>>2614
>You're retarded; "gender" is a dumb term meant to delude everyone into thinking the concepts of sex and sexuality are "fluid" as far as categorization. This way, transexuality and homosexuality can be seen as legitimate.
Gender as a word wasn't coined in 1970 by John Money, he coined Gender theory out of Marxist theory, and sought to test his theory on David(Bruce) Reimer and his brother Brian, he reported it as a success, meanwhile poor David had realized he wasn't a girl at around puberty, and was living as close to his natural self as possible by fifteen and spent the entirety of the rest of his life fighting against Money and his theories until he killed himself at 38 yrs old, the experiment was a failure in that it disproved moneys entire theory yet it still survives and has turned into what we see today, He took the Formal version of the word Sex which is the word Gender and was still Gender at the time and warped it as jews tend to do
>Today, most people just see the word gender as a synonym for sex.
It's not only a synonym, it is the formal, more polite version of the word sex and it was considered so until VERY RECENTLY, this is the reason Gender and sex were interchangeable and used as such on government documents, here you gave the jews ground implicitly, denying use of a word because of how they've warped it instead of using it brazenly as it's original natural form, by refusing to use the word you implicitly admit they are correct and therefore lose ground and destroy your own culture just to avoid their warping of a word.
>No, the word was only reported to have been first used by Trotsky in "The Peculiarities of Russia's Development in The History of the Russian Revolution", and it was used as a response to National Socialism.
IN ENGLISH, IT WAS A FRENCHY WORD PRIOR SEPCIFICALLY Raciste accent on the e, and it had none of the negative connotation that trotsky and his ideological descendants used it for and turned it into.
https://web.archive.org/web/20190827005539/http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com/2012/10/on-unclear-origin-of-word-racist.html
excerpt from the above article:
A piece for National Public Radio (Gene Demby, "The Ugly, Fascinating History of the Word 'Racism'," 6 January 2014) cites the Oxford English Dictionary to the effect that the first use of the word racism (in English) was by Richard Pratt in 1902, five years after Malato's use of raciste and racisme in French.
The truth matters and pointing to commies for using our language derogitorily when a word is inherently neutral or simply descriptive is fine but don't give them any credit for creating a word unless they actually fucking did.
>You and Anon are talking about whole other forms of grooming.
Both are called grooming whether you want to make up other words or say it more eloquently or not, and well established male, was intentional. Most arranged marriages did not care for trustworthiness over the ability of the prospective groom to provide for the bride, it was the most important factor, not trust, not care, not happiness, and not flowery notions of "love".
>Anon is clearly referring to modern grooming,
No shit, I totally missed that(not) instead of grasping that and pointing him to a use case that, though rare today, still exists, just because degeneracy is common place doesn't take away from the original use of a word again here's you and that anon giving ground because jews and degenerates warped the meaning of a word to excuse themselves.
>Most of these studies do not count or do full case research on actual reports of sexual abuse done by sodomites.
The specific study that gave the 16 to 33% was a meta analysis, which are usually less politically motivated than your average study in and of itself and the Cdc puts the average for both sexes at about 14 to 15%, so on the low end it's barely higher than normal high end it's more than double, realistically probably about 1.5 times, so say 24% of a tiny proportion of the population who would have more volatile home situations due to the repulsion for this behavior most parents inherently feel, which can and probably does cause some psychological abuse to occur. Which again just points to unstable family situations as the impetus for this form of degeneracy, at no point does any of this point to any other cause molestation is not one of them, there is overlap but not enough to point towards it as a cause. I've seen more evidence that seems to lend towards homosexuality, of which trannies are supposed to be a subset, not being caused by molestation either there is overlap but evidence dictates that it is more likely both an exceedingly rare natural mental aberration and a symptom of parasitic infection(literal parasite, not the jews).
>I wish idiots like you would do better research instead of trying to unironically defend trannies
Who's defending trannies faggot?, pointing out idiocy and illogical conclusions, and inaccurate information, that you fucking "We're right wing" niggers seem to love spreading around, instead of using the actual information(which isn't even hard to find) to make a cohesive coherent statement and conclusion, you peddle lies and bullshit tying to pull at the moral cords that most in our society either do not have or do not care to enforce.
>What is Jeffrey Epstein?...
Two dead jews, One a confirmed mossad spy and embezzler, the next a pimp and possible mossad spy and One living imprisoned jew hollywood movie producer who propositioned mostly jewish whores to provide roles in movies in exchange for sexual favors, most of whom only came out after he was charged with a crime lending no credibilty to their stories you got some kind of point here? none of them have any part in trans shit, or molestation, more prostitution, and blackmail, and white collar crime.
The Schizo shit about Epstein not withstanding, I have seen many claimed things to be evidence he was trafficking in and killing much younger girls than those he used for the blackamil prostitution ring, but hard evidence is lacking, and ultimately a waste of time to even dig anyone further sullied by such supposed evidence is already on my shitlist,
>>2615
You do realize they're like 4 percent of the population now and that's not a much higher rate than the general molestation rate, right? The only one larping here is you, that was not a defense of trannies that was me, a National Socialist excoritaing a retard for inaccurate information, if you want to fight this shit you have to do it with the truth, not made upo bullshit.