>>335159
<i'm referring to the fact that fags here think 4chan was made by epsteins elite deep state hacking group or whatever
Nobody thought this, you retarded nigger. I'll occasionally use 4plebs to monitor 4fags activity and propaganda directed towards jeets and browns, in a detached read-only way, and it was never an organic belief even on there. 4fags, however, is indeed (now) a state-sponsored glownigger hub: CP was used to strong-arm moot to surrender /b/ to glownigger mods long ago, which later spread to taking over key boards such as /pol/ and /k/, along with paid corporate shills such as Disney for /tv/, /v/, and many other major hobby boards. The sharty hack and leaks proved this beyond what was already known and self-evident, such as /k/ turning into NAFO troon-central, a complete loss of discussion and love of firearms and military tech, and so on over night. Even the permanent 24/7 Generals for Trump, Russia, Ukraine, enlistment, and so on are self-evidence of regular paid state-sponsored shilling and staffing with the mod / janny / owner support. All this besides obvious corporate sponsors on the blue boards with shitty products no one organically likes or cares to discuss.
This is no different from Anonymous-claimed hacker groups just being the Unit 8200, NSA, and other fedglowniggers now: it's correct to say they are state-sponsored federal actors, despite past Anonymous-derived groups such as LulzSec not showing evidence of being state-sponsored until the FBI, Mi5, and Shin Bet went after their members to arrest them / turn them into informants / etc.
TL;DR: sit down nigger. Something turned into glownigger central isn't proof of it being inorganic at the start or early years. Stop trying to falsely label anons with this already compromised logical fallacy, when the idea is already mocked within controlled digital spaces such as 4fags.