According to this: https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/security-privacy-advice.html Linux is bad from security perspective, author advises you to use WIndows 10 in S mode, macOS or ChromeOS for more securit. Is it true or he is biased?
does this fool not know how a dll works
>Cover or remove any webcams or microphones
oh nvm hes clearly mentally disabled
>Stay away from desktop if you can and stick to mobile devices.
>Some of these operating systems do have some privacy invasive telemetry but it can usually be disabled in the settings and verified with a network analyzer tool like Wireshark if you wish to be certain.
>Use Signal, preferably with a burner or VoIP number.
what the fuck am i reading
yeah, and you know what, this guy is involved in developing on Whonix and some other projects, because of this, people can believe this nonsense because he is "expert" or "authority"
I took look at https://madaidans-insecurities.github.io/security-privacy-advice.html and...
>muh iphone good
>muh apple good
>muh non-free good
>muh Windows S and ChromeOS good because more (((restrictions)))
>muh mobile devices are more secure
>muh verified boot
<only works if you use your own key
> bit (((buttlocker)))
<implying proprietary crypto is good
<implying bitlocker is not compromised
<You also get the latest ciaware when you update your non-free OS
>muh telemetry can always be disable in your proprietary OS
>Disable WiFi and Bluetooth when not in use.
<Still advocating proprietary software
<not a silver bullet but it's true that sandboxing should be used more often.
<also OpenBSD's pledge(2) & unveil(2), NetBSD's secmodel(9), FreeBSD's CAPSICUM(4) and DragonFlyBSD's VKERNEL(7) are worth looking into
>Do not give apps excessive permissions.
<Still advocating Botnet 10
> Is it true
>or he is biased?
Not that either; he is just plain wrong in most of his points.