/fascist/ - Surf The Kali Yuga

National Socialist and Third Position Discussion


New Reply
Name
×
Email
Message*
Files Max 5 files32MB total
Tegaki
Password
Flag
[New Reply]


NEW >>>/a/ REPEAT REPEAT NEW >>>/a/

Regarding recent events: >>>/meta/4978 

There is a new QTDDTOT >>6079


e5cb42c97111af85a3edd86cb89ebee422dff36d0a518c89ecbaf5ae36f3b726.png
[Hide] (41.2KB, 1000x600) Reverse
8927054c72ef5a1e422f8686d76744bab99d1d576cb9b6335711de2c47d4287d.jpg
[Hide] (352.2KB, 1200x630) Reverse
72349d54038180f19153593eeb49da1eeaddb877e2b25d9d486c39504bc27e1f.png
[Hide] (267.1KB, 1200x960) Reverse
I would have opened this thread on a rather bland description of Ecofascism and a presentation of a few key works by Fascists who put a greater emphasis in their struggle on the protection of the environment. However I decided to open this thread for a whole other reason, to expose a subversive attempt by our enemies to shove us into the side of the alarmist global cabal that pushes the 'Climate Change' dogma.
We must not let that go unnoticed. The jewish system is creating a whole new false narrative that recycles its older distorted definition of Fascism which was used equally by the marxists, the left at large, the liberals and conservative before World War 2, now to encase it into a supposedly new ideological frame of misplaced favoritism that puts the protection of the environment at the expense of man.
They call it Ecofascism but it has nothing to do with what we true Fascists know as such.

>“Very often, if you have somebody on the far right become an environmentalist, [their ideology] slots itself into a hypernationalist, white supremacist worldview, so it fuels the calls to harden borders at the softer end, [and] at the harder end, it can express itself through the idea that climate change is a divine purging,” Klein, author of The Shock Doctrine and This Changes Everything, told Teen Vogue.
>“[Eco-fascism] argues [climate change] is God’s will, that there are too many people anyway, so there’s going to be a great purge and perhaps that’s all for the best. It’s environmentalism through genocide.”
https://www.teenvogue.com/story/what-is-ecofascism-explainer
The second part comes out of nowhere and is nothing short of a total lie by this jewess. I have never seen any fascist present himself as accepting of the formerly known 'Global Warming' and now all encompassing 'Climate Change' narrative, even less declare that this was some kind of divine retribution. On the contrary the raedical right holds the highest concentration of people called "climate deniers" which in itself is an incorrect term precisly used by the medias on purpose to ridicule fascists; it's meant to make us sound like brainlets who deny the climate's evolution like we would deny that the sky is blue, that water is wet and the Earth is round.
This Klein whore describes us as caring about any carbon footprint and even goes on to cite texts that although they did contain a shared concern for the environment, nevertheless didn't care at all about the climate's fluctuations.
What we oppose is the blame put on humans, we reject the guilt.
So we see that just as with the subversive creation of National Bolshevism, our enemies are trying to create another false ideology that we supposedly espouse.
>Klein explained that the messaging behind viral videos of wild animals reentering environments — such as doctored videos of dolphins swimming in Venetian canals — can lead to a dangerous narrative insinuating “humans are the virus,” setting a tone of genocidal language.
Only the globalists and assorted transhumanists have intellectually held the view that humans at large are the virus.
>“This is time to be really vigilant about any idea that this pandemic is weeding out people who needed to be weeded out anyway,” added Klein. “These are fascist logistics.”
Ecofascists are also vaxxers who once again accepted the Covid narrative and thought it was a net gain for the population. This is strawman after strawman. And moving on to Moore...
>Additionally, Moore encouraged teens to identify eco-fascist arguments by asking what solutions are being proposed to combat climate change.
>“Does it include excluding people or pushing people out, or more military, or more policing, or more surveillance?” she asked. “Does it involve closing borders and denying people the ability to flee to safety or stay in their homes?”
What a surprise. The heinous parasitism and tyranny Whites are exposed to in their own countries is identified as green fascism.
>Once we can identify eco-fascism, we can not only start to understand what’s really causing climate change, but also move toward practical, effective solutions that include all of our communities.
And now Eco-fascists are also pretending fighting Climate Change but only to grab more power and remove migrants. Huh, maybe we should? But that would require us dabbling in copious amounts of mind-wrecking and anti-Aryan perjury by bowing to the anti-White enemy who organizes our destruction precisely on the excuse of fighting against the destruction of the world because muh +1°.

