more.

>>252285
She has got distance and male relatives, Africa is an easy ecology naturally, they would be farmers otherwise
In the natural state of the nigger, wild animals are their biggest threat

>>252280
This, Honestly if I was a woman. I'd be taking advantage of how easy life can be for me thanks to simps and thirsty niggas. 

>>252282
You're a damn fool

>>252287
The same climatic zone goes around the Earth intersecting with other land masses too. I'm not convinced.

>>252290
>you're a damn fool he says 
>while idols have been found for something simple as a reflection in their eyes

>>252291
That Africa is an easy ecology or that she-niggers are safe enough to raise offspring basically on her own in the natural state, lending to selection for r type traits in the population, meaning the data collected about mating isn't relevant to populations outside of Africa?

>>252302
For example New Zealand's Maoris had also rather easy subsistence lifestyle, if you don't count their famous tribal violence. I wonder how they treated infidelity before the coming of white people there. Apply your reasoning to them too. Does it fit?

>>252304
Oh yea, parts of Asia and Australia are easy too, sorry about that
Normally, a women would go around a fuck a bunch of brothers, and the brothers wouldn't be a threat to the offspring because even it wasn't theirs, they are at least its uncle. But she doesn't really get investment from them, it is lot like how chimps do things
No where in Europe is an easy ecology, so the cheating rates would be lower among those populations

>>252318
So was it always the guy deciding, or was there also the female preference who she was going to fuck and who she wasn't? Because without strict mate guarding there is a place for hypergamy manifesting itself through infidelity as well. And there is something called the extended phenotype that sometimes might be a throwback to the past before the migration period to a harsher environment. Things like preferred behavior due to inheritance have their own inertia. What does make you think that "hypergamy is not real"?

>>252326
The most obvious part is the different partner preference depending on which phase of menstrual cycle she actually is. When women are the most fertile, their preferences change in rather predictable way. Quite underhanded, really.

>>252334
*she actually is in

>>252326
hypergamy is a k-type orientation trait, thus a more hypergamous a woman is less likely to commit infidelity

>>252340
Bite this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ovulatory_shift_hypothesis

>>252341
evolutionary history was not full of preference, that cycle is probably to try to get the man who is the father of the offspring to be more protective. Men do care about what women want, unfortunately

The manosphere is full of shit. The only ones who are right are the blackpilled incels, because they at least acknowledge bitter cold truth instead of trying to cope with bullshit that doesn't work.

>>252347
People selling fortune cookies would bankrupt if their whole stock were misfortune cookies. You have to farm those who want to read your blog or browse your YT channel. Doom and gloom leads to low return rate.

>>252350
>would bankrupt
The opposite is actually true. People want reason to be doom sayers.

1515008209_00037.jpg
[Hide] (87.9KB, 1280x720) Reverse

>>252347
kys,, cuck.

>>252353
The manosphere is an antiwhite psyop designed to turn white men into homosexual pests and women into radlib feminists.

>>252347
Those people where a joke years ago. I know the source of the black pill meme, omega virgin revolt. 

As you can see he sounds like the most bitter faggot ever whereas most well adjusted Manosphere fags just moved on. Maybe they are family men nowadays or even artsy fartsy freaks publishing weirdo epic for other artsy farts freaks. 

Your favorite mene came from there:
https://archive.ph/PqcM8

>>252354
>implying women reading those "misogynists" at all for any reason

>>252354
This is what losers like David Futurelle would have written if he was a neonazi. Instead he was just some fat liberal dork.

>>252354
What is there especially antiwhite? If it were targeted psyop, why is the second graph there favoring whites the most? >>252170
Please say next it was all kikes posting undercover.

>>252354
It didn't help, but I think knowing is always better then ignorance

>>252355
Of course they're a "joke". They were born subhumans who can't ever connect with women due to their innate totally inhuman inferiority. Their sole reason to exist is to be trampled underneath by the quietly desperate masses of slave niggercattle trying to find any old subhuman beneath them, in order to mock and terrorize them and make them beholden to others as slave subhumans.

>>252363
Good luck connecting with modern women. Preferably not through alimony.

What is funny is that people will resent you if you're single, not looking, and fine money wise.
My favorite is to treat dogs better then women, I have made women cry over that

>>252367
the most funny shit is saying the exactly what women say and watching them melt down
>Sorry I'm not interested in women over 5'3 and 150lb and aren't asian

>>252369
>women over 5'3 
Why you want your kids to be short?

