>>26704
I would agree with his position, it makes the most sense to hope for universalism, but confident universalism seems like a step too far.
Matthew 7:13 usually isn't viewed as the number of people being saved, but a parable given by Jesus. It wouldn't make sense to think of it as a numerical calculation for who is saved (especially since other parables, such as the wheat and tares and 10 virgins would contradict the small number of saved.) Other verses, such as Rev 7:9, and Rom. 5:15-20 would contradict this.
Even if it was the number of people saved, universalists assert that people would be led to destruction, be purified, and then enter heaven.
Again, I'm not a universalist, I think that it is possible but not a given.