Wikipedia relies entirely on conservative and marxist definitions of fascism:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecofascism
>>ECOFASCISM // or how Fascism co-opted Climate Change
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MYUrUj26nU
Fascism never co-opted the narrative grown in the sick minds of the Davos faggots and WEF tyrants. Only leftists relying on a mischievious definition of fascism could come up with such a falsity.
More nonsense to follow:
https://2ser.com/the-rise-of-ecofascism-part-two/
>When a government uses a threat to the environment to justify autocratic rule and the removal of rights, we call it eco-fascism. Attaining net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2025 would be easy if we imposed authoritarian rule.
https://extinctionrebellion.uk/2020/01/01/eco-fascism-the-threat-is-real/
Replies: >>6109 >>6160
>>6106 (OP) 
>>“[Eco-fascism] argues [climate change] is God’s will, that there are too many people anyway, so there’s going to be a great purge and perhaps that’s all for the best. It’s environmentalism through genocide.”
>The second part comes out of nowhere and is nothing short of a total lie by this jewess.
That’s hilarious
I predict a forthcoming hard subversive push, the kind of which was performed successfully against Atomwaffen Division via the Tempel ov blood, against post-Terrorgram accelerationism, with exactly this kind of butchered “climate change” rhetoric, to paint us as Facebook fools throwing sham “environmentalism” into our “white supremacist” ideology because “we’re concerned about the cow burps heating up the planet” allowing the victorious kike to laugh at the strawman for reasons such as “the climate emergency affecting the global majority (new subversive term for non-whites) more than the global minority”.
If voting wasn't a thing, kikes would not gain anything from these elaborate lies. The people dumb enough to believe this crap are useless in a real army. Without voting, defeatist fatasses would be of little help to the kikes.
>>6106 (OP) 
You are wrong. Klein successfully explained our way of seeing things with this quote:
>>Klein explained that the messaging behind viral videos of wild animals reentering environments — such as doctored videos of dolphins swimming in Venetian canals — can lead to a dangerous narrative insinuating “humans are the virus,” setting a tone of genocidal language.
"humans are the virus". Yes they are. Most of them, except a tiny minority. And if you disagree you are not a National Socialist. Mass scale genocide is the only way forward in this world of eternal struggle.
We have to win the global race war, not only for or survival, but also because if we loose, the lower races, having learned our technology, will destroy this planet to satisfy their hedonistic urges, putting an end to all life.
Replies: >>6163 >>6180
>>6160
the problem is there needs to be a very clear distinction between cringy o9a school shooter misanthropy and TOTAL NON-WHITE (and for that matter, ALL undesirable or defective “white”) DEATH.
It may seem like a minor pedantry but it’s not in reality.
We absolutely need to solidify our stance on genocide of all browns.
Any pathetic opportunistic coward faggot whining about muh dead Palesandnigger babies gets hung on the same gallows.
Replies: >>6184
>>6160
>u not ns!!
I don't know what you're smoking, National Socialism wasn't into world wide genocides.
Replies: >>6198
>>6163
Talk about putting the cart before the horse!
We don't even control a single square kilometer of land in our own nations and we're already announcing that we want global genocide?
At this point, we don't have a horse or a cart or even a road or a farm. 

