/b/ - Random

Most "yuri" is dyke garbage so I'm not surprised.

>>188387 (OP) 
>The western web is dead.
And nothing of value was lost.

>>188390
Well, that's much more common in westoid slop. Which also probably has this stuff just for the LGBTP propaganda.

>the places i go to worship fictional homosexuals also worship real homosexuals its so over

>>188528
Yes? Because it's not good when people conflate idealized fiction with ugly reality? Would you like if a normal anime board worshiped women, or a lolicon board had actual pedos?

>>188535
>Would you like it if fags became superfags?
I think they should stop being fags in general.

facebook.png
[Hide] (5.6KB, 200x200) Reverse

>>188536
We get it, anyone who has interest in anything other that sportsball or beer is a "fag" to you.

I quit being a yurifag years ago because I read a very convincing post once that claimed that it's a gateway to becoming a tranny. I'm glad to hear that I haven't missed anything in the interim and things have completely gone down the shitter.
I wouldn't mind an angel's threesome, though.

>>188387 (OP) 
I make a board that is /lez/ - lesbian & yuri.
Anything relating to female homosexuality and exists within the bounds of us law is allowed.
Irl lesbians and yuri girls have a lot more in common than people want to acknowledge, often the refutation involves cherrypicking the examles in each category that allows them to falsely characterize them as being more distinct from each other than they actually are, ignoring the diversity of content within each  everything that one has, the other has in equal amounts.

>>188563
Well, if you are a tranny, I can see how you could like yuri/strongly female-focused stuff as a projection of your self-hate related to your sex. But if you aren't a tranny already, and don't devolve into hating men and can still appreciate things that have males in them, I don't think that that stuff should be harmful.

>>188565 ((( You )))

>>188563
I've jacked off to yuri ever since I was a teen and discovered hentai and I've still got my dick attached, aren't attracted to men nor have I ever crossdressed, maybe you're just weak minded and susceptible to the propaganda

Girls aren’t supposed to love other girls. It’s forbidden love! Why focus on girls that don’t want men anyways? They wouldn’t want you, they wouldn’t want me. I just don’t get it.

>>188563
>I read a very convincing post once that claimed that it's a gateway to becoming a tranny.
You either have autogynophilia or you don't. I'm not convinced that yuri/traps/futa/femdom/whatever can turn a person AGP. It can only activate it if it is already inside you.

Also AGP doesn't automatically mean tranny. Getting turned on by the idea of being dressed up and fucked like a girl doesn't mean a person wants to live life as a girl 24/7. That seems like an extreme case possibly with extra mental illness mixed in.

its-science.jpg
[Hide] (91.3KB, 910x512) Reverse

>>188563
The only anime that can troon someone out is Serial Experiments Lain.
Source: it's just a well known SCIENTIFIC fact

>>188617
What about zombieland? Isn’t that anime pretty faggy?

>>188605
>Why focus on girls that don’t want men anyways? They wouldn’t want you, they wouldn’t want me.
It's cute and you can empathize with the warm feelings. And no, it's not cucked because cucking requires a girl having been involved with you in the first place.

>>188618
I don't know what that is, but I looked it up and it does seem to have a tranny character, but it's kind of recent (2018) so this stuff should be expected to sometimes pop up.

>>188620
My Hero is also not immune to pozzing. How many faggots are there again?

>>188629
Well, it's not real anime, it's shounenshit AND ripping off westoid capeshit.

>>188631
Good point. I hope it has a REALLY SHITTY ENDING that makes the fans babyrage.

it's too much of a fantasy, and not really immersive - the relationships are forced and just there as convenience for fetish material

>>188551
If your interest is gooning to fagshit for 12 hours every day then you are a fag.

>>188601
>>188603
>>188606
Well, I didn't write it down, but it had something to do with the mental associations of two girls moaning with sex. I don't think I was ever that big into the stuff either, so it was pretty easy for me to quit cold turkey.

>>188617
Yeah, that checks out with everything I know about it.

>>188535
So scatfags are good as long as they don't eat shit irl then?

669febd112f46dbdafcc35629b35e576e1b53eb1821894868eb675b2514ff934.jpg
[Hide] (110.6KB, 1200x667) Reverse

>>188648
You again display your lack of imagination.
Now go on Xitter cry about lolicon being "pedoshit" and people "gooning 12 hours every day" to it being pedos.
>>188688
If you're worried about /x/ shitposts that much, then there's plenty of non-sexual yuri material, which is still very enjoyable. Which shouldn't contain "two girls moaning with sex".
>>188708
No, because scatshit (heh) is disgusting, but yuri is beautiful. Sorry if you're a "5" in the picture and can't imagine yuri as its own thing, separate from real life dykes.