>>252371
Sexual attraction and cuteness and tall women are insufferable. 
>kids to be short
There's literally nothing wrong with being short  but asking everyone to be tall is an impossible task and just plain dumb.

>>252369
>and aren't asian
Haha, good luck with the little Elliots, yellow fever faggot.

>>252379
It builds character unless they are a niggerfaggot. oh well another drop into the sea.

>>252379
At least daughters are likely cute and hopefully smart.

>>252383
Just abort the boys, problem solved. You're welcome.

>>252388
The chinks do exactly the opposite. At least until recently.

>>252389
They have the deficit of women for that reason, lol.

>>252389
>>252390
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex-ratio_imbalance_in_China
And they blame that on white devils stealing their women, lol.

catdevil.gif
[Hide] (1.5MB, 434x434) Reverse

>>252392
>white devils stealing their women
Isn't it mostly their own fault anyways? Even then I would gladly do it any day.

>>252392
>>252390
Yeah, I still trying to figure out the end goal of that
Was it to force thier men to go out and take war brides because they are going to get a lot more nigger if they do that

>>252396
There was one lost soul from China during the 8ch times cursing in broken English on its /b/ one day. Fun times. I couldn't decipher his hieroglyphs though.

>>252399
translating chinese hieroglyphs is impossible even learning japanese hieroglyphs are easier because you just see them and eventually understand them if not you can look them up and don't need to be a faggot who studies it because there's only a limited number of them you will likely ever see.

divorcechart2_tcm77-305170.png
[Hide] (14.6KB, 526x338) Reverse

reddit_filename.jpeg
[Hide] (46.2KB, 984x655) Reverse

People naively believe that people are by default associating and dating according to the principle of assortative mating, connecting like to like. 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assortative_mating
Similar levels of attractiveness, wealth, education, beliefs etc. The hypergamy shatters those expectations, doesn't it? Nooooo, it has to be a psyop! And the moon is made of cheese. Women in relationships are never content, because in their eyes they deserve better. Anyone they are currently with is someone they settled on in lack of a better prospect. You can package that in various fancy ways, the core issue stays the same. You can't make a woman happy, because she deserves better, she deserves more, because her eggs make her more precious than you. It's not your fault. Once the initial love cools in several years of living together, she starts wondering if it's the time to divorce. 
No, it's the insane ravings of blackpilled virgins, right? Then why the pics related? Another psyop, right?

>>252398
If they want to colonize Africa, don't they need some chink/nigger mutts serving there as a cultural buffer? Those chink guys without women have no other choice than to date she-niggers if they want to have kids. Having kids is a part of ancestor worship for them. Without kids their ancestors would have nobody to remember in the future. Major loss of face. That's my personal guess.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Face_(sociological_concept)

>>252492
*to remember them

>>252492
Preferably male kids, of course.

>>252487
Do you mean to say that they think like this now, or always?

>>252598
Probably always. Human nature (including the conflict of interest between its sexes) doesn't change that fast as the culture.

>>252601
Only now there is a far wider assortment of couples to compare yourself with. Especially on Facebook and other social media.

>>252602
What is the most funny is this:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/better-divorce/202212/will-you-be-happier-after-divorce
I linked only one example, but almost all say the same. As long as it's not a pathological marriage (with severe personality issues manifesting within) the divorce doesn't make them happier. Funny, right?

>>252359
It encourages white men to become Jack Murphyesque sodomites and pimps it's all downstream of PUA garbage that exacerbated the feminism surge in the early 2010's. It's corrosive to white people because it's the mating tactics of rapey niggers that rape 14 year olds because "age ain't none but a numbah. dey's need to lawrn somehaow."

>>252632
It presents them with tools to pursue their desires. The fault lies with the desires, not with the tools. Otherwise you would also support any new legislature against guns being available for the general populace. Assuming you aren't a two-faced faggot, that  is.

>>252633
It's corrosive and degenerate. All it does is leave single mothers and rapey males in their wake.

>>252638
All that guns leave is corpses and the wounded. They are dangerous and subversive.

See what I mean?

>>252639
they are dysgenic if that is what you mean, but also an inevitability

>>252641
The same rules apply to both issues.

>>252632
Well, when social standards tell men that if they aren't getting laid every day and if they aren't getting filthy rich working 25 hours, 8 days a week, then they're literal subhuman dysgenic autistic spastic losers who should die for the good of society, then you're going to get PUA-type faggots trying everything in their power not to be the dalits of sexual capitalism.

