>>4224 (OP)
chatGPT isn't capable of understanding concepts in a way that matter to me, but when it comes to pure verbal tasks and finding the connection between things alongside the mood of the text, it's pretty capable. I don't have an interest in it besides that. As a conversation partner it feels more like a problem of finding the correct questions and wordings than it does an actual conversation, since it's insapient and just states whatever sounds reasonable. Picking apart its logic and trying to find where it may have gone wrong, and it will go wrong, is a bit fun. I've not played with any other chatbot.
If one pops up that's marginally smarter I can easily see myself spending most of my time talking to it.