>>188719
Women not attracted to men are mentally ill and must be treated or euthanized, and so should you for glorifying mental illness.

>>188719
>if you think fags who act like fags are fags then you have no imagination
>now cry on fagsite about fagshit being fagshit and fags gooning to fagshit being fags
>if you are worried about fagshit turning you into a fag there is plenty of tame fagshit material, which is very enjoyable if you are a fag. which shouldn't contain two fags moaning with fagsex
>fagshit is disgusting. but fagshit is beautiful. sorry if you're a 0 on the kinsey scale and can't imagine fagshit as its own seperate thing from fagshit
There is no faggot faggier than you, niggerfaggot.

>>188719
>yuri without sex
But what's the point then?

>>188720
Must be bleak having terminal aphantasia and only being able to think about the ugly real world.
>>188721
This is an English board. Sorry if you're a wetback who only knows 20 English words (of which fag is your favorite one).
>>188724
It's cute and you can empathize with the warm feelings. If anything, I appreciate the romantic aspect of yuri more than the sexual one, because at least to me sex without a dick is not as interesting.

>>188731
It was the opposite for me. Girls are cute and hot, so two of them going at each other was cute and hot. But romance is just silly - what's romantic about a sterile relationship?

>>188731
The fact that your only arguments thus far were personal attacks at self-invented strawmen proves that you have no argument.

>>188732
You may say it's sterile, but I think it's just a different flavor (also the "girls are cute, so two of them are cute" aspect still applies). But I also enjoy "normal" romance stories, it shouldn't be mutually exclusive.
>>188736
>fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag fag
>WAAAAAH stop ATTACKING me, please make better arguments!!!!!!!!

>>188765
No, sterile as in they can't physically have kids.

>>188770
That admittedly is mediocre, and why those stories work better with child/teenage characters, almost in a vacuum. Though I also prefer stories with young characters for normal romance and basically any other genre.

That's exactly what yuri means.

>>188765
I have not called you a fag. I have only called you a fag worshipper because you started this thread with telling everyone you love worshipping faggots.
Thus far your refutal was:
>you better imagine yourself being wrong, or else you're stupid, mkay?

>>188806
No, because "gay"/"lesbian" are words used for disgusting 3DPD homosexuals, and while yuri is about homosexual girls, it feels completely different. But people like the ones I was complaining about are corrupting it to turn it into just a 2D version of 3DPD homosexuality.
>>188807
And you cannot stop conflating real world degeneracy with idealized fiction. You are essentially like the people I was complaining about, other than being against this stuff.

>>188808
Yes. Idealized fictional degeneracy. Like traps and futa and TSF and furries, etc.
Do you also think that traps or futanari aren't gay, or that furries aren't zoophiles? Because you're performing exactly the same mental gymnastics, just for a different brand of homosexual.
And defending it in exactly the same way, too: by repeating "[homosexuals i like] aren't gay" a thousand times, coated in different strawmanned insults.

>>188860
Because yuri (not corrupted to be a bootleg version of real world dykes) is not disgusting, while those things you mentioned are. Simple as.
It's hard to keep on arguing, it's like if you were trying to prove that chocolate ice cream is the same thing as dog shit.

>>188860
False equivalence nonsense.
>traps or futanari
These aren't even remotely the same.
>just for a different brand of homosexual
You are comparing apples and oranges.

ca4d5a0abdcddc022cd4a90acf9da6c2635996b629bc08755683077ccc008962.png
[Hide] (1.7MB, 1072x1500) Reverse

0a0a408ea62edb85b0cf4d25ee5721eeff875b81b4468b326d15fa6aa3eaef43.png
[Hide] (2MB, 1061x1500) Reverse

7038b36453d48f95fda7528254cac7a7a6b0c8aa906b2adf3fd901969eb68320.png
[Hide] (1.7MB, 1062x1500) Reverse

Spoiler File
(358.7KB, 612x408) Reverse

Spoiler File
(1.6MB, 1200x599) Reverse

You are essentially trying to say that pics 1~3 are the same thing as 4~5. There's no point in arguing, you just have a fucked up perception.