PUA fags trying to associate with MRA has always bothered me. Their solution to dealing with women is akin to throwing gasoline on a fire. They act as ammunition for the complaints women raise in regards to men. Casual hookups only further atomization of the family unit and degeneration toward a Brave New World-style society. The government has already proven itself to be a poor substitute for a father. Pumping and dumping women is as much a violation of the sexual contract as women trying to collect betabux is. The first step in defeating the jewish hegemony is to conquer your own inner jew.

>>252644
>"bad money drives out good"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gresham%27s_law
It probably won't work.

>>252644
How to protest against unfair rules that you are forcibly subjected to act under? Either you cheat (PUAs) or boycott (losers). Or remain a good cattle when led to a slaughterhouse.

>>252644
>conquer your own inner jew
He ain't that bad, he is a home Jew, keeps the worse Jews out
Lmao

>>252340
That's the main argument of manosphere for male self-improvement. As long as her hypergamy is satisfied, she is less likely to stray or leave altogether. Disregarding other variables that could and would interfere. For example for the tendency of sex getting less and less available within the marriage with time, the happiness treadmill making her less cognizant that she actually won something by marrying, and the mistaken belief that if you always agree with her, she will be actually grateful for that simping. Or the influence of her hen circle that would rather see her shooting herself in the foot if they have any say in that after doing the same thing themselves. Those are the most common issues that I can recall.

>>252764
You'd think so but it does not work like that in reality.
>waaaaa whyh aren't you spending all your timee with me
>bitch will complain if you don't have gym equipment at home
There's no winning with women. There is no pleasing a bitch who will complain about everything and nothing at the same time.

>>252765
You know, you aren't supposed to solve any problems, you are supposed to empathize with her feelings. Big difference, lol.

>>252768
>you aren't supposed to solve any problems.
I know that. BUT women know exactly what they're getting into when a guy says they like anime and video games.
>you are supposed to empathize 
Duh

>>252764
You also gotta factor in that we have not been selected to be mentally stable for the last 200 years, and the fact that most of our evolutionary history there were less men than women, because are men more likely to die hunting or fighting, so the evolutionary match is for women to have to fight to have a chance of reproduction, while men just had to survive to reproduce, so hypergamy can't develop in a hunter/gatherer level
Hypergamy is the result of civilization's effects on our evolution, as civilization comes about when the natural carrying capacity of the environment is reached, and cooperating becomes a necessity for survival, and women need to be picky to fine a certain type of man if any of their offspring is to survive.

>>252772
As much I'm loath to admit that, any selective pressure is better than no pressure. It's a pity its burden is disproportionately heavy on men. Mutations happen all the time, and without a mechanism to weed them off, we would be worse with each generation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_load

>>252772
We need to somehow apply selection pressure on women too. There are many dysgenic subhuman women breeding as it is.

>>252775
Isn't that what abortion does?

>>252774
Yeh, that that why the industrial revolution has been a disaster
hypergamy is not eugenic tho, they will select for the tallness at the expense of health, or for behavior that is a detriment of society as long as it benefits her offspring as individuals
Female choice itself is dysgenic, really

>>252776
Yes, however it makes dysgenics lasts longer over all as it doesn't allow a mass of psychopaths to build up sufficiently enough to collapse the ecology.
Pick your poison...

>>252778
Someday artificial selection would be allowed too. Someday...

075bc0f9ff6b7b0a6ade59a241f528f4be2a6e3a899dee70288a558a594279f6.png
[Hide] (108.3KB, 559x540) Reverse

>everything is going normal as usual
>the industrial revolution has been a disaster

>>252783
Things that work slowly, like plate tectonics, for example, are too difficult for little minds like yours.

>>252782
We have the technology now, the jew just keeps it expensive, assholes
Please note that sperm selection is still problem with it though

>>252786
Chinks supposedly go as far as editing human DNA. It's sometimes a boon to have little conscience, lol.

>>252789
Lying as propaganda, mag, bug people do that a lot
Editing existing DNA isn't possible as of yet, selecting from 1000s of embryos with known gene sequences can be done, and eliminating the regression to the mean in your offspring is possible, but like 60k per kid
What is an even bigger tragedy is that the elite are keeping it expensive so their descendants won't have competition and that limits the data that can be collected that could potentially go beyond preventing regression, and allow one to make their offspring have more IQ points then the parents every time, it could be cumulative every generation, just smarter and smarter until total dominance is achieved eternally

>>252796
Not necessarily on zygotes. They want physical immortality too, so they try for spare parts for their bodies that fit perfectly.

