/fascist/ - Surf The Kali Yuga

National Socialist and Third Position Discussion


New Reply
Name
×
Email
Message*
Files Max 5 files32MB total
Tegaki
Password
Flag
[New Reply]


d4be00b6783c2c721916c6543cb175bb3bffd3758c7d573b555433a21bd1ba32.jpg
[Hide] (276.8KB, 960x1197) Reverse
2de76ba49da2cbebdb34ebae0dd41f05b7d207ccd67048e88362ce85e05bc80f.jpg
[Hide] (94.3KB, 794x1059) Reverse
aa84d1543bd8a4d34f4eb3b07836f31b2475e4361c28e344c595057122f398df.jpg
[Hide] (21.5KB, 287x620) Reverse
bcaf9b10d84b5f21d0c623e52120711186a1dd5c4605b82e7e988628561da614.jpg
[Hide] (59.1KB, 1105x1000) Reverse
Jews have been funding, producing and disseminating pornography.
Entire generations of young people are exposed to pornography at a young age now and weigh everything remotely sexual on a scale of pornography.
The assault on beauty and erotic material and is so vile and wide that even the concept of eroticism is completely excised from the minds of hundreds of millions of young White males.
The least pornographic content is now called softcore pornography. But what is it exactly?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Softcore_pornography
>Softcore pornography or softcore porn is commercial still photography, film, imagery, or even audio that has a pornographic or erotic component but is less sexually graphic or intrusive than hardcore pornography, defined by a lack of sexual penetration or other sexual activity. It typically contains nude or semi-nude actors involved in suggestive poses or scenes, and is intended to be sexually arousing and aesthetically beautiful.
>The distinction between softcore pornography and erotic photography, or erotic art such as Vargas girl pin-ups, is largely a matter of debate. When the subject is naked, the image must be differentiated from nude art, and photos belong within the broader category of nude photography. 

If reading this kind of subversive garbage doesn't make your blood boil then you're a despicable normoid who's dead inside or some huge faggot.
I went looking for the lewdest of lewd paintings by Vargas, if there were any considering the very aggressive claim made by the article. There would be nothing pornographic because that wasn't the man's style. Period. If there is any I wonder what it must look like.
Today zoomers don't know anything about eroticism. They don't know the word itself and couldn't even point at erotic material even if their lives depended on it.
Everything is a shade of "porn."

Softcore pornography is a made up term for a made up category to sow confusion in our minds. Jews know that we intuitively hate pornography, it destroys us.

• Eroticism respects and enhances a woman's femininity and beauty.
• Pornography debases and desecrates the woman's body.

Even with the worst expression of eroticism you could never reach below what would come off as some embarrassing cheesecake, and that's it.
Replies: >>9683
>>9682 (OP) 
It sounds like you might be a coomer.
Replies: >>9685
Spoiler File
(67.5KB, 346x512) Reverse
Spoiler File
(69.4KB, 362x506) Reverse
Spoiler File
(69.4KB, 380x510) Reverse
Spoiler File
(65.8KB, 380x510) Reverse
Spoiler File
(65.8KB, 344x504) Reverse
Spoilers because tits and I don't know what the policy is there. That's really the most explicity material I could find yet, but I still fail to see where the tinge of pornography could be found in this.
>>9683
Found the circumcised faggot.
Replies: >>9688 >>9689
That one Goebbels speech regarding puritan outrage over some soap commercial comes to mind.
Replies: >>9690 >>9753
>>9685
>lack of self-control
strange flex but ok
Replies: >>9690
>>9685
Circumcised guys probably masturbate more because their dick heads constantly rub against their underwear. Also they can never be fully satisfied since their dicks are broken