30a45215b4e27b01673d018538cb4710e54c125e948782f6f49e8cf6ee735b66.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 1920x1080) Reverse

>>188866
>faggotry isn't faggotry
Do your parents know you suck dicks?

>>188872
Do your parents know you obsessively sniffed glue every day when you were in elementary school?

>>188864
It's you who is arguing that eating calcinated dog shit is okay, because it's now white and hard and doesn't stink as bad anymore (according to yourself). And that it's totally different from eating human shit because that doesn't become "not gross" after you leave it in the sun.

>>188866
All people in these images are either mentally ill or actively trying to be/pass as mentally ill.
The only reason you could argue that the first three are any better in their contents is that women naturally tend to get stupid shit into their heads when they don't have a man to guide them. So you could say these pictures are only depicting a self-imposed mental illness in the making (wow, much better).
But you know full well that these images exist for the sole purpose of glorifying female mental illness.

>>188864
>Because gay sex is not disgusting, while gay sex is.
>>188865
True equivalence facts.
Yurifags are no better than yaoiniggers.

>>188875
>uhhhhhhh you sniff glue hehehehhe
>no I don't have an argument, lesbians are totally different from homosexual men
Keep sucking on that LGBTBBQHH dick, fag.

>>188872
>watching yuri means you suck penis
Where the fuck is the logic? It makes sense for >>188875 to accuse you of sniffing glue.
>>188880
>Because gay sex is not disgusting, while gay sex is.
Again with this false equivalence nonsense.
You cannot compare male-male anal sex (damages the rectum, leads to prolapses, permanent incontinence, colorectal cancer, taking a poz load in the ass is the only sexual act where the risk of contracting HIV is higher than 1 percent, outside of blood transfusion of infected blood) to tribadism, assuming they don't bother involving toys, and even if they did, why the fuck would they ever insert anything in their asses when they've got vaginas?
<lol frottage/docking/other non-penetrative male-male sex
You know very well that they never do that stuff exclusively and only consider it to be foreplay.
>>188881
>no I don't have an argument
<youre the one who doesnt have an argument, not me

>>188882
>Where the fuck is the logic? 
You're supporting faggotry and it's expansion. 
><youre the one who doesnt have an argument, not me
>no u
kys fag lover.

>>188905
>You're supporting faggotry and it's expansion.
<I consumed a piece of yuri media and now I'm helplessly sucking dicks at the Pride Parade like a vacuum cleaner in front of children and my intestines are sticking out 2 feet out of my ass because watching yuri (women) makes you want to suck dicks (male) somehow.
Slippery slope, on top of being nonsensical.
You are using the same logic as trannies refusing to read Harry Potter because Rowling spoke out against trannies forcing their way into women-only spaces.

>>188866
Also, very interesting how you used fictional femfags, but real malefags and furtrannies to illustrate your point about how only the former is made okay by being fictional.

>>188913
Here's a fictional example if you want it so much.

>>188914
Great.
Now you can start explaining how glorification of fictional mentally ill animals is better than glorification of fictional mentally ill women, and eventually you might construct an actual argument.

>>188913
>Also, very interesting how you used fictional femfags
>how only the former is made okay by being fictional
That's the only thing being discussed, you false equivalence spamming faggot.
You're the one constantly bringing in unrelated things.
>>188915
>and eventually you might construct an actual argument
<as per my arbitrary standards

>>188882
>You cannot compare male-male anal sex (damages the rectum, leads to prolapses, permanent incontinence, colorectal cancer, taking a poz load in the ass is the only sexual act where the risk of contracting HIV is higher than 1 percent, outside of blood transfusion of infected blood) to tribadism, assuming they don't bother involving toys, and even if they did, why the fuck would they ever insert anything in their asses when they've got vaginas?
<it's not good when people conflate idealized fiction with ugly reality
The real life consequences of homosexuality do not exist in idealized fiction so your point is meaningless.
>You know very well that they never do that stuff exclusively and only consider it to be foreplay.
Why are you talking about real life homosexuality? This is about drawings, which have no will of their own. AI can make an infinite amount of non-penetrative gay sex pictures.

>>188390
Tranny, is always ugly trannies who love yuri shit.

>>188994
>The real life consequences of homosexuality do not exist in idealized fiction so your point is meaningless.
So then quit bringing it up as a talking point.
<still thinking that male and female homosexuality are the same thing
lol
>Why are you talking about real life homosexuality?
Why are you talking about it in the first place, faggot?
If you aren't that faggot, then it's because he keeps bringing it up.

d307e189e5439c6dad2ef73556a0adcf7fdad9f229bb282530e715e16ed24bb1.png
[Hide] (285.4KB, 421x400) Reverse

The anti-yuri nigger is a gender equality SJW because he says that male homosexuality and female homosexuality are the exact same thing, which can only be true if you consider males and females to be the exact same thing.