>>252797
The biggest obstacle is difficulty in manipulating DNA methylation on demand, not only strictly the sequence. Lots of your close range history is stored in methylation patterns. Some also say that represents the "planned obsolescence" for mammals in general too.

>>252800
>>252797
I honestly wish them luck, but bugs really don't have the genetic set up to push things like they need to

>>252804
At least they would gather big data more easily.

>>252774
Someone post the graph of women statistically selecting for dysgenic men which invalidates the whole selective pressure garbage already. Unfortunately I don't have it right now.

I'd rather turn this upside down and say that it's actually men that are the selectors, the problem is just that we have a jewish society with feminist jews that has promoted feminism to destroy our values and society as a whole.

>>252772
>we have not been selected to be mentally stable for the last 200 years
Wrong. Most stability and social achievements came directly from the patriarchy. The problem is that we have a jewish infection that doesn't want white westerners to be happy or prosperous so they turn everything on it's head in hopes that they can continue without immune system activation to avoid getting removed.

>>252812
Those feminists getting artificial insemination are a counterargument. Unless they specifically go for the sperm of confirmed homosexuals, like is the case for some clinic in Cali, lol.

>>252815
That's cheating though. Boys and girls without a father or even a 'real father' typically have a horrible time. I have friends that didn't have a father, good men and they have a complex and struggle all their life with a feeling of inferiority because of it. The women I have seen without fathers or a real one that couldn't put the foot down easily turn into thots.

Testing.

>>252805
Yeah, they do that better, but innovation comes from individuals with genes that make them outliers, not big data
>>252812
>Wrong
I'm talking about the dysgenics of the industrial ecology. Low mental and physical health get selected for when under industrialization, low intelligence, low mental stability, low ethnocentrism, all comes in a  packaged together, it is why liberalism became so prevalent, the genes that make our minds are rotting
The jew takes advantage, but the fault is our evolution that makes us too non ethnocentric

>>252812
For Arabs it's the men that are the selectors indeed, and how much good did that give them? Without the inflow of foreign harem slaves they are a laughingstock regarding  many objective metrics.

>>252835
That encourages conquering though

>>252835
The problem is that they are arab brownoids. Not that they are men.

>>252837
Then compared to other brownoids. Are they standing out, positively?

>>252834
You have a point but I really do not think its organically related to the industrial revolution when you consider how ((( tptb ))) have intentionally corrupted our societies and moral fabric promoting degeneracy and trying to make us live a decidedly horrid and inorganic fake lifestyle for decades for ((( control ))) reasons quite simply. 

Liberalism and voooting are also wholly fake movements when they don't have a shred of common sense like ethnocentrism(see printing press jews didn't allow it as intended) These things really have a tendency to normalize and repair themselves without much help if the bad influences are removed.

>>252835
In the west we never really limited selection and did it more intelligently, but men still controlled it, we just did the luxury model where we just limited women from wage working much and taking on certain roles to make sure that they wouldn't become tainted and distracted from being mothers and we did have taboos on degenerate behaviors. 
Both men and women would still get to choose. Now the problems are way worse obviously. The arabs took the much more unsophisticated approach while still marrying their cousins, but being unsophisticated and so religious it's harder for any outsiders to mess with it lol.

>>252648
The "losers" should organize and revoke women's suffrage. PUA faggotry just plays into the jew's hand. If healthy family structure is forsaken, correcting malfunctions in society becomes much harder.

>>252847
Should and could rarely align.

>>252847
Things like PUA is for men what makeup is for women there's nothing wrong with it. Nowadays it's the women that initiate all breakups and divorces anyway. Men really don't. Except for chad but I hear even chad(the type that isn't a hypersexual monkey) is struggling with this degeneracy so lol.

>>252764
>happiness treadmill
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedonic_treadmill
Memory gets spotty, apparently.

>>252834
This type of research heavily relies on big data, for example.

>>252925
Sure, and they might do something, but meaningful progress about most shit comes from people with genes that make them look at the world in totally different ways to anyone else on top of being hyper intelligent

>>252927
How many winners are in a lottery?

>>252930
More, if then mean is higher, the environment damages your physiology to make your brain develop in particular ways, and if there were more whites in general

>>252812
>a sieve that is isn't perfect is the same that no sieve at all
For example fugly people usually have issues with their IQ and health too. Too much distance from reality only hurts you.

>>252204
Keep your woman in line.
No false idol will do the work for you.

>>252988
I want to lobotomize them and use for slave production the 1st instance of out of line stepping, but my race is simps, besides DNA and math doesn't lie

>>252927
But people like that also usually judge others after themselves, getting the wrong idea that others are nearly as smart as them. With disappointing results the long term.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand_Russell
Here have an example.

