/b/ - Random

only the dead can know peace from this FUN


New Reply[×]
Name
Email
Subject
Message
Files Max 5 files32MB total
Tegaki
Password
Flag
[New Reply]


 Dress to impress!


half_cup_rice_per_week.jpeg
[Hide] (37.9KB, 598x213) Reverse
https://www.consumerreports.org/cro/magazine/2012/11/arsenic-in-your-food/index.htm
>consuming slightly more than a half-cup of cooked rice per day resulted in a significant increase in urinary arsenic levels, comparable to the effects of drinking a liter of water containing the federal maximum of 10 ppb arsenic
Is this real? As a AMWF hapa, I eat a cup or two of rice every day. I have rice for breakfast. I have rice for dinner. I usually have rice for lunch. I have rice for one or two snacks in the day. Is this real? How do Asians exist? Looks like the "federal maximum" of arsenic is 100μg in 1L of water though (bare minimum anyone would drink in a day) vs 10μg-30μg you would get with their numbers by eating 1/2 cup (100g) of white rice. So maybe they miscalculated.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/2F1MDzyW55pg97Tdpp7gqLN/should-i-be-concerned-about-arsenic-in-my-rice
>OI M8, YOU CAN'T EAT MO THAN HALF O CUP O ROICE IN A DAY, DAS SUICIDE!

Also, this high intellectual forum says it's bullshit:
https://reddit.com/r/IsItBullshit/comments/16t2obn/isitbullshit_rice_is_full_of_arsenic_and_rinsing/
Well rice is a plant and plants are sub-par foods at best, and mostly garbage with poison on average.
Replies: >>327156
>>327154
>plants are sub-par foods at best
Another genius contrarian take. There seems to be no imageboard left where the average user isn't mentally retarded. 

t. not OP
Replies: >>327161
la_creatura.mp4
[Hide] (7.3MB, 854x480, 01:22)
>Though arsenic can enter soil or water due to weathering of arsenic-containing minerals in the earth, humans are more to blame than Mother Nature for arsenic contamination in the U.S. today, according to the federal Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. The U.S. is the world's leading user of arsenic, and since 1910 about 1.6 million tons have been used for agricultural and industrial purposes, about half of it only since the mid-1960s. Residues from the decades of use of lead-arsenate insecticides linger in agricultural soil today, even though their use was banned in the 1980s. 

It's not the rice it's the toxic amerimutt pesticides that caused this.

>lead-arsenate pesticide
Fuck amerifat retards and fuck all pesticides, it's all jewish poison to poison people with over some shady kike mythical story that has never been proven of ~20% crop gains. Pesticides are the same story as vaccines. I bet its actually -gain to crops and it's all fucking fake.
>>327156
He's actually trolling. You've just got owned!
56b295990e9bb11e7d5642f31c7bb41a31c2657ee31abc4989f8682c40624156.jpg
[Hide] (1.9MB, 4096x2946) Reverse
Asians can be very particular about washing their rice, but how common is that elsewhere?
>>327153 (OP) 
The arsenic found organically in plants is pretty much harmless
Replies: >>333580
>>327153 (OP) 
Removing the bran off of (brown) rice and making it white rice is supposed to remove a lot of the arsenic, so IDK where all the extra is coming from. People also generally wash their rice. 

>AMWF hapa
May I ask which type of Yellow yer father was out of personal curiosity?
You are all wrong. Asians are smaller than whites which is why they can survive eating only half a cup of rice for their base each day.
Replies: >>332602
>>327153 (OP) 
Was your mom a jap?
((())).webp
[Hide] (13.4KB, 240x175) Reverse
>>327153 (OP) 
This is literally just an article to shill some ((( Lundberg ))) brand nobody would care about otherwise.
>>332591
Being tall is a curse for actual legitimate survival.
>>332602
For day to day subsistence survival, perhaps. But there is a reason taller stronger humans triumph in war over the millennia. Yes, you can cherry pick certain examples from history where technology played a counterfactor, but big caveman beats little caveman on average.
Replies: >>332745
They definately grow rice on mars
>>332602
No it isn't.
>>327153 (OP) 
>rice drink
What gets fucking turned into a drink other than sake?
>>332602
>manlet cope
Back to huffing farts you 4 foot tall gnome.
9244756d7595a8fe5dd842af3362d1d7ddb6e36407ce254f4aaa0d659da96f85.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 1200x600) Reverse
>>332626
>But there is a reason taller stronger humans triumph in war over the millennia.
>Yes, you can cherry pick certain examples from history where technology played a counterfactor
The gun has made height more of a detriment. Tallfags probably don't have a higher survival rate as such on the battlefield anymore.
Better to just be of average height or a touch below it, especially if you want to operate any part of a tank. Armies don't like shoving lanklets in tight spaces.
Replies: >>332746 >>332749
>>332745
>Better to just be of average height or a touch below it
All weapon optics and scopes and rangefinders, including the PSO and PSU series found everywhere around the world, are scientifically designed for your height as the baseline though.
Replies: >>332786
>>332745
>even more manlet cope
And I'm sure you're totally a sergeant major lieutenant general master chief with 100 confirmed kills under your belt.
>>332746
I am not enough of a /k/fag to understand basically anything in this post. Sorry. If you would like to explain, that would be great, but I have a sneaking suspicion that you're just going to call me names and not do that.
Replies: >>332812
>>332786
>I have a sneaking suspicion that you're just going to call me names
Faggot
>>327153 (OP) 
I'm Iranian. Iranian rice is lower in arsenic and carcinogens to begin with and the Iranian methods of cooking rice cut arsenic content by around 40 (quick version, aka "kateh") to 70 percent (traditional version, aka parboiled method). Rinsing/straining rice before cooking has minimal affect on arsenic, btw, but can reduce it by like 30% if you really go to town on it, but you will also wreck the nutrient profile. Usually it only affects arsenic quantity by like 10% while costing you vitamins.

Also, some rice types have much lower arsenic to begin with. Basmati white rice typically carries like half the arsenic and cadmium compared to your average white rice. Sushi rice also typically has lower arsenic content. As does jasmine rice from Thailand.

On that note, the source is also important. Pakistani rice is most likely to have high arsenic quantities, iirc, but it can vary depending on which rice you're buying. Some brands are far more conscientious of their quality than others. Still, even Pakistani rice is fucking amazing (having roughly half the amount of arsenic) compared to most American rice, but rice from California has a much lower arsenic profile compared to rice from Texas, Louisiana, or Arkensas. This is because Californians didn't go ham on arsenical pesticides in the first place. Probably California's Insecticide Law of 1901 had some effect on cutting on down bullshit pesticides before they ever saw serious adoption. Honestly getting white rice grown in California is pretty safe.

Getting white basmati rice grown in California, India, or Pakistan is usually around the best for arsenic levels (California best, Pakistan worst). Or just getting Iranian rice (which is generally even better, except vs California white basmati), but that's usually not as easy to find. Also learning to cook rice with the traditional Iranian method will wipe out an enormous amount of arsenic in your rice.

>>327191
It's not that straightforward. While organic arsenic has carbon bonds that neutralize most of its harm factor, that doesn't mean all the arsenic found in rice is organic arsenic. In fact, rice is particularly at risk of absorbing inorganic (meaning "not organic") arsenic from the soil.
[New Reply]
Connecting...
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

Select the solid/filled icons
- news - rules - faq -
jschan 1.7.3