/b/ - Random

>>196301
The chad "yes" meme is one of the stupidest memes imagined. It's the embodiment of "I have no argument"

You don't even know what a tomboy is, you just assume masculine girl.
Tomboys are active, agressive instead of passive aggressive, straightforward instead of manipulative, lack vanity and prefer hobbies over being pretty and meek. There is no reason a tomboy has to dislike housework or being feminine, they just want to be hands-on and unfiltered. Tomboy aesthetic also commonly emphasizes fitness and practicality, which is attractive for its simplicity and health, and the fact that you don't have to be burdened with expensive and impractical styles or bad self-serving habits.
It's fine if having a needy girly girl makes you feel more like a manly man, but some guys want their interactions to be stimulating and pure.

0462ede054823ecd9262c31b6a71377b09b8c0e3181805d335bddd9ac63062c1.jpg
[Hide] (118KB, 640x659) Reverse

>>196303
It's ok, anon.
I'm glad you like girly girls.
Have a wonderful day, friendo.

>>196308
>You don't even know what a tomboy is, you just assume masculine girl.
That's semantic masturbation. When "tomboy" is used 99% of times it means masculine girl unless specified otherwise.
Anyway, going by your definition, it sounds OK enough, though I personally still see reservedness and passiveness as good values at least for women. Anyway, since that's not what I meant by "tomboy", but rather the popular definition (masculine women), that's off-topic.

>>196320
Tomboy is the contemporary response to the archetype set by media such as Barbie, Mean Girls and that type of shit.
In truth, the reserved and caring attributes of the 1800s woman are more present on tomboys than the modern interpretation of 'girly' girls.

>>196320
if your definition is corret then I am willing to admit I'm mistaken. I get defensive because all the tranny shit tried to relabel tomboys. I just want people to stop trying to convince tomboys that there's something wrong with them, or that they're men. They're just girls with hobbies/interests that don't align with girly girls. But sure, a man's mind but with a purely functional female body is kind of an odd fetish, sure.

>>196320
>When "tomboy" is used 99% of times it means masculine girl
No it doesn't, that's modern tranny revisionism.

f8b11e4419c696f9e9af126e42d8e5c8c45d50fb7f3154801a880b4296ae17c0.png
[Hide] (25.1KB, 699x576) Reverse

>>196297 (OP) 
I personally think that all of them are great and they're only great in 2d. None of them poop or have aids

>>196369
Why are anglos like this?

>>196369
It's their personal sick headcanon so it ultimately does not matter for 2D.

ed03ae974018c18373ed993fa794b10072b765d8f988acd6a46dc66085bbfd61.png
[Hide] (782.3KB, 640x994) Reverse

>>196297 (OP) 
>I don't get the appeal of tomboys.
Then you don't get it, and there's no need to make a fucking thread about it.
>where one tells oneself that "it's fine" because 'she' still has a pussy?
Do we need to go through first grade biology again?
Boys have a penis, girls have a vagina. Simple as.
It makes no sense for you to imply that a woman might not be a woman when she has a fucking vagina.
>Though admittedly the latter is less gay.
The latter isn't gay, because the latter has a vagina.
>We aren't cavemen anymore, and unless you live in a thirdie shithole, there's no practical benefit for a woman to be strong and agile.
It's not a bad thing for a woman to be able to protect herself and her family when you might not necessarily be around to do that (work, war etc)
>>196320
>That's semantic masturbation. When "tomboy" is used 99% of times it means masculine girl unless specified otherwise.
<...according to my very specific definition

>>196383
>Then you don't get it, and there's no need to make a fucking thread about it.
<Dude, threads are not a renewable source bro, if you don't get something just look it up on Reddit duderino
>Do we need to go through first grade biology again?
>Boys have a penis, girls have a vagina. Simple as.
>It makes no sense for you to imply that a woman might not be a woman when she has a fucking vagina.
>The latter isn't gay, because the latter has a vagina.
If you are playing the reductionist "a woman is just a walking pussy" card, you wouldn't even care if she's a tomboy or not, as long as she has a pussy. Or you could go fuck one of those tranny freaks like on this picture.
>It's not a bad thing for a woman to be able to protect herself and her family when you might not necessarily be around to do that (work, war etc)
Protect from what exactly? Again, I said "unless you live in a thirdie shithole".
><...according to my very specific definition
Just go into any imageboard and look for people mentioning "tomboy", or mention it yourself, and see what most people will discuss about.
>phonigger pic
Very funny, it makes an assumption that somehow a woman can either only be a giga-golem, OR like a hypermasculine man but with a pussy.

