>>15837
If it's done informally and secretly, then this to me means that it's being conducted in an environment, country, and territory still under jewish control instead of European homelands due to fear of reprisals or consequences. You could do it, I suppose, sort of like honor killings by jihadists or immigrant islamic rapefugee groups in the West which is different from the formalized honor killings in secure lands I originally thought you meant. However, they have the entire court system and police in their favor to begin with.
>a girl who is raised in an environment that requires women to be maids and any rebellion will end up dead, will make them evolved into never disobey their man of the house. Isn’t that how evolution works right?
Eventually, mostly yes, which is why many cultures had those features. However, these methods take a long time to see consistent good results, probably something like 4-5 generations with each generation being defined as 15-20 years. As mentioned with my previous example with the five daughters, even 'good' daughters from families prone to dysgenic daughters will carry the shit genes for a number of generations. Given the present state of wildly unchecked females in Western lands, you indeed have at least 3-4 generations of no real selective pressures against women which has been disastrous (massively dysgenic, especially in the past 2 generations).
Think of families with tall genes. Is everyone guaranteed to be tall? No. And of those who are tall, even ones paired with other tall partners, do they not produce short children sometimes due to some generational skips? Likewise so with what we're talking about. By contrast, you can partner men and women from tall families who consistently produce tall children every generation with few anomalies and your odds will be exceedingly good for producing tall children. But it still takes time.
If you are doing all this secretly, then this implies you are under jewish occupation, which then immediately follows that you do not have a lot of time or generations to fix things (as we do not now). Otherwise, if it's formalized and open, this assumes at least some nations wholly under European control / jewish defeat are in existence, which further implies access to advanced technology and an already established willingness to do extreme violence (Day of the Rope such events have already transpired). If that is the case, we're right back to my point about not really needing to use those methods due already applying extreme violence previously plus access to long-term means rendering them unnecessary.