>>105
Thank you for the response anon
good points, i disagree on some aspects, so i will mention those, but mostly i agree...
>Tyrannicide
Yes promoting violence is for glowies only. However, politicians having consequences and being scared is a good thing. Often regime change can be most easily accomplished by a leader dying or getting killed, altho the consequences are not guaranteed to be better or worse. Certainly when the US gets rid of a foreign dictator, they tend to install a worse one. End of the day, every government depends on the support of its people, no matter the structure.
>Debating glowies and bots on discord and /pol/
In general debating politics is a waste of time. Actions speak louder than words. Same goes for writing. If writing does not inspire action, its useless.
>Homeschooling
I agree that schooling is mostly tangential to liberty. However, disassociating from the state is always good. You can't expect your kids to be creative, and have any intelligence if you send them to public schools. They will get raped, bullied by the teachers, they will get pumped full of drugs if they dont listen. I think charters are better sure, but not as good as homeschooling, or no schooling at all... Rothbard did make this point about education not being the same as formal schooling, you get educated doing anything. Charter schools tend to be even more strict and more accountable to the government, thats the price they pay for being independent, and being state funded you should expect them to always be pro state. Traditional schooling is really bad for your kids anyways, my kids wont go to a school until they are 16 or so, and decide they want to for some reason. Worst case you can always get a tutor if your kid is interested in something you are not proficient in, and they cant self-study. Imo public school < charter < private < homeschooling < no schooling. Yes if your kid wants to be a doctor or lawyer, they will need to go to school as adults. Make sure they know the price tho.
>your child isn't your property
sure a kid is free to leave the household at any time. doesnt mean you cant bring up kids according to your own values. bringing up a kid with your values is much better than having a tranny state bureaucrat brainwash them. in general just dont give your kids to state agents.
>Underground militias
good but they often have retarded ideologies. also constantly infiltrated by glowies. idk i just dont see how they would achieve much. A violent secession would not work. If you want to secede, do so peacefully and make the parent state be the aggressor if they refuse to accept it. Then
>Gun proliferation
becomes important. This is based, ghost guns are good. But guns are not an end in themselves, they merely help keep the state at bay if a mass popular cause such as a state secession happens. I think guns for guns sake is a waste of time tho.
>Vote with ones feet
Yes this is in theory one of the best strategies when paired with secession, more on this later. However, simply moving to a random community and larping isnt very productive. Moving needs to be natural, people tend to naturally self-segregate into communities by race, religion etc. Thats why FSP is such a meme, it has not accomplished much. (also why NH over vermont, vermont has half the population so the movement wouldve been twice as influential)
>Cryptoanarchy
This is great, and the nature of the internet is inherently anti-copyright. Abolishing copyright is nice, and can be done from the comfort of your home. Also make sure you stay anonymous, try whonix or tails if you want an easy solution. What is needed is simple and normie friendly tech that is basically one click of a button, to access content for free. Imagine something that looks exactly like netflix or spotify, but free. Under the hood it needs to do lots to not get taken down, but the tech for that is out there (ipfs, torrent, i2p, etc). The biggest failure of almost all projects is not being normie friendly. For the average person, getting a vpn, going on torrent site, using qbittorrent and then using a video player to watch content, is 10000 harder than paying for netflix. If apps like this are made netflix, spotify, steam and so on, large parts of hollywood and corporate press would go bankrupt. That being said, this is a nice to have and a noble goal, but wont achieve liberty per se.
>Monero
Now as where copyright can be crippled with the use of software and the internet, monero is a lot more powerful, as it can be used to take over the banking system, and end inflation. There are some things in the way of this. Something not discussed at all from what ive seen is the arbitrary 0.6 xmr block reward. This value, and in general the rate of inflation of the whole network, is crucial to its ability to replace the global financial system. Im not smart enough to figure it out rn, and the average age of an austrian economist is deceased, hence they dont know what a monero is. So no one is really gonna figure it out unless i do. The issue, to put it briefly, is that the 0.6xmr is the total price per block for securing the network. Imagine if the whole world ran on monero, the price is hard set at roughly one 30-milionth of the whole economy, per two minutes (block time). On one hand this is very high, so much of the world resources get wasted on purpose on electricity. On the other hand it might be way too low, as that is the price in electricity, that it would cost a bad actor to overtake the network. The core issues stems from this being an arbitrary value, and not a market price. However this is not as easy to turn into a market price, because the 0.6 monero isnt transfered voluntarily from a payer, but is rather algorithmically guaranteed, and created out of thin air. Normal supply and demand dont apply. Praxeology needs to be extended to deal with this, this being essentially game theory, and Rothbard did say that game theory was one of the fields of praxeology, and he was right.
Anyhow enough schizo ramblings, building finance outside the government is always good. But dont fall for grifters, most crypto projects are terrible, including most big ones. Dont use bitcoin for obvious reasons. Also because monero is the only reasonable crypto at the moment, it is already used on dark net marketplaces. And using it for real purchases as opposed to a bunch of wanna get-rich-quick wagies and investors being the core of the demand, already makes it more stable than almost any crypto. Look at this for yourselves! Monero correlates with the us dollar better than most (all?) major cryptos. Another thing that im skeptical of is de-fi, i suspect a large chunk of it is ponzy schemes if youre smart enough to see thru it. The economic issue here is that the core of the financial system, banks in particular, is lending. And lending requires knowing the risk you take, and assigning credit to your lendee. This makes it inherently non-anonymous. That doesnt mean all loans must be public, but certainly all loans cannot be p2p anonymous. Only once economics and praxeology, as well as game theory, is well understood, can someone build defi properly.
>Accelerationism
this is low iq accelerationism, not the actual Landian idea. Basically, just like communism eventually will collapse, so will democratic socialism (liberalism). So therefore one strategy is to encourage and accelerate this process, encourage more government until it cant sustain itself anymore. This is meme-tier tho.
Whats not meme tier is encouraging polarization. Polarization is increasing fast, and thats a good thing, thats the only thing that can lead to
>Secession
you didnt mention this in your answer, sad :( this is not the same as voting with ones feet either. I think secession and national divorce is the best strategy by far, and a much more permanent one at that. But im too lazy to write more about this now, ill save it for next time.