/b/ - Random

veganism is a psyop with the objective of make people weak and not being able to think properly by not eating meat, with improves brain activity and a healthy body. And it also has a market utility, so they can also get money by selling expensive pseudo-food, so is a double win for them.

idk go ask a vegan. I doubt anyone here is one.

>>197007
It was more of a rhetorical question, I agree with >>197005

>>197002 (OP) 
>plants have feelings
Okay Azure-Hair poster. Hate them so you can fit in. You'll eat bugs later instead.

>>197027
Bugs also have feelings.

The only thing you should be allowed to consume is sunlight. The sun is giving it's light to everyone on earth for free, everything else is stealing.

>>197034
>The only thing you should be allowed to consume is sunlight.
Isn't this what Breatharianism is about?

>>197034
What if light and or energy is a soul too?

f49a8b93a985c5e50bce155e53a8d7e5c1d2bc8baad84f1399b2ff7f5e5eeb07.png
[Hide] (776.7KB, 1023x763) Reverse

>>197030

Because the more sanctimonious the belief the more retarded they are. If you're eating plants to "save da po' po' animaws" you're probably a fuckin dumbass hypocrite anti-human, which is why so many of them are also rabid communists.

>>197030
Nice cherrypicking, the majority of plants don't do things like that.

>>197134
Good thing that most plants aren't cherries then

Plants don't have eyes and they can't lean in to your hand when you pet them. That's all there really is to it. It's hard to assign empathy to something you have to remind yourself is sentient.

>>197138
>Plants don't have eyes and they can't lean in to your hand when you pet them. That's all there really is to it. It's hard to assign empathy to something you have to remind yourself is sentient.
t. breaks branches and tramples flowers wherever he goes

>>197134
What about poisonous plants? Plants kill animals so they can decompose and plants can have nutrients. If plants weren't self aware, why did they develop poisons to kill them

>>197141
Yes? What's your point?

25104540d5b530ff901e0995741362ed73fd4362e65501bcba063685941a1531.png
[Hide] (2.4MB, 1080x1080) Reverse

>>197143
That you are a brute.

>>197032
But its meat and you don't want 'rights' for all animals hence my joke becomes that you'll be eating bugs after we run out of cows n chickens n fish n such. If a vegan you'd be against eating bugs, no one ever makes this connection though due to the political psyops causing people such cognitive bias.

>>197005
This but not just "people" look what type, or race to be more precise, of people are the main target for this psyop.

>>197522
The "whites" (they're not white nor from those Noah mountains bro) are the most sophisticated and thus also the most altruisitic and thus the most empathetic. This makes them naturally evolve into being sissies that don't wanna hurt an animal. Europoid is correct by the by, not white. Race is a social construct. two niggers hate one another. Why? Differeing race, aka gangs. Russians and their neighbors have a different language and all, ergo hatred of their own ethnicty on account of what actually is race. Where was race cointed? Germany in the 1700s when the jews were trying to make everyone think that they were "White" because le color matters so much. Guess what? Hitler liked the Nips. Stop using fake words human. If there was snow you survived the ice age and that made your genes better. You can't admit to it though because better depends literally on the situation. In a lawless society niggers would be the ones 'in charge', not that anyone is in charge, it takes a village to make a man, but whatever cause you won't get this.

>>197572
*coined

251646c3cdfb0b6397c610458b4411bb.png
[Hide] (755.6KB, 1000x1300) Reverse

>>197002 (OP) 
>when the latter has been demonstrated to also have consciousness and feelings
Demonstrated is a big exaggeration, they don't even have a brain. Post your best evidence for that.
>it's more cruel to eat plants than animals, because plants are completely innocent, while animals eat other animals or plants
In a way that's true (excluding carnivorous plants I guess), but consider that most of the crops are fed to livestock, so in the end consuming meat essentially leads to more plant deaths. Also, if we want to get quite autistic, don't some plants have antimicrobial properties? And the microbes, likewise, can kill too. In the end, no matter what living things do while alive, some other living things will have to perish. Mother Nature is cruel. The copium (but not really, since it's true) that you can be on is that, thankfully, most living beings don't have a consciousness, they don't have feelings and don't feel pain. Is a piece of grass on the ground able to care if you step on it? Not even bugs care if you tear off one of their limbs arguably:
https://libreddit.northboot.xyz/r/askscience/comments/a2fv96/can_bugs_feel_pain/

>>197005
Is eating meat really necessary to be healthy? Don't people also eat a lot of low quality meat too? Proteins can also be found elsewhere. Besides, I doubt many fat people that exist are vegans.

>>197061
Communism is an ideology that supposedly focuses on the working class, not animals. But production inevitably kills some animals, even just building a house probably kills even thousands of insects. But I don't think most vegans live like Diogenes, with the bare minimum, so I guess the question is "where do we cross the line between what is necessary and not"? I don't think there isn't an answer that isn't arbitrary, honestly. Those who blame capitalism for animal violations or pollution are kind of coping - communism also inevitably commits such violations (other examples: they had meat in the USSR, and the USSR was a greatly polluting country, look it up).

>>197652
*I don't think there is

8dbd761d9b17fe2ea56bde65fb0815fb9162285676333b95a140bb7b8ad1aac5.png
[Hide] (246.1KB, 500x500) Reverse

>>197572