You're never going to get a 100% agreement on anything because this is the internet.
And for the record, I do not care if our struggle leads to wiping out all of non-Whites or not. At this point, I am not sure I will even see a White homeland in my lifetime. But getting upset at people for not trumpeting our plan to wipe out all non-Whites in their own countries is just ridiculous. What a pointless non-issue.
Replies: >>6198
>>6180
>National Socialism wasn't into world wide genocides.
Let's see what Himmler, the Archpriest of NS, has to say about this:
<This Reich will be a truly holy myth: the peacekeeping power in Europe, the leading people of the overall Germanic Reich. And that will be drawn up after the war. It will gradually be united; this Germanic Reich will impress its stamp upon Europe, will lead the white race in Europe, and prepare it for the great racial struggles which surely – we won't be around to see it – will be fought out between the continents within a few generations
Truly beautifully put. The man was a visionary.

>>6184
Do you take into account the millions of animals that are skinned alive in Chinese factories? The priceless fauna of Africa completely destroyed by negro poachers? The numerous species driven to extinction by the Chinese's superstitions? The poisoning of oceans by tons of plastics that are dumped there after having been used to satisfy the base pleasures of the subhumans?
This technology, our technology, is a very dangerous thing. We foolishly gave it to the other races, and we must take responsibility for this. Without these technologies, most of the world will not be able to feed itself. A mass genocide is necessary to restore proper balance.
Replies: >>6199 >>6202
>>6198
Not sure if you're disagreeing with me because I'm not reading anything in Himmler's words that he was wishing for world wide genocides, only acknowledging that there would be racial tensions between superpowers.
Replies: >>6200
>>6199
I am disagreeing with you. We're talking about Himmler here, if you're not familiar with his speeches, he always likes to use euphemisms for these things. Once he called the extermination of the Jews in Europe "A matter of cleanliness".
When he says "racial struggles", it's not about vague "tensions", it's about an all out-war to total annihilation.
Another extract from the same speech
<Many people ask how much longer the war will last. Many people believe that this or that could have been done in a simpler way, or better or more quickly. Sometimes we forget that we are in the midst of one of the most gigantic national conflicts, in one of the most gigantic racial struggles for many centuries.

I notice you didn't respond to my arguments about why exterminationism is necessary, from an ecofascist point of view (which was the purpose of this thread in the first place). Do you really think the Chinese will stop destroying the Earth if we ask them gently?
Replies: >>6212 >>6374
>>6190
Whether you or I like it or hate it, the majority of White nationalists, nevermind potential White nationalists who aren't there yet, find prancing around talking about global genocide to be crass. I personally find it cringe since you're essentially just roleplaying on the Titanic as it sinks when we should be getting lifeboats ready to survive.
The other irony is that you're basically just agreeing with jews that Nazis are genocidal killers who will wipe out everyone the moment we get power. 
btw, would I be incorrect that Slavs also fall on your list of undesirable to exterminate?

>>6198
I love cats and dogs and trees but I'm staring extinction in the face. I do not have the energy to get upset over what Chinese do in China.
Replies: >>6207 >>6208
>>6190
>bro is from ohio💀
What is up ith the surge of nigger lingo here?
Replies: >>6416
>>6202
>White nationalistd
uh, yeah, those guys are pretty much all cowards and losers like Spic Fuentes that I at least want nothing to do with and have nothing in common with.
Even more pathetic is you thinking it’s ironic that kikes have something right about me. Are you just a contraryan ETLB ‘tard that thinks whatever kikes don’t think you do to heckin’ own the heckin’ racist Jewish supremacists o algo?
Replies: >>6307
>>6202
>slavs
I have no clue what spurred you to bring this random contentious issue up but it’s probably related to your aimless contrarianism and need to D&C so people don’t call you out on your bullshit/cowardice/anxious attempts to whip the ball of subcutaneous fat that you can sink into and not be observed in known as “white nationalists”.
But I think us extermenationists have a consensus that Uralics with a plausible central Asian admixture are a problem while literal Homo Erectus negroids are running around shitting everything they touch up and spreading their defective genes through rape to the superior races through subhuman mutt offspring that evangelicals weep when you abort.
Replies: >>6210 >>6307
>>6208
*aren’t really a problem
>>6200
chinks are the worst.
however while some of our guys (I’m assuming you’re accelerationist due to the huge overlap between ecofascists, exterminationists and accelerationists) get seriously anxious over the concept of filthy yellow bugmen coming to take the spoils of a collapsed West I think we’d have had enough training at damaging infrastructure to go after plastic ching chongfrastructure and wash out some millions of bugs by knocking out three bridges dam or whatever it was called.
Obviously when we get nukes Chinks will be second on the country list.
>>6207
You keep using the word contrarian as if it means something. Why yes, I do oppose things jews do. I guess that makes me some random word now. Pointless contention.