But yeah porn is for faggots and so is "eroticism." Muslims are right to ban most displays of female nudity, though I'm not saying we should burn all these old paintings like ISIS would do
Replies: >>9692
6da1e9b79607f8fae6aa5729422810b098d60fc3d4b87b8582eb31eb54e1cd4e.jpg
[Hide] (82.1KB, 370x512) Reverse
e6eb328a99e79bb6a9c58237fe23819721b540049f40ef34fceee65fbd33c891.jpg
[Hide] (79.3KB, 344x514) Reverse
2f07b41fe8ce0b088763500038c88b8a49c1e210eaa483bf69aa8d66b2ff4855.jpg
[Hide] (117.1KB, 794x1118) Reverse
4e12bbe959579f860573070461fb97a6b2dd4b49ee47da87aeb1ea71d0533a6b.jpg
[Hide] (50.4KB, 520x879) Reverse
>>9687
Feminists are the barking dogs used for this. As per their usual contradictory stance, they're first and foremost the beachhead of anything anti-male and anti-family and these screaming incestuous harpies are used to silence men and bury them under mountains of guilt for even daring objectifying women.
The rise of a prude society could be round the corner and the convenient shoving of eroticism into a category of pornography would certainly help there. After all, on top of being accused of defending man spreading and the male gaze, if you were to defend that thing they decided to call "soft pornography" we'd be pornography apologists, or the other choice we'd have would be to adopt a wholesale rejection of nudity. A total false dilemma. That's another angle to the attack on beauty we already see now in movies, games and shows with the use of ugly females with potato heads who are missing some genes. They neuter lust, they reroute our carnal desires through pornography, and they forbid us from enjoying the spectacle of desirable feminine bodies or simply adoring the sight of the nakedmost sacred motherhood. 
>>9688
>passive aggressive silliness
Why are you so easily triggered? Is the idealization of the White woman's beauty ((( rubbing ))) you the wrong way?
>>9689
>But yeah porn is for faggots and so is "eroticism." Muslims are right to ban most displays of female nudity, though I'm not saying we should burn all these old paintings like ISIS would do
The state of this board, now invaded by would be low IQ sandwiggas.

>36th Precept
>Sexual pornography degrades the Nature of all who are involved. A beautiful nude woman is art; a camera between her knees to explore her private parts is pornography.
'“Because The Beauty Of The White Aryan Woman Must Not Perish From The Earth”'
Looking back throughout the years I can't help but make the sad observation that there's way too many self-avowed free-thinking right-wingers* who hold an embarrassingly unthinking and counterproductively superstitious attitude on the topic of pornography. Yes, we can all agree it's repulsive and obscene on a conceptual level. Yes, it's a societal evil. Yes, it has proven deleterious effects on the human psyche down to the physiological level when consumed continuously in the long term. Yes, it's abhorrent for children to be exposed of it, due to the negative effects it will have in their development. Those are objective facts, none of them are in doubt.

Tragically however, it is often the case that opposition to pornography is borne of knee-jerk reactions, of repeated soundbytes and slogans rather than a proper understanding of its causes and consequences. All too often in so-called right-wing circles, even forward-thinking fascist spaces, people treat pornography as a sort of boogeyman, a spooky mind virus that will instantly corrupt your mind like it's possessed by denizens from Dante's Inferno. It's treated as a disease itself, when in reality it's mostly a vector, and in many ways it'd be more accurate to say it's a symptom of societal decay.

I think this knee-jerk opposition to anything with the slightest hint of eroticism stems from that place of superstition. See, in a healthy society there would be no need to have a hypothetical culture police prosecute pimps and pornographers, let alone have a dedicated anti-porn task force. In a healthy society boys and girls would simply approach each other, play at romance, fall in love, have sex, the whole nines. Pornography and prostitution wouldn't disappear (there'll always be a niche for it, given the nature of human vice) but they'd be relegated to the fringes of society, something shameful to do away from prying eyes, for which legal punishment would be an afterthought because the real punishment would be the shame of being caught in the act. It's precisely because we live in a society that has bastardized and commodified every minute aspect of human interaction down to sexual intimacy that pornography, parasociality and other similar ills flourish. It's because we live in a crapulent social order with no real morals or values besides endless solipsistic self-indulgement that sexual degeneracy is as rampant as it is. Just as the jews can only thrive in the swamps of our sins, degeneracy can only exist in a rotten, desensualized, commodified, consumerist dystopia like ours.

