>>330744
Several problems
1. Even if you have a king, he will need some form of political ruling class. So it'll likely be an aristocracy and we've seen how they sell out their country as soon as they get a certain amount of wealth. It's almost as if there is a specific dollar amount that they must amass and then a switch activates and they go into full treason for the sake of fun mode.
2. You imagine that the king will be you or someone like you. That is very unlikely. More likely is that he is the most influential elite. But influential elites are the absolute worst ones.
3. Monarchy is pretty damn unlikely. To get a change in government, you'll need a revolution. ALL the elites oppose you and will oppose your revolution so you'll need to have a grassroots one. That's about the least likely place from which a monarchist ideology will arise. Furthermore, once the rebels take control, there will be many factions and most of them will be unwilling to surrender power to your chosen monarch. A literal "Who?"
>>330741
I live in a trailer park. ngl.
Maybe you live in a city. Maybe you live in a McMansion wasteland. Maybe you live in an isolated redneck utopia.
Given what you know about the jew worshiping, treasonous elite who literally make every decision based on what hurts you the most, would it be an improvement if laws were passed based on a pure referendum of everyone within 10 miles of you?