>>6208
>I have no clue what spurred you to bring this random contentious issue up 
Experience.
But I guess I was wrong this time.
It's nice that you don't also want to kill all Slavs. At least you have that going for you.
Replies: >>6313
>>6307
>I don’t know what contrarian means so it’s just some random word

>oh. At least you have opinion I agree on on completely unrelated issue going for you.

You sound like you have miserable self-esteem.
Replies: >>6368
>>6313
Contrarian is a word which jews and shills use to get people to conform. It is meaningless.
My views were substantiated better than yours were.
>>6200
>When he says "racial struggles", it's not about vague "tensions", it's about an all out-war to total annihilation.
No? Racial struggles have happened many times as far as Europe is concerned and these were not about extermination. Outright extermination is an extreme take on the concept of racial tensions or racial conflicts. I think Himmler saw that the populations were growing and soon enough there would be conflicts regarding living space and resources, and that for some groups the unifying force, the common denominator, would be that of race. At least for Germany. The statement is simply too vague to know what he was going for. Was he thinking about such tensions and how other nations would begin to see the world in the NS way too as looking after Germany? Himmler's words would only make sense with a secured Third Reich lasting for centuries. Or was he looking into carving out an even greater Lebensraum in other continents? Or most of all, was he thinking about race wars that would establish the undisputed ethnoglobe? I'm not against discussing these ideas but I simply see none in Himmler's few words and you look too much like someone trying to put words in his mouth.
Let's dig that sentence you refer to about Jews and cleanliness and see what form it takes, how ambiguous it is or not.
>I notice you didn't respond to my arguments about why exterminationism is necessary,
Must have been another fashanon.
For now I reckon that we are quite crowded on this planet, a position that was shared by several important thinkers in our movement. I also believe that overall I'd rather have a much Whiter planet in the way that non-White areas should be less populated. I am not against other cultures and there are some aspects of them that I event appreciate.
>>6379
"Contrarian" first came into major usage as an insult in the wake of the Ukrainian War. It was used almost entirely by reddit migrants shilling for NATO to demean anyone who meant it when we said we opposed NATO.
Contrarian is on the same level now as incel or racist. 
You overused it.

My views stand on their own. No one bases their opinions on yours. No one.
Replies: >>6394
>>6384
you literal 4/pol/er heathen. I use contrarian because my mom used to say it to describe me when I was angry at her as a child and did everything she didn’t want in a tantrum. That’s where I got it from.
>>6204
Trumpists masquerading as National-Socialists. You can spot them by their neurotic obsession with sandniggers.
Replies: >>6656
>>6416
Zionists have an obsession with sandniggers but it's not hard to be irritated by them too when you live in a White country that's been racially sabotaged by these same Zionists on purpose.

>contrarian
means contrarian. Who cares whence it comes?
[New Reply]
24 replies | 3 files | 20 UIDs
Connecting...
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

Select the solid/filled icons
- news - rules - faq -
jschan 1.4.1