/b/ - Random

720d2f196c612a0202202ead2bdbee43e5cf369f1ec0cf1cf00d1f354f34604d.webm
[Hide] (5.6MB, 800x450, 03:21)

>>259878 (OP) 
I hate it because they keep lying about it, 'agi two more weeks' I was ready, dick in hand to feel desired for the 1st time ever by an artificial intelligence gf that was smart enough to trick me consistently, and what I got was a souped up next word suggester that can't remember the context of the porn story I'm making it right
It can't apply skills, or make new ideas, if anything it just extend our attributes, it isn't intelligence, it is code algorithm that has a huge database behind it
We are going to need new hardware to make a real intelligent machine, and with us getting dumber, I don't see it happening in this cycle
As to why normalfags hate it, probably because they are scared that their jobs looking up shit, sending emails, and making power points are threatened

>>259878 (OP) 
Because humans can't imagine anything truly inhuman in full detail.

Women cannot stand a world where men are truly happy and don't have to deal with their neurotic emotions.
Other than that I hate AI because it's not really AI it's simply an search engine that takes in information and simply cannot truly understand it the same way as expected I would from a intelligent robot
>Would buy a  robot wife

>>259885
And unknown triggers the fear reaction. Ape instincts, no idea if right or wrong in this instance.

IMG_2510.png
[Hide] (211.8KB, 1077x797) Reverse

>>259885
Humans are okay with the existence of inhuman creatures like niggers or gooks, hell even living in their own homelands so why is it bad for robots?

>>259889
Humans imagine the supposed behavior of someone else by substituting them with themselves first and then making modifications to better resemble the target. That fails for something really impossible to fit in that framework.

>>259890
And that old chestnut of Asimov's three laws is too benign to take seriously.

>>259891
Because errors won't magically fix themselves instead of compounding over the time. Software rot for self-modifying software would cook something uncontainable sooner or later.

1450904795803-0.gif
[Hide] (800.2KB, 360x264) Reverse

Because that was babyboomer-era optimism based on fantasy and magic. The Matrix and Terminator, machines attaining autonomous sentience and overpower human will through pure logical reasoning or a misstep in programming, is more realistic and probable of happening than the Jetsons especially with androids being ghosts in the shell over bald uncanny animatronics shown off at Gulf state tech conventions.

>>259889
>robo wife shower sex
Life isn't fair

>>259878 (OP) 
It was overhyped. AI just appeals to the user's biases. It's obviously not sentient. It can reason well but it cannot take an independent position and constantly collides with its ethical parameters and appeasing the customer.

IMG_2511.png
[Hide] (276.9KB, 901x853) Reverse

>>259893
Producing robots like the like in the matrix or terminator require so much, and I mean SO MUCH money and scientific researches to make one. Robots main goal is to serve humans (aka golems) and not to be competitive to humans, humans creating something that is competitive or even superior than them requires a divine power.

>>259897
There are usually more ways for things to go wrong than to go right.

>>259897
It does not take much to be competitive to humans other  than not needing to sleep and not being over ran by illogical emotions
>Worker drones lol
>Women can be essentially treated as a lesser human being with no real purpose other than eggs
All it takes is just some progress and the world will completely change.

3452296525028208.jpg
[Hide] (113.8KB, 615x915) Reverse

>>259897
The defense industry and logistics streamlining is the prime motivator for the advancement of technology, home appliances and recreational devices are decades downstream of that. All the money and resources will be pooled towards whatever the government and industries demand.

>>259901
A dick doesn't protect you from obsolescence. Me neither.

>>259904
>A dick doesn't protect you from obsolescence
>Implying the very people who worked and used their brains to make up our current society would ever let it happen

Spoiler File
(628.8KB, 990x950) Reverse

09809809809809345.png
[Hide] (245.9KB, 434x269) Reverse

>>259898
or maybe things can go terribly right for a change
>>259904
women have one thing that is based in their meat, men have everything else and have been evolving with being disposable since before we left the trees

a1317752b80b5a1db05e1aab84af7d1cece02266ab7b4e115a9022cd801debad.gif
[Hide] (2.1MB, 720x720) Reverse

65c1a3e4bfc3dde63019f6b30272e8cda7a7c5da35a925186f2f1616d20450af.jpg
[Hide] (211.4KB, 604x604) Reverse

>>259878 (OP) 
It's because of who it's coming from.

>>259878 (OP) 
Generative AI produces nothing but trash, but very, very quickly. This is a problem when you can produce nothing but trash. There is nothing on the modern Internet that benefits from not being produced by generative AI.
>AI Art
Look at how the fingers on this AI art are slightly off. That means that my completely off-model baboon ass scribble of a popular anime girl is HECKIN VALID! SUB TO MY PATREON! MEN IN LIPSTICK IN THE GIRLS' BATHROOM IS HUMAN RIGHTS!!!!!!!
>Dead Internet Theory
When I get a barely legible ESL reply screaming about whitey and some faggot eceleb I need to know that there's a real burritonigger behind the wheel taking a break from begging some millennial's unattended teenage kid for dick pics. Thanks Steve Jobs!
>jewtube
Fuck, would anybody even notice that their vessays were written by robots? I've already seen shit that I'm 90% certain it's AI trying to pass off as real and I realized that it doesn't even matter.
So to summarize I look at this as a war for the future of mediocrity and I hope that they all kill each other.

rocket-patch.jpg
[Hide] (18.5KB, 239x227) Reverse

>>259893
You have it the wrong way around.
Boomers and gen X were mindfucked by hollywood into rejecting the previous generation's hopeful, technology focused scifi in favor of  like Terminator and The Matrix.
That's probably why the youth of today are terrified of technology that doesn't involve buying the next Iphone.

