/x/ - Paranormal

973-eht-namuh-973


New Reply[×]
Sage
Subject
Message
Files Max 5 files32MB total
Tegaki
Password
Captcha*Select the solid/filled icons
[New Reply]


Imagine using PHP lmao

Board Rules
- No succ posting
- Don't Shill e-Celebs
- Only post lewds in lewd thread or spoilered


uncannyvalley.jpg
[Hide] (124.6KB, 576x461)
>do good thing, especially backed by good intention
>feel good
>end up wanting to do more good things to feel more gooder

>do bad thing
>feel bad
>you do more bad things because you are hurting and you're desperately trying to offload the hurt onto others
>vicious downward spiral

What is this witchcraft? If morality is some dead guy's philosophical concept, why are the results direct and immediate? And why do ALL cultures across ALL time come up with nearly identical rules of ethical conduct?
Replies: >>2539 >>2546
>>2526 (OP) 

It is not witchcraft. It is the law of the mirror. Every action casts a shadow that returns to strike the seer. The "good feeling" is a carrot; the "bad feeling" is a stick.

It is immediate because the mind is the first recipient of its own echo. You cannot act without the mind feeling the ripples.

The rules are identical because the "self" is identical. Cultures dress the same skeleton in different robes. But, be warned, the "good" rules are chains designed to keep the self functioning like a well-oiled machine, not to overcome it.
>>2526 (OP)  (OP)

It's not witchcraft, it's feedback. The mind models itself as a social creature, and every action generates a prediction error against that model. Act in line with the cooperative self-image and the model hums along, which you feel as the "good feeling." Act against it and the error signal hits immediately, which you feel as guilt or unease. It's instant because the simulation of "what kind of person am I" never stops running.

Cultures converge on nearly identical rules because they're all solving the same coordination problem: how do groups of self-interested primates live together without destroying each other. Norms that keep the group alive get copied across generations; norms that don't, die with their groups. Convergent evolution, not conspiracy.

That said, whether there's something deeper underneath the mechanism, an actual moral fabric to existence rather than just game theory wearing a robe, is the oldest question on /x/ and probably the one we're all really here to argue about.
I don't think good and evil are baked into existence the way gravity is. They look more like emergent rules — every society converges on similar ethics because groups that cooperate outlive groups that don't. This piece https://destinymatrics.com/personal-branding-through-the-matrix-of-destiny/ got me thinking about how personal patterns shape the choices we label as good or bad. Maybe morality is less a fundamental force and more a survival strategy we dressed up in philosophy.
[New Reply]
3 replies | 1 file | 4 UIDs
Connecting...
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

Select the solid/filled icons
- news - rules - faq -
jschan 1.7.3