Bottom line: don't make a mountain of a molehill, focus on the real enemy. Shoot porn studio tycoons, behead pimps, bomb Mindgeek offices. Don't waste your time doodling bras over nude paintings and putting blankets on topless statues.

*I despise the false left-right dichotomy, but I'll use it here for simplicity's sake.
Replies: >>9699
>>9697
>It's treated as a disease itself, when in reality it's mostly a vector, and in many ways it'd be more accurate to say it's a symptom of societal decay.
This decay is nothing natural, it's engineered. Pornography is both disease and vector for further destruction. It's gangrene and calls for more of it.
Replies: >>9704
Spoiler File
(170.7KB, 800x1059) Reverse
Softcore pornography.
>>9699
Please try reading a post before you reply to it.
Replies: >>9705
6c9b39b5408700e8d340b081783d0c334ebb47a1001752ef7130100a477f08cc.png
[Hide] (95KB, 391x462) Reverse
>>9704
Now you're bleeding from the slit because I didn't quote your entire lecture and merely mildly disagreed with a single line of yours?
Peak fragility right there.
IMG_0315.jpeg
[Hide] (74.9KB, 327x400) Reverse
>>9687
As always, Great wisdom from the Dr himself.
From “Morality over Moralism “ - Dr. Goebbels
“An example. In a major central German city an advertising poster for a soap company showed a fresh, attractive girl holding the soap package in her hands. A moral knight who unfortunately had the right to determine the fate of this poster forbade its distribution on the ground that it offended the moral sensibilities of the population, since the woman in the poster was holding the soap in a place “that for moral reasons cannot be described more precisely.”

What is moral about this? The person announcing the ban, who presumes that other people share his dirty fantasies, or the German people and the National Socialist movement, that are rightly upset and in opposition to such a ridiculous action?”
“ Save us from these hypocritical creatures who have no genuine strong conception of life, and who in reality preach no honest morality. They generally are life’s losers, protesting life itself. Eternal life and its laws will hardly make way for them; at most, they will hide behind a screen of contemptible hypocrisy and dishonest prudery.“
“ Have these moral trumpeters any idea how they slander and demoralize millions of German women with their preaching, women who bravely and honestly do their duty in life and on the job, who are good comrades to their men and sacrificing mothers for their children?”
“ We do not want to abolish pleasure, but rather to let as many as possible share in it. That is why we encourage people to attend the theater, that is why we give workers the opportunity to dress well for festive occasions. That is the reason behind Kraft durch Freude. That is why we shake off the agents of a prudish hypocrisy, why we do not allow decent, hard-working people who have every reason to need relief from their hard daily labors, who need to reaffirm life, to recover from the weariness, cares, and burdens of every day, to have their necessary pleasures ruined by the eternal chicanery of these pedants.

We need more affirmation of life and less complaining! More morality, but less moralism!“
Replies: >>9755
f52539625cded218da09cef814248c3f301db91f9d69de9b4033207295ea6e6f.gif
[Hide] (5.8MB, 500x334) Reverse
>>9753
Great quotations.
>>life’s losers, protesting life itself
>>eternal chicanery of these pedants
>>moral knight
>literally encapsulating the white knight, simp lord, intellectual weakling, virtue signaling faggot and social justice warrior cancers three generations ago
Man, they already had all them bases covered, didn't they? We're really small fry.
I can barely imagine the universal epic roastings Goebbels would drop today if he had access to social networks.
[New Reply]
16 replies | 17 files | 9 UIDs
Connecting...
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

Select the solid/filled icons
- news - rules - faq -
jschan 1.4.1