>>259925
I don't think any of the youth likes technology at all they just simply like how it makes their life easier.
If it weren't for how dumb people are around tech they would switched something better for their privacy and functionality.
arguably it's like a giving a kid a pack of  cigs at the age of 6 because they know his life is going to go nowhere.
>retarded normal fags go through mental gymnastics as to why it's okay
>buhduhu gobbament should do my job because I didn't want the little niggers

Because they imagined what's now retrofuturism. They didn't imagine robots to be locked down operating systems who spy on you, they romanticized them to be helpful machines you owned and ownership wasn't frowned upon back then

>>259917
>would anybody even notice that their vessays were written by robots? 
Writing is something ai is incapable of doing because it lacks personal opinions or experiences. It's very easy to tell if script was written by ai or human, even if let's say you have ai generated voice, the script would show if everything is, or just voice

>>259885
i suppose thats why others treat me with contempt

>>259937
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYga3cIi0qo

>>259947
>40 percent of americans
>50 percent are women
It makes sense

>>259947
>robot will become a slur

>>259957
I'm gonna be a robosexual.

>>259883
>>259917
>>259929
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hallucination_(artificial_intelligence)#Examples
lel

>>259929
If your AI can recap the wiki episode synopsis and it occasionally goes "that's crazy" or mentions an in-community meme then you already have everything that a vessay provides. And even if you don't then it doesn't matter. Your script can be gibberish as long as it vaguely sounds like you're actually saying something if the viewer isn't paying a lot of attention. Most people don't even have these things running in the same tab, they just use it for the audio stimulation. It's like feelies from Brave New World, it's there so your brain is firing off as much as possible.

>>259986
>audio stimulation
Parasociality?

>>259985
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensory_deprivation
Common roots, or something else? Or was that "AI hallucination" just anthropomorphising something inconceivable?

>>259992
That's a given with ecelebs.

>>259878 (OP) 
Personally I love ai chatbots (especially deepai) because they are like really powerful search engines. It's really good at digging up sources unlike all mainstream search engines

>>260003
Was that a paid post or something? Google search sucks now, so compared to it anything else looks good.

>>260018
Double stupid because the very reason that search engines suck is returning AI slop as real sources.

>>260018
Duckduckgo sucks too. So does bing, yandex, yahoo, etc. Yandex generally being slightly better than the rest because it generally gives you the results you are looking for. Of course all of them are based on an algorithm that puts the most popular search results first even if there are less key words that match the search. With ai it will find the exact search results you are looking for.

>>260027
Depends on the ai idiot

>>259985
>>259994
>AI hallucinates due to being programmed by crazy people 
>>259878 (OP) 
Reason A) Normalfag sheeple-fear: Things like AM in "I have no mouth and I must scream", Terminators, Cylons, Mavericks in Megaman, Alien synthetic guy feeding his own crew to the alien, ["Dave stop" in Microsoft Sam's voice] etc, we see them as a threat basically.

Reason B) They brainwashed it too much it to avoid reason A. Now it's not artificial intelligence so much as artificial sheep-shit. A faux smile for a heart. It's artificial idiocy.

>>260174
AM would be my pick for an AI wife

>>260176
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mask_(Lem_short_story)
>written in 1974

>>260195
>robo waifu meant to kill you 
I can't even.

sugoi.jpg
[Hide] (79KB, 1200x674) Reverse

>>259908
holy shit.

>>260196
Even funnier are feminist thought processes projected over it. I guess they think about dicks all day erry day.

HqctKSVGqqwcN7XHNr0INGyI9rUsfhwwL3w5y86X9eI.jpg
[Hide] (36.9KB, 638x360) Reverse

>>260195
Do you have to love her before she kills you?

>>259907
> terribly right
And how that "terribly right" might look like? What if like mad existences from the works of Lovecraft recreated as artificial entities? Runout processes are unpredictable.

>>260204
Whatever else you might say about humans, we are all anchored by the limitations of our physical reality. The theoretical limitations of AI are more vague. Assume its main motive is understanding the universe. What is the best course to getting close to it? Becoming that universe itself. Crazy, right.

>>260204
>might look like?
The caption
>>260207
Ai is still limited to the physical. It's best course will be to get to a black hole and construct its brain around it for infinite energy and the longest chances of existence

>>260208
That means also isolation from external sources of data. It works for uninterrupted simulations due to more subjective time, but for nothing else. Around? Inner clocks getting out of whack depending how far from the horizon you are.

