/b/ - Random

I have nothing better going on. What have you discovered, OP?

The world after mass market accessible time travel would be insane.

- post scarcity bc we could just export resources and technology to the past.

- world sustainability becomes infinite bc we just migrate to the past.

- time clones everywhere, many identical copies of everybody at every age.

- tme travel will be the end of human technological progress bc everyones bringing the information of the future to the past.

- any project we begin can be fast tracked by sending copies of our partially completed work to the past as we go.

- im guessing we'd have multiple timelines as this is the only way a world where people can travel back in time the way they could travel anywhere on earth could conceivably work. So no restrictions on what you could do with your travels to the past.

- also guessing that wed have ftl travel a well since anyone who's looked into the science knows that ftl and time travel would likely emerge from the same technological development.

>>186787 (OP) 
>On cuckchan /sci/ there are a bunch of aging milennials talking about becoming more youthful and extending their lives
Isn't that because they're ingesting dubious chemicals?
Like the Light Yagami avatarfag that took intranasal deferoxamine, only to end up brain damaged?

>>186820
Travel forwards in time would cause you to skip a part of your own timeline, but travel backwards places you into a different timeline that is mostly identical to the one you had come from (the only differences being your time-travelling selves' presence in the past, and every future event that results from it), with no way of ever returning to the timeline you had left behind when you went back in time (but from your perspective it is practically the case that you had gone back in time).

OP could go back in time, become a catholic priest, and be the one who made his younger self gay by molesting him.

>>186821
/sci/ has a bunch of oldfags who are terrified of getting old. What they are doing is the autistic equivalent of having the midlife crisis. They are panicking but with a thin veneer of intellectual cope.

The millenials had failed, the revolution they had all expected never came because they truly had no clue what they were doing, their strategies equated to just wasting their time for nothing. Now when the happening happens and the shtf they will be too damn old and infirm to be the hero protags they had longed to be. Their chance to be the ones who made history is gone. They are in denial.

Time travel is a cringey topic for autistic nerds that belongs on reddit. Do not respond to this post,  do not bring up this subject again.

>>186828
Suck my nuts.

c711eade6643091e96b36624b8f8b113b22a941bfff8eb115480203ad0f63fdd.png
[Hide] (3.4MB, 1031x1556) Reverse

1490c10129f1b07ebf1f24fde951bec65cae94bb6bce08f3939b9e3c31733856.png
[Hide] (3.7MB, 1296x2048) Reverse

>>186828
Fuck you.

>>186820
>something for nothing would be great
Look, I just saw a pig fly.

adfbdcb10f5726c074eb5adff3d54377cc5f8bb78154731651d42a531f632424.png
[Hide] (388.8KB, 1190x906) Reverse

>>186865

time travel to the past is impossible, because time doesn't exist, is bound by gravity.

OP should research shit instead of bitching about no research going on

Time traveler here. 
This shit sucks so much we had to isolate timelines where interfering is prohibited

>>186865
Its not something for nothing, we would be taking from the future of one timeline and transporting to the past of another.

>>186877
Pure capping.

There's literally no risks involved with time travel to the past.

The world doesn't cater to the human need for dramatic tension.

>>186832
Only weak faggots want to return to the past, only the retards with low time preference want to see the future in advance.

A real man lives his life as God intended him to: taking it one day at a time where every new day is faced without a spoiler warning. 

A real man accepts his past as it was, and strives to improve things within the wake of previous events, he does not cry out for a redo like some savescumming sperg who fears his mistakes.

>>187051
Molest church boys in the future christcucked linear time fag

>>187085
Why is the postal dude in 1940s Canada?

Time travel may be possible. Publicly available time travel ain't ever gonna happen.
>>186820
If single-timeline time travel was possible then we'd probably already be living in a post-time travel world.

4fdc789f263c668efcc56705a798b8d92986e217b6c65f94f56ecc8feb47677f.jpeg
[Hide] (6.5KB, 260x194) Reverse

>>187085
>proven by NTV in Rashka
Nah stupid

>>187085
Would you sign my petition?

>>187119
There cannot be a single timeline if it were possible for things to go back in time. Backwards time travel is possible, therefore we must exist in a multiverse with multiple timelines, at the very least. If people went back in time just to attend the lameass convention for time travellers that Stephen Hawking had set up, they would arrive in a timeline separate from this one, where they hadnt shown up. The cripples' little experiment was nothing but an attention-whoring publicity stunt. Most people are too retarded or brainwashed by the conventions of jew media to comprehend how going back in time would work (the way it MUST work, the ONLY way that it could work).

>>187086
If it is indeed the postal dude in pic, I'd bet you my left nut that even he doesnt have a clue what he's doing there.