8d86b164192819f2e6cdc4aea1d3953840df07bbbb30e93d352167f561bee162.mp4
[Hide] (1.1MB, 640x480, 00:15)

>>196383
>when you might not necessarily be around to do that
>war
<yes, goy, you need hypermasculine women so that you can die for israel with peace of mind

>>196385
<<Dude, threads are not a renewable source bro, if you don't get something just look it up on Reddit duderino
<dude just slide that shit off, noone cares lol
>Or you could go fuck one of those tranny freaks like on this picture.
Note the word "tranny". The fact that you're even bringing them up makes whatever argument you're trying to make worthless.
>Protect from what exactly?
Anyone who would wish you harm.
>Again, I said "unless you live in a thirdie shithole".
Everywhere is a varying degree of a third world shithole now.
>>196386
<yes, goy, you need a completely defenseless vapid cunt for woman so that tyrone can kick your door down and rape her when you're not looking

I know I'm being that guy, but I think I get both sides of the argument. A strong wife births strong children, but women are so unladylike nowadays that it's hard to look at them and say that you want something similar to that, even if the result would be objectively superior.

>>196388
><dude just slide that shit off, noone cares lol
There are a lot of utterly worthless threads and I make sure to bump the interesting ones.
>Note the word "tranny". The fact that you're even bringing them up makes whatever argument you're trying to make worthless.
???
Are you implying that I am a tranny enabler myself for saying that a person is not purely defined by their genitals? That's way different from saying that you can actually become the opposite sex by changing your behavior and taking hormones and mutilating your body. And faggotry goes both ways, being attracted to appearance/behavior of the same sex, and being attracted to genitals of the same sex. Feels good to be a pure heterosexual.
>Anyone who would wish you harm.
>Everywhere is a varying degree of a third world shithole now.
Maybe you were born and lived your whole life in Mexico or Brazil or whatever, but I live in a relatively safe country and that's even accounting for the fact that I live near a big city and have subHumans roaming around.

2b1b9c60fb6429ac47553fe955a1581d725afdb46b69f965d3850443583ff6c3.gif
[Hide] (496.4KB, 500x455) Reverse

>>196388
><yes, goy, you need a completely defenseless vapid cunt for woman so that tyrone can kick your door down and rape her when you're not looking
Sorry to burst your bubble, but real life is not like whatever degenerate nigger cuck porn your rub your prostate to.

>>196392
Don't relax.

>>196390
>A strong wife births strong children
With strong food.
>>196391
>being attracted to appearance/behavior of the same sex
As soon as you imply that gender can be a mental thing, trannies will immediately slip through that crack.
I'm sure you know how John Moneys little experiment went.
>but I live in a relatively safe country
It's safe, until it isn't.
>>196392
See >>196395

>>196396
>As soon as you imply that gender can be a mental thing, trannies will immediately slip through that crack.
>I'm sure you know how John Moneys little experiment went.
That's some extreme slippery slop schizo bullshit. And >I'm fighting the trannies by rejecting gender roles. You could as well be one of those discord femboys and be proud of how masculine you are because you have 1 withered penis.
>It's safe, until it isn't.
More "two more weeks" slippery slop nonsense.
And even if we assume that in two more weeks rapist niggers will start falling from the sky literally everywhere in the world, and you will be out of home 24/7 wagecucking or fighting for israel or whatever, and discard solutions such as having a safer home that's harder to break into, you can still have a wife that can do self-defense WITHOUT fully abandoning her femininity and being a hypermasculine muscled caveman, by methods such as using weapons/guns, or doing martial arts, or whatever.
Your suppressed homosexuality is not justified EVEN if your nigger cuckold fetish came true.

>>196398
>You could as well be one of those discord femboys and be proud of how masculine you are because you have 1 withered penis.
And yet, women seem to go nuts over fictional variants of them. Or is that them saying that they want one thing and actually wanting something else?
I don't know what goes through their heads, and how it relates to what comes out of their mouths.
>discard solutions such as having a safer home that's harder to break into
A chain is only as strong as its weakest link. A well protected home means nothing if your tard son gets social-engineered into granting a nig access into your home.
Point is, there's only so much you can do.
>fully abandoning her femininity and being a hypermasculine muscled caveman
Black and white thinking. Tomboys don't have to be anywhere near the other end of that spectrum.
>Your suppressed homosexuality
Kafkatrap.

>>196400
>And yet, women seem to go nuts over fictional variants of them. Or is that them saying that they want one thing and actually wanting something else?
>I don't know what goes through their heads, and how it relates to what comes out of their mouths.
OK? Not sure how that's relevant. Is that some "2D lolicons are attracted to real children" type of bullshit?
>A chain is only as strong as its weakest link. A well protected home means nothing if your tard son gets social-engineered into granting a nig access into your home.
>Point is, there's only so much you can do.
Sure, but it's also your duty to make sure your family is not retarded and knows the dangers, etc etc.
>Black and white thinking. Tomboys don't have to be anywhere near the other end of that spectrum.
Yet you never denied it until now, and this picture (>>196383) which idealizes a similar thing doesn't help either.
>Kafkatrap.
Did you just recite a random "word" you found on wikipedia or reddit yesterday? You say that it's fine to be attracted to a person no matter how masculine that person is as long as that person possesses a pussy. I call that out as gay. It's not rocket science or some dumb reddit buzzword.