>>252999
He died at 97.

>>252999
You know the only reason we know anything about paleontology is because some guy in the 1700s was into coprophilia and spent all of this time studying coprolite?
It is autistic obsessions mixed with high intelligence, as well as a little psychopathy for institute challenging and rule breaking, the people who do it usually aren't pleasant or happy people

>>253002
You are implying that things hinge more on particular people than on the opportunity to have anyone in a particular situation. For example many groundbreaking inventions are not appearing out of thin air, but by combining several gimmicks from previously unrelated areas. 
If that guy wasn't there in the 1700s, then someone else would be there in the 1800s. The fossils didn't go anywhere, they stayed for the first guy to notice them.

>>253006
Meant here >>253003
sorry, headache

>>252841
I don't think it's a matter of unsophisticated, I think that religion played the central role here. It articulates a law that becomes sacred, which literally means above all else. Above your feelings, above facts, above observations, above any 'what if??'. And not respecting it means death.
There's no better way of enforcing values, everything else can be ((( relativised ))), ((( questionned ))), ((( argued about ))) and eventually subverted.

>>252765
>There's no winning with women
Sounds like loser cope to me.

>>252991
>lobotomize them and use for slave production the 1st instance of out of line stepping
Lobotomy and enslavement have both been tried and proved to have catastrophic results, only a retard would do that. Do you even know how to interact with other human beings ? Starts with that and build up from there.

>>253015
Obvious things don't need to be put into doctrine. They need positive working examples to follow and negative examples from history to serve as a warning. Making this into religion is a mistake, unless you manage to destroy enough information to hide it's fake from the start.

>>253006
>You are implying that things hinge more on particular people than on the opportunity to have anyone in a particular situation
Yes but they do need a foundational jumping off point and a stable society to survive. They push us forward, society keeps the progress and allows other great men to build even higher, and the longer shit takes, the more risk of losing it because it can't be part of the salvaged post collapse, then have to wait for things to get built again
>>253015
my type of slavery hasn't never been tried where I fuck with their genes and brains, and you try talking to whites about treating women proper, they'll get their fucking panties in a twist or go on about their experience

>>252999
I meant he was too optimistic about people in general.

>>253032
What are you predicting, stagnation or rapid collapse? Or something less clear-cut? Usually there is someone to pick the pieces a generation or a few later. Knowledge is more robust than culture, because it's easier to correct from malicious manipulation.

1747068966380-tegaki.png
[Hide] (9.9KB, 500x500) Reverse

>>253060
I think something like this will happen

>>253066
Who was I asking? That anon with the taste for crazy scientist stunts, not some cheap baiter. Feel free to hide the thread if it offends you.

>>253068
?
You were asking me, there also a possibility of a population leaving to make a byzantium, preserving the knowledge by making sure they are smart enough to understand, maintain, 
advance the knowledge. We could also all die tomorrow, leaving nothing

>>253080
I wanted a forecast from your understanding of history. Not a list of all possibilities, because they also contain "a meteorite hits Earth, killing all", which has no relation to the tendencies of existing human societies.

>>253093
And loss of knowledge usually means physical loss, not the record still intact, but becoming undecipherable instead. A clarification would be nice.

>>253101
I can't imagine how that loss might happen without some Fallout scenario with EMP frying electronics globewise. Slow decline gives enough time to save things important enough to save in some alternate way.

Even less conceivable is people dumbing down, Idiocracy-wise, to the required degree.

>>253093
Fall of Rome, but worse because we got higher them. A decline with things fucking up as it goes, with very important shit collapsing all at once in the end, with the more erudite groups saving what they can, hording it and basically becoming the church of the next society
>>253108
I can, they won't be smart enough to understand the information on the computers, or how to make energy for the computers, or how the computers work in order to fix the parts with the data on it. Also imagine the mean IQ is 60 and ethnic conflicts is making everyone destroy everything so the other groups can't use it

>>253138
Sixty? Isn't Somalian average 70? Why would it fall even more? With 70 as average there are 100 outliers possible, so "XXX for dummies" would still work.

>>253138
>>253144
Wasn't that gorilla in captivity, Koko, judged to be 60 or something?

>>253144
Not to mention that Somalia was hit with the double whammy of being niggers and inbred muslims at once.

>>253144
Things are selecting for low intelligence, the only threshold is when the population is too stupid to follow instructions and the artificial ecology maintaining that selection collapses