Someone has routinely spammed a forum with a bot (that defeats captchas) that mentions "secretniggerchan" and "420chan" like they are some cool kids' club you don't know about. The bot's posts are incoherent noise, but always include something like "btw do you know the addresss of secretniggerchan?". The janny deletes 100 of these posts every day.
Then one day a user jokes, "yeah, anon. i get my ISOs from secretniggerchan".
There are two possible actions the janny can make against this post:
A) delete it
B) ignore it
A janny shall distinguish between:
A.1) removing noise (flood/spam), and;
A.2) moderating topics of discussion.
In this case, the janny has been deleting bot posts under reason A.1) removing noise (flood/spam). If the janny now chooses A) delete it, it wouldn't be for reason A.1) removing noise (flood/spam), because he knows it wasn't made by the bot. And if he justifies it he can only do so for reason A.2) moderating topics of discussion, which is false. Therefore, the janny who chooses A) is butthurt.
Would you fall for the butthurt janny dilemma?