>>193948
>I want to control you and your life
No? I literally said that it shouldn't be enforced by law.
>even when I can't see you and literally nothing you do has any direct or indirect effect on me
If it's 100% secret there's no problem, but the problem is that druggies, homos, etc, end up indirectly causing harm, and even if they don't, just leaking out the fact that you do lowly things like that is bad enough because it's cringe.
>no I will not explain how the evil hweed smoke you did hurt my peepee
Aside from the fact that it's cringe, if you smoke weed around others you're contaminating them, and also weed smokers behave in weird ways which (aside from creating cringe situations), can bother others in a noticeable way or even harm them. And of course, they're also harming themselves, and by being open about it without being heavily shamed, they're doing mini-propaganda for others to do it and harm at least themselves.
>>193970
I literally said that none of this should be enforced by the government, and that it should be more of an informal societal thing.