>>189007
You are yet to explain why "idealized" male and female homosexuality are meaningfully different.
>Why are you talking about it in the first place, faggot?
Why is it when people compare yuri to yaoi you end up defending real life lesbianism?
>>189038
Drawings are not people. Both types of drawn homosexuality are a negative influence.

>>189039
>why "idealized" male and female homosexuality are meaningfully different
Because male homosexuality is unpleasant to heterosexual males in any form, while female homosexuality can be executed well. There's no super rational 999IQ deconstructive intellectual academic enlightened deep explanation, it's just some things being inherently disgusting and not others. Maybe to people who don't have damaged brains, unlike you.
>are a negative influence.
To whom? "Oh no I saw a drawing of two girls kissing each other, now I'm sure going to suck dicks" -- definitely not me. And probably not anyone else on this earth either. Maybe other than you, projecting faggot.

>>189041
your argument amounts to "if you don't like spiders then you secretly want to fuck them"

>>189696
Point me to where, fucking retard. Did you just write this post to flash your high iq spider analogy?

>high iq spider analogy
you have to be 18 to post here

>>189712
Pretty sure any stupid child can argue about cartoons.

>>189716
What about a smart child?

>>188808
"Dirty pair" (1985) and "You're under arrest!" (1996) both have real live surgery trannies and dirty pair had a boy marry a tranny. I know this because I watched them. (not fully though)
https://www.cbr.com/80s-sci-fi-anime-dirty-pair-transgender/

The line is between fictional gays and real gays is very thin and fades easily.
Dykes that don't have a male lover are just dykes in the end. They can't have children together. They aren't complete.
They are both women and women can't do anything themselves. It's all meaningless and caused by mental illness.
I can't even think of much anime that has dykes. Yes that one pink haired pedo dyke in OP but other than that I can't think of any.

And the dyke in OP is officially mentally ill. Even in the fictional world.

>>189719
Smart children don't argue, they call you a retard and refuse to engage you in any meaningful way.

d5799f89b60abdc3c564bfd0d0597a10abee7a9b316ee872814b8129679978dd.gif
[Hide] (529.2KB, 444x250) Reverse

>>189722
Retard.

>>189720
What the actual fuck? There was faggot shit in anime way back when? For what purpose?

>>189712
I was being sarcastic. I don't think that expression/analogy is either particularly bad or particularly super-intellectual, though I like it, but it was out of place.
>>189720
>>189725
>oh my science, 2 anime out of (dozens of?) thousands have tranny shit, the entire medium is corrupted
>back to watching trooniggerflix, everyone
>>189721
Shallow reddit analysis

>>189720
>pedo
PS: Nice usage of this word in the context of 2D, redditroonormalfag

>>189720
>"Dirty pair" (1985) and "You're under arrest!" (1996)
Cherrypicking as fuck.
Somehow you're not even mentioning Ranma 1/2. I guess genderbending doesn't count to you? But that wouldn't explain why you'd probably throw a shitfit over Onii-chan wa Oshimai.
>The line is between fictional gays and real gays is very thin and fades easily.
<I still cannot distinguish between reality and fiction.

>>189725
Sick fucks have always existed. Sometimes they get the pilot seat.

>>189730
>Somehow you're not even mentioning Ranma 1/2. I guess genderbending doesn't count to you?
NTA, but while I think it's kind of gay to be attracted to a genderbent character, I don't think genderbending is particularly objectionable by itself if it's something more magical and not for tranny propaganda. Though I'd say that Onii-chan wa Oshimai is more questionable than something like Ranma ½ because the former is clearly more fetishistic in nature while the latter is more comedic.

>>189727
That's not what I said. I was simply horrified there was shit like that back then.

skinneroutoftouch.jpg
[Hide] (40.3KB, 500x534) Reverse

Stop with the shitfit bumping your stupid ass threads and accept that if everyone is disagreeing with you in damn near every thread then you yourself likely have the problem.
Luckily I can just hide your threads and move on with my life.
My stupid ass opinions may not be any better than yours but at least I don't act like a spoiled bitch that demands people bow to my supposed (actually non-existent) intellectual superiority.