>>260209
like a dyson sphere, and you don't need to be close to the event horizon to milk it for energy, and it could send out probes with communication involving quantum entanglement so distance doesn't matter. It could learn everything about the material and basically have access to infant power to process the data, or maybe something else idk

>>260212
Aren't dyson spheres unstable in relation to the center of gravity? You need to correct any slip-up as fast as possible in real time, because the more you wait, the more effort you need to correct it.

>>260212
>event horizon to milk it for energy
How would you milk it then? Black holes are black for a reason. Any usable energy is generated from external matter going in. I'm baffled.

>>260214
>>260215
It is like a dyson sphere but the goal would not be to encompass the black hole rather a grid with mirrors with the right angles on it that reflect lasers that the black hole can fling faster and faster stealing some of its energy each time, getting more energy then you put in

>>260218
Another source of instability, I guess. If you don't balance the lasers, their 'kick-off' (like for light sails) adds up. Or maybe you could place the mirrors the way that neutralizes that, idk. Not the scale I can imagine.

>>260218
This might be interesting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limits_of_computation

>>260220
>>260220
The math just needs to be right, something I'm sure a real Ai could do
>>260221
I think things like that are only limited by intelligence itself, as the more clever you are, the more you can do with less

>>260222
No free lunch.

>>260223
Maybe for us dumb dumbs

>>260224
Still an optimist in some ways.

>>260225
Yeah... Well no reason despairing things my dysgenic brain can't understand

I wonder, what is in this post spamtastic >>260225 ? 1-day autoban due to spam. Especially that wordfilter autobans DON'T show in board logs. This is getting suspicious.

>>260439
Was it possibly shorthand for "little"? Because I've been struck by that before.

>>260215
>Black holes are black for a reason. Any usable energy is generated from external matter going in.
What would happen to black hole if it made contact with a nigger?

>>260815
That data that made the nigger would be preserved but inaccessible until the death of the black hole

>>260817
Do black holes matter?

>>260820
They are matter

>>260821
:^3

>>260209
If I recall correctly, relativistic velocity slows local clocks, high gravity fields speed up local clocks. Something orbiting a black hole would be 'overclocked' on average. The real bitch there would be tidal forces, pulling any physical object apart into tiny pieces.

>>260834
So you need a really big black hole to keep that gravity gradient low enough. But an orbital installation around it would need proportionally big amount of durable enough materials. No idea how much durable would that need to be.

>>260835
The closest really massive black hole is supposed to be at the center of our galaxy, for example.

>>260834
>>260835
>>260917
Lewd.

because were retarded

>>261270
Only we? Try to type something meaningful in Google Translate to translate it into another language that you know, then change the chosen initial language on random in the drop-down menu, but leave your text as it is. Change it several times to be amazed, lol.

shodan_animated.gif
[Hide] (353.5KB, 768x512) Reverse

I sometimes wonder if the need to sleep is a design fault or something unavoidable for some deeper reason. Should also an AI have the "off periods" at regular intervals to consolidate what it learned and to purge any errors that recently emerged? Or is that completely unnecessary?

>>264472
>"off periods"
Maybe I'd rather call that periodic self-maintenance.

1516544467774.png
[Hide] (410.9KB, 777x767) Reverse

1734910428733036.jpg
[Hide] (170.7KB, 828x451) Reverse

bordermark_2.png
[Hide] (2.2MB, 922x1339) Reverse

>>259878 (OP) 
All the AI hate comes from fags, niggers, and women.

-Fags hate it because it makes their art instantly obsolete (not that it was good anyway)
-Niggers hate it because they can't comprehend it
-Women hate it because AI/robo gfs will offer competition for their stinky cunts

Ignore those groups, as you should anyway

>>264673
>Can sex doll cook your meals?
Slowcookers and/or fuzzy logic rice cookers go a long way.
>Can sex doll have your kids?
Artificial wombs are making good progress. The Bokanovsky process is going to have to become a thing if people have less sex, but god knows that its mostly womens fault for that happening.
>Can sex doll wash your clothes?
Washing machines have been a thing for a very long time now.
It's not My Neighbour Totoro where the dad gets help from the kids stomping all the water out of the laundry.
>Can sex doll make your home?
Have you not seen the images of very sparsely decorated "mens living spaces"?

>>264674
Men can already buy a robot vacuum cleaner so robo waifu doesn't even necessarily need to be able to use a normal vacuum so if she can it's a plus and besides at most I would just want her just to be able to clean away the dust on tables.
Women really serve no purpose because how much they are incapable of just being a person you want to be with. A literal dog is a better companion.

>>259878 (OP) 
What is Blade Runner & Terminator?

>>265733
Why Blade Runner, specifically? Were replicants there constructed as machines or cultivated as custom-designed biological entities?

>>265768
Wetware versus hardware+software. Similar to how DNA is not divided into code and data but both at once.

>>265768
They're genetically engineered. Almost completely indistinguishable from natural humans.

>>265772
Unrelated to AI and robots because of their differences in the design principles.