>>4232 (OP)
Im not a NatSoc nor a monarchist, but his argument is the same as for example a monarchy. In this case, if the ruler sucks, the people should be able to kill him. Tyrannicide. Meanwhile in a democracy, if you kill the ruler, it will be replaced by exactly another one that does the same thing, because in democracy, rulers nor people don't hold any power. Democracy is incompatible with liberty. This anon >>4234 is right.