>>196401
>age of consent
Kike invention. It should be "as long as they're not less than half your age it's fine".

>>196405
>>196403
>Yet you never denied it until now
When was anything ever denied?
>You say that it's fine to be attracted to a person no matter how masculine that person is as long as that person possesses a pussy.
Shit that nobody explicitly said, ever.
>I call that out as gay.
You'd suck trap cock in a heartbeat with that logic.

>>196406
>When was anything ever denied?
<Tomboys don't have to be anywhere near the other end of that spectrum.
>Shit that nobody explicitly said, ever.
<Boys have a penis, girls have a vagina. Simple as.
<It makes no sense for you to imply that a woman might not be a woman when she has a fucking vagina.
<The latter isn't gay, because the latter has a vagina.
>You'd suck trap cock in a heartbeat with that logic.
<(Me:) And faggotry goes both ways, being attracted to appearance/behavior of the same sex, and being attracted to genitals of the same sex. Feels good to be a pure heterosexual.

>>196407
><(Me:) And faggotry goes both ways, being attracted to appearance/behavior of the same sex, and being attracted to genitals of the same sex. Feels good to be a pure heterosexual.
See >>196383

>>196408
You're trying to narrow the definition of gay because it personally benefits you, it gives you more safe territory that allows you to wear a "I'M STRAIGHT!! I'M STRAIGHT!!" badge.

bcf8122b6b84a6e52bee0bf04c191b2a469b2aba34b6aba2c881931f8e6fc6ec.png
[Hide] (4.7MB, 1110x1785) Reverse

>>196409
You are either the only person, or part of a tiny, tiny minority that pushes your completely ass-backwards logic.

I don't know where the idea that tomboys can't or won't be girly comes from, if you've ever actually met any of them you'd realize they're perfectly fine with wearing girly shit they're just more physically active than bimbos is the difference.

>>196423
>I don't know where the idea comes from
Gays trying to turn other people gay. It's how gays reproduce.

I don't know why fitness is conflated with fighting invaders...fitness makes sex more enjoyable, helps with chores/errands, and overall increases lifespan as well as quality of life. Wanting some flat ass skinny bitch or a lardass sounds awful, gimme some tomboy abs and a healthy uterus.

Professor_Nutbutter.jpg
[Hide] (29.9KB, 512x512) Reverse

>>196409
All 3D is gay, simple as.

>>196426
Before the invention of gus you probably weren't going to fight anyone off if you were skinny or a lardass, physical fitness = greater fighting potential this isn't some complicated leap in logic.

>>196439
>gus
lol *guns

I just want a woman who isn't a bitch, who has some semblance of brains, can speak her mind, isn't shallow and vain, is healthy, and wants to do cool shit with me.

>>196441
>wants to do cool shit with me
Uh oh, sounds like you're a closet gay! Only a tomboy (trans woman) would want to do that.

>>196441
Seems like >>196445 is right. You now have to suck dicks and take so much cum in your ass that your poop ends up having white streaks of cum in it, if you can even shit properly after all of those dicks you've taken in your ass.
Sorry. Those are the rules, according to a certain someone.

>>196445
>>196447
Oh man, it's so so over for me. Guess it's time to spread my cheeks because only a tomboy (male) is the only girl that would ever want to do cool shit and women never ever want to do cool shit.

>>196451
When did an 8chan meetup ever go that way?

7f4e3b085a03ba6d60fd4a7ce5b41eb1.jpg
[Hide] (15.5KB, 280x280) Reverse

My god this feels like a glow nigger trying desperately to swing the discussion to question our love of a particular type of women. 
Tomboy is just a woman who likes to do mainly dominated masculine activities while embracing their femininity. Thats it. It doesnt mean the person interested in them is a closet gay, in fact I would argue it dieters them further away from women, it doesnt mean the woman is a tranny or anything in between. 
You dont like them, be my guest. I can understand why you faggot glow niggers. Enjoy sucking your cut sigma cheese filled jew penises and dildos up your ass.

ac39299a642660ec8c9b315848eaf7a459377e3f9bcb9e45da79cc3ce1891379.png
[Hide] (19.4KB, 319x310) Reverse

Maybe different people just like different things.
You ever thought of that?

>>196508
>Maybe different people just like different things.
Yes, but I'm studying on whether one of these things is gay or not.
And the unwritten rule number 1 of all non-shithole imageboards is that homosexuality (FAGgotry) is the worst trait that a person can have.

>>196303
Arguetrannies cower at the thought of self-acceptance and doubtlessness.