/fascist/ - Surf The Kali Yuga

National Socialist and Third Position Discussion


New Reply
Name
×
Email
Message*
Files Max 5 files32MB total
Tegaki
Password
Flag
[New Reply]


NEW >>>/a/ REPEAT REPEAT NEW >>>/a/

Regarding recent events: >>>/meta/4978 

There is a new QTDDTOT >>6079


Jose_Antonio_Primo_de_Rivera-1625005208.jpg
[Hide] (200.1KB, 510x799) Reverse
Let's get this started with the troublesome figure of Franco.
https://x.com/BorealBaron/status/1670935327878311936
>I read this same take about Saint Francisco Franco again and again, and I have to say that this amounts to a complete whitewashing of the revolutionary aims of the Spanish left and the success of Franco's counter-revolution. Let me explain
>Franco stopped a genocide of "conservative" people (just normal people who went to church or were resented by their leftist neighbors for whatever reason) that would have come as a result of the inevitable sovietization of Spain; hundreds of churches were destroyed by the left…
>…because they were seen as symbols of "reactionary thought," and around 70,000 were annihilated during their revolutionary terror. The anarchists ruled in catalonia and many other places (yes, we Spaniards are the only ones to take that ridiculous meme ideology seriously) and they didn't rule over the Catalan Parliament because their retard ideology forbade them from participating in electoral politics. They executed people at will—around 8,000 just in 1936—including many in the catalan nationalist right (something that has been completely…
>…erased from history by catalan nationalists because they ally with the left), burning their bodies in the infamous Asland factory, or throwing them into mass graves that are still being unearthed. As for the commies, the spanish "democratic republic" had NKVD agents like Alexander Orlov making killing lists and freely running chekas on spanish soil. Very democratic to have a foreign spy in charge of security...
>The Spanish Republic was WORSE than Weimar; the left didn't  think that the right had any legitimacy to exist, even when they convincingly won the elections in 1933. In 1934, they instigated the Asturias Revolution to cause chaos and anarchy; it was anarcho-tyranny all the way…
>…down, and there was nobody on the political stage that seemed like it could alter this trajectory. Not that they wanted to; President Azaña (a fat malding imbecile) famously said, "All the convents in Spain are not worth a single Republican life". And the political leadership on the right were also fat idiots with no ideas of their own. Also, in contrast to the german case, the right didn't have militias or any way to protect them from left-wing violence.
a0feeb6375c6626f55dae17ba444b804a1eaba1190a56b36838f28cc81aca6a8.jpg
[Hide] (114.3KB, 616x865) Reverse
JoseAntonioFEJONS.jpg
[Hide] (245.1KB, 707x906) Reverse
8481664f5a6f48ee79e6985e660e058c83846e548e42b69707f15cf5b383c904.jpg
[Hide] (103.3KB, 906x1280) Reverse
1cc5aba7b859a718d48a66d0ccd165ee49013cd82ae8fc2a896a568f25e16b6a.jpg
[Hide] (26.9KB, 657x369) Reverse
a7d1ff380b30033a00c73964e95e2578a47efd3eee9b986b34e1c50209d414f4.jpg
[Hide] (95.6KB, 1034x728) Reverse
>Primo de Rivera, the man who many revisionists see as "betrayed" by Franco, was able to get just one seat in parliament in 34, and his party didn't have enough muscle that could be compared to the freikorps or the SA.
>He was just a bourgeois kid ripping off italian fascism who was killed because the left were insane and paranoid about a fascist takeover. And despite all of this, Franco won an insurrectionary war against all odds and ruled for 40 years, but because Spain joined NATO and became a "democracy" after his death, that means he "lost" and nobody was saved from the left?
>We spaniards have a good climate; we love living well and sharing our lifestyle with others. We are not some north koreans who can live like drones in a permanent autarchic state. In the end the US-USSR coalition winning the war wasn't Franco's fault. But this doesn't stop some revisionist from claiming that Franco was a dummie for not joining Hitler's effort. Once Germany lost and Truman the rat was out of the picture…
>…Franco was perfectly reasonable in approaching Eisenhower. Franco was a very pragmatic leader, and that was his strongest virtue. He showed this when he united the carlists with the falangists, two factions with completely different conceptions of the state.
>And, most importantly, claiming that spain becoming a democracy is a "poetic win" for the spanish left is delusional. The spanish left isn't happy at all about losing the war and having a monarch (I am a right wing republican BTW) …
>…to remind them about this fact every day of their lives, among MANY OTHER more important things...in fact, I would claim that if Spain exists today, it is because of Franco, as the 1930s was probably the last time when catalonia and the basque country…
>…could have become independent nations with the support of foreign powers. During the Francoist era, the economy was integrated, and internal migrations happened that articulated spain in a way that greatly damaged the leftist project.
>This undermined the leftist separatist project and is the biggest source of secessionist resentment to this day.
>People from outside Spain just don't understand how sectarian Spain is. The only thing that prevents terrorist ETA members from having streets and monuments to their name all over Spain in 2023 is the fact they killed some moderate leftists.
>The Spanish left always wanted a revolution and mass killings of "fachas" (fascists), not "democracy", NATO or whatever.
>So no, Saint Francisco Franco didn't lose; in fact, he is the most successful counterrevolutionary of the XXth century and probably of all time. He won and saved the good people of Spain from marxist massacres, and few leaders in history have been able to achieve this.
The independantists were full to the gills of international communists. It's precisely on that fault line that they split, one side wanting to go the Trotskyist route, the other wondering what the hell this had to do with their own real femto-national revolt.

We wouldn't be having this stupid discussion if Franco had engaged all his forces with the Axis instead of trying to play all the angles as the hard conservative scheming opportunist he was.
90b1d2c130e56b762f81a150adc618164642a3538471429c234a8bbc209ac04a.jpg
[Hide] (121.7KB, 691x900) Reverse
e16f33227b0ae0642e7d8de849e85a99b4b3a0318de1d1671888cecca02f70de.jpg
[Hide] (223.4KB, 1024x662) Reverse
e48456f44197b87fd5afe614b191d4020d13f46a2d5db3d7e44ae0c347571dd0.jpg
[Hide] (50.2KB, 787x541) Reverse
The only reason for Franco's acceptance by the USA was because it was far more practical to keep this hardline conservative in place as long as they played him on the basis of his anti-communist engagement.
But José Antonio Primo de Rivera was the real man, a man Spain wasn't ready for.
falangism, and franco, or whatever, were so underwhelming and unnoteworthy. these were boomer ancestors to nowadays' xitter tradcath groyper nationalists. so goddamn uninteresting, just some lazy siesta-addled rightist intellecualite war of attrition against Reds, and then somehow this boring dinosaur became Kim Sung Gook Martínez or something. and then he croaked and didn't even leave a successor lmao. just a few decades of isolationist pope-fellating.

the worst part about franco is how ABHORRENT the uniforms are. ¿was he like totalmente ciego o algo así? oh my fucking god. so much UGLINESS. what misery to be reminded this slimy spanish sloth existed. this blemish had nothing to do with our Fascism.
Replies: >>8811
>>8771
It's a mutt catholic country. No surprise it went nowhere. It should be conquered again by norfs and all the dubious genetic creatures be removed.
[New Reply]
4 replies | 9 files | 3 UIDs
Connecting...
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

Select the solid/filled icons
- news - rules - faq -
jschan 1.4.1