/tech/ - Technology

Technology & Computing

New Reply
Files Max 5 files32MB total
[New Reply]

fcf5bb975a01287786ea30e1ae55c5d994e2925f4275082de2c56f2e8613b54f.png (u)
[Hide] (105.1KB, 200x200)
According to this: https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/security-privacy-advice.html Linux is bad from security perspective, author advises you to use WIndows 10 in S mode, macOS or ChromeOS for more securit. Is it true or he is biased?
Replies: >>1695 >>1709 >>2953
>>1694 (OP) 
does this fool not know how a dll works
>Cover or remove any webcams or microphones
oh nvm hes clearly mentally disabled
>Stay away from desktop if you can and stick to mobile devices. 
>Some of these operating systems do have some privacy invasive telemetry but it can usually be disabled in the settings and verified with a network analyzer tool like Wireshark if you wish to be certain. 
>Use Signal, preferably with a burner or VoIP number. 
what the fuck am i reading
yeah, and you know what, this guy is involved in developing on Whonix and some other projects, because of this, people can believe this nonsense because he is "expert" or "authority"
>>1694 (OP) 
I took look at https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/security-privacy-advice.html and...
>muh iphone good
>muh apple good
>muh non-free good
>muh Windows S and ChromeOS good because more (((restrictions)))
>muh mobile devices are more secure
>muh verified boot 
<only works if you use your own key
> bit (((buttlocker))) 
<implying proprietary crypto is good
<implying bitlocker is not compromised
>Always update. 
<You also get the latest ciaware when you update your non-free OS
>muh telemetry can always be disable in your proprietary OS
>Disable WiFi and Bluetooth when not in use. 
<Still advocating proprietary software
<not a silver bullet but it's true that sandboxing should be used more often.
<also OpenBSD's pledge(2) & unveil(2), NetBSD's secmodel(9), FreeBSD's CAPSICUM(4) and DragonFlyBSD's VKERNEL(7) are worth looking into
>Do not give apps excessive permissions. 
<Still advocating Botnet 10

> Is it true
>or he is biased?
Not that either; he is just plain wrong in most of his points.
Replies: >>2024
Seems like a knowledgeable one and knews flaws of foss/linux stuff but they just happen to use that for a quality troll post.
From security standpoint, those official devices and official builds are good, but let's not forget security and privacy are different.
Sure there is backdoors everywhere which is a different matter and more likely for targeted deanonymization which even your experienced cryptographer or privacy expert might not even know about.
Modern motherboards and laptops have UEFI firmware and ring negative access through the programs in ring 3, everything is compromised.
Replies: >>2954
ad89f78ff07da108396c22e0b2a1894919756853b5a974b9d4708821fe1c7a4e.png (u)
[Hide] (134.7KB, 733x464)
>>1694 (OP) 
Madaidans is a cunt. He appears in every itoddler / brave / windows shilling thread on major imageboards. He doesn't deserve to be on the internet.
Replies: >>3028
>backdoors everywhere are not a security matter
Go back...
Did you upgrade to Veyndows 11 already?

9 replies | 2 files
Show Post Actions



- news - rules - faq -
jschan 0.1.5