This may be uncomfortable for some people.
I do not see many reasons to expect that a complete fascist victory ends in a Man of the High Castle type society in the long term. I've often pondered what an isolated fascist nation would be like and concluded that, without the threat of impending attack, it would be pretty chill and folkish.
Many fascists are righteously furious at what is being done to us by the jews. In the context of a world ruled almost entirely by genocidal jewish oligarchs, it is natural and good that fascists are militant.
What would a fascist nation look like? At first, no doubt it would be militant, armed, and prepared to wage nuclear war to survive. But what would a fascist nation post-victory look like?
Many imagine military marches everywhere, all the time, everyone in the military, the military is central to the thoughts and minds of all. Uniforms, guns, Panzers, and a dictator in a uniform who wears lots of medals and accolades. Some even say it'll be like Warhammer 40k, which is pretty cringe in my opinion.
I don't believe this is realistic or desirable:
1. Jews are not going to hand us power. We will need to take it by force. This means that, by the end of a potentially 50 year struggle, much of the wealth of my country and many other White nations will be destroyed. Running a militarized state is extremely expensive as an army is essentially dead weight and the more men you remove from society, the less productive your economy will be. I am all for prioritizing culture over GDP, but this doesn't exactly create culture either. Therefore, once all enemies are defeated, there will be a strong impetus for the new fascist government to demobilize and get men back into the new economy.
2. The only justification for maintaining a huge army post Revolution will be enemies. Say that the jews are dead and we Ethno-globe the niggers and Asians. Now what? We could turn on each other and wipe out life, if that is indeed our goal. But it isn't mine and I doubt that most White nationalists want to prove the jews right by immediately turning on each other the second they're gone. Combating communism will be extremely easy without jews and mass media run by jews. Communism has no appeal to anyone, especially working class White men. It exists solely because of mass media and jews, and even so, marxists are just anti-racist liberals these days, not genuine economic marxists. Even if there was some ideological foe we had to combat, doing so would not require uniforms and tanks, but social media and surveillance technology.
Once the enemy is gone, what is the objective? For me, I just want to live in a community that is not being flooded with niggers. I'd also like to celebrate and grow Anglo-Germanic culture in America again, as capitalism smothered our natural development and made us vulnerable to jewish subversion. Folk culture has been wiped out for most western nations and I would like to try again as if the past 300 years didn't happen. Obviously, I'm not overly concerned with making sure America creates a global empire. Perhaps others are more interested in this. To them I would ask: Yes, but why? What is the long term purpose? Is it spreading our currently non-existent culture? Is it populating the world with "Americans?" What if your own people do not want this? Who are you doing this for?
What would the government be like?
Obviously, many would like a totalitarian dictatorship no judgement passed. I'll take a White dictator over a jewish democrat any day That works well in times of war but isn't as effective in times of peace. People throughout history favor more localized rule. Once the enemy is destroyed, there is no more justification for a military state. Perhaps the initial Revolutionaries would attempt to set up a dictatorship that would last forever. The problem is that dictatorships are very bad at lasting forever. A monarchy would work better, but also seems very LARPy. Even if a single-party state or a monarchy was established, each death would weaken the grip of the ruling regime and gradually, it would inevitably become more pluralistic. If that offends you, consider what happens when a Great Leader dies. No one man can fill his boots so at the very worst, an oligarchy is established. Presto, you just reduced the dictatorship to an agreement of oligarchs, an embryonic democracy. Keep eating away at the power structure and eventually, you either get a bunch of tiny oligarchies or you just get a democraty-republicy type of government.
Or, perhaps, you could design the system to break up into a bloody civil war every time the leader died, but this goes back to point 2. I am not interested in creating a hellscape that makes people wish for the jews back.
If you really want to help out marxism, you would want to create a fascist dictatorship designed to appear to oppress the people so that the people would gravitate towards any alternative, even if that is marxism. And eventually, people like us would push back against the system and eventually talk about what I am talking about: Revolution. Maybe they would be crushed. But eventually, if the people feel no loyalty to the system, it will collapse. That's what we are trying to do to the jews.
If you design a system to break apart into a civil war every 30 years, you also guarantee that your system is replaced by a more reasonable one. No one wants to live like that.
I'd like fascism to last 1,000 years after the jews are defeated. I do not want it to fall apart into civil war and counter-revolution upon my death.