/fascist/ - Surf The Kali Yuga

>>5411 (OP) 
well yeah, there’s a lot of ash worship among movementarians and christcucks. It’s almost like contrarianism. But that’s just what kids do.

What I do, and I encourage you to do this yourself, is strive to use technology against the System. Do you think the System is going to be defeated by you sitting in a cabin in the woods? No way.
Unabomber gets undeserved credit. He’s not wrong in a lot of aspects but he’s also a narrow-minded schizo.

I think you’re, and I am doing this too in response, overthinking things to a degree which barely anyone in our movement does, and thinking about large, multifaceted waves, the kind which there is no panacea, just sprouts from basic flaws such as cowardice, neuroticism, selfishness, and obsession.

These are just words. He who doesn’t think in actions thinks himself into inaction, and inaction is just a choice. Whether you prefer “monarcho-syndicalist-strasserism” over “accelerationist Hitlerism with Esoteric characteristics” won’t mean jackshit in the revolution.
Get a hobby.

>>5415
>Do you think the System is going to be defeated by you sitting in a cabin in the woods? No way.

>He’s not wrong in a lot of aspects but he’s also a narrow-minded schizo

My point exactly

>He who doesn’t think in actions thinks himself into inaction, and inaction is just a choice. Whether you prefer “monarcho-syndicalist-strasserism” over “accelerationist Hitlerism with Esoteric characteristics” won’t mean jackshit in the revolution.

This is similar to the analysis paralysis, part of what ZOG taught me as the OODA loop during my training in a Blackwater facility in Southern CA shortly after they stopped calling themselves "Blackwater".

It's also the point I was trying to make. All this progressively esoteric ideological nonsense only serves to separate otherwise amenable people based on silly, and failed, abstract criteria.

>won’t mean jackshit in the revolution

Yeah, I may or may not be far further than you are regarding that.

>Get a hobby.

This is a stupid and passive aggressive insult unworthy of you. Even if not intended as an insult it is gratuitous and only done to position yourself above another which you know nothing about. 

I have many hobbies, many centered around my own religion. I worship Truth as my God through contemplation, and learning any and all things which are true is part of that. 

I am an autodidact polymath. Que the the predictable jabs from disruptive and envious scum.

>>5411 (OP) 
Ted was correct about technology but it is impossible to go backwards. Even a complete collapse of civilization would not eliminate industrial technology.
Also, Ted's was a hero by American standards, but  his target selection was extremely poor.

>>5422
Ted was partially correct about technology. His target selection was shit and so was his implementation. He was a fucking failure and the people who idolozie him are just as fucking myopic. I'm OP btw

>>5425
Ted was not correct about technology. He was a conditioned, myopic schizophrenic that broke free from certain restraints, and having been so engrossed, freaked out, proceeding to snarl like a blind pit-bull in the face of scientific progression because of its sour taste in the hands of malevolent Jewish forces.
Progression isn't good for us, and this is why hylic spacks with some of our predispositions idealise reactionary attitudes towards industrial efficiency, that along with the social contagion and memery of The Industrial Revolution xyz, which aesthetically is unorthodox and admittedly sounds cool and ideologically occult, beyond-you educated.
Progression isn't good for us because it emboldens the System. When we establish the first officially evolved National Socialist state, progression will suddenly be shone as benevolent, as it will carry with it inevitably beauty, safety, and racial hope. This is why, for example, anyone comfortable and actually patriotic, say North Koreans if they live a good life in their district, will see progression as good.
Essentially, it is misplaced discomfort, but sounds cool as shit from the mouth of Ted, who was quite genius especially in mathematics, but of course, delusional: schizophrenic.

f33a3e9fcf396cc74fa853bbdad3ad097418913e405d9875b3fd679933c3ecb4.jpg
[Hide] (275.5KB, 909x1280) Reverse

>>5418
you know what, I shouldn’t have included that last part, it comes off as grumpy, uninspiring, and neurotic.
Yeah. It’s just something about imageboards that makes me throw every single unformatted thought I have for a message into the submission form and hit reply without reading it through again, because I know that it’s anonymous and I can leave it behind me or even samefag if I want to disavow myself later in a rare manner, also a nagging to be snarky because of a distant calling for epic trolling somewhere within my chest.
I am better than that. As supremacists we should hold each other up to these standards. And I apologise.

The only technology we need is weather modification. We can send fog and snow to beaner and chink areas before we clean them out. They could also die from attrition this way.

>>5495
this is an example of how technology can be used to our advantage (thank you.)
I think that a reason for contention and disagreement on “technology” is the fact that “technology” is a meek and meaningless term that:
• will obviously end up fulfilling the role of improving the ability of the designer to do the desired action
• for faggots, new sex toy technology is “development”; it’s an improvement an facilitation of desired lifestyle decisions (here inclusive of self-sustenance such as food)
• in a morally decadent, rotten, Jewish/Noahidian (shabbot goy) society, progression will mean the emulsification and thus facilitation of morally decadent, rotten, Jewish lifestyles
if you disagree, please tell me what I’m missing out on when yinz say “technology” referring to TIRAIC/TK/UNABOMBER