Zool.png
[Hide] (7.6KB, 320x256) Reverse

In 1992
> Hey everyone is putting cutesy furry mascots in their console games, we need to also or we'll lose the market!
> chooses a fucking NINJA ANT as their mascot
> plasters the levels with ads for a spanish lollipop company (wtf?)
> Press "Up" on joystick to jump, LOL (everyone else by that time already has 3 or more button gamepads)
> Two years later Commodore files for bankruptcy, leaving the path clear for complete domination of Bill Gates.
If I had a time machine, I'd go kick someone's asses!

Lets talk about how traveling through time to the past, or just sending things into the past could be achieved.
Not the smoothbrained conversation about logical paradoxes of causality, or speculating about why we havent met visitors from the future yet.
I want a real conversation about the actual science and engineering of moving people, objects, or information backwards in time.

>>188007
Let's talk about warp drives, wormholes, dimensions above the third, etc.

>I want a real conversation about the actual science and engineering
Are you lost or something? You forgot where you are?

>>187237

>therefore we must exist in a multiverse with multiple timelines
marvel is gay and putting the multiverse in story is the biggest and most annoying cop out in all of literature because the writers can fuck up as many universes it and likes and can continue writing completely destroying the story and the plot

>>188019
Its also the way the world has to be if going back in time were possible. This is inescapably true.

Also >bringing up hollyjew capeshit in a discussion on time travel science irl.

>>188008
A place with smart individuals pretending to be retarded?

>>188106
Personally, i don't even need to pretend

bumo...

>>188105
It makes sense to being up retarded fantasy when discussing retarded fantasy.

Can we rez this thread plz?

>>186787 (OP) 
Only travel forwards is possible and yes you can do it 'faster' by traveling close to the speed of light. Do it faggot.

>>195136
Why ia travel backwards impossible? 
FYI Multiple timelines means causal paradoxes aren't an obstacle.

This is true I am a time traveller from the year 2040 and OP is still a massive faggot

f1cbd4121ac578e890745434e52502cd87cca198b5a5cfc4b9976043ab9ad421.jpg
[Hide] (76.1KB, 563x422) Reverse

>>195139
>multi universes 
Is retarded so I'm ignoring it. That's like saying you are John Connor and meant to be destroyed by your own fake father's cock as the original John cannot be John unless the entire universe planned his birth, of which, you know, sounds like Jaysus of which is super fucking all around gay. You're in the timelien where you were NOT meanat to travel time even if you think it's out there, you are here  in THIS timelilne ergo it's a gay option, many universes, parraLEL. 

So ignoring that:

Because of how cause and effect work. Temporal paradoxes and all. "Causality". Even science fiction warns about time travel. Even if it were possible you'd probably end up glitching the universe to where cause and effect no longer meant anything, a world of chaos. 

But yeah, say you can switch universes, what if you end up in hell accidentally? Random universe here we come! NIce experiment. Fuck that. Not that I think it's real, I think that 'everything is possible' bullshit is a human error personally. They hate feeling trapped and want to believe in indeed heaven and shit, a second chance, etc, without regard to the fact that infinite hell also resides there.

>>195162
>travel to 100 years ago
>trying to tell post Queen Victorian era people to chill 
>make political backlash instead
>it's even worse
Butterfly effect. At least kill Queen Victoria, you gotta go back further. She created a sort of bullshit anti-fun logic that got hookers and shit banned over time. 
>try to kill her
>get called insane and locked up
<Oh wait...

The atoms you're made of already existed in the past, to move back in time you'd remove those atoms from current time (effectively destroying them), and you'd have duplicated atoms existing in the past, it doesn't work.

>>195186
What you mean to get at is that the universe cannot have something newly made into it even if it's newly you? In stargate they have people go out of phase over having two at once in one episode, made me roll my eyes personally. I imagine if something like that is true it'd be more like Fringe and the cause and effect would glitch but rather than destroy the universe it'd just fuck up everything until life cannot exist, but because they did in the past it'd be a chaotic nightmare as that probably won't change so you'd get just what you asked for and like a dumb ass only the past would function properly so you'd have to keep running away to the past as you destroyed the future, for one cannot have a future without cause, of which travel to the past destroys cause, thus destroying the effect, the effect being the future.  Like running up a curtain as it unravels, making it worse and worse as you pull on the strings as you go further and further back in time, eventually to the point where you cannot survive in the atmosphere and the dino laughs at your gay ass and then moves on with it's life after the universe finally stops glitching becuase you deleted all of humanity due to your petulant desires.

>>195186
Conservation of energy is preserved if you take the entire multiverse into account as ira own closed system, what you are removing from one timeline is being removed from another. The total sum of energy remains the same. If it's at all possible to go back in time then the multiverse must exist because all other solutions fail upon consideration; for example a chronological protection conjecture inevitably requires the breaking of laws of physics to preserve temporal causality. Its not a serious proposal for how going back in time wouldn't produce a paradoxical reality.