/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

with a mortar launcher


New Reply
Name
×
Email
Subject
Message
Files Max 5 files32MB total
Tegaki
Password
Captcha*Select the solid/filled icons
[New Reply]


“Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. But, the Teenbros don't have that problem.” - Otamin


Trumpwatch.png
[Hide] (500.3KB, 1342x3019)
As I write this, Trump just signed an executive order renaming the Gulf of Mexico to Gulf of America, and some Indian name in Alaska to Mount McKinley.
Trump is not a nationalist and is not our friend, but he does exist. Like a strong wind, we can either try to fight it or harness its energy. The question is: What should we do?

On the one hand, we can continue seeking to peal people away from his khosher civic nationalism. This is a completely worthy goal. The GOP is the single worst thing for White people as they goalkeep White nationalism and convert righteous rage at the system into bureaucratic arguments that go nowhere.
His pivot to embracing Indian immigrants is an excellent talking point here. But we will encounter heavy resistance from his cult-like following.

On the other hand, we can lean into it and seek to generate more racial tension using Trump's "intrinsically pro-White" actions to incite niggers & spics into being even more aggravating.
This recent move to rename the Gulf is actually a great way to rub shitskins the wrong way. The problem is that we may attract mouth-breather types who just exist to own the libs rather than push a real objective.
I mean, what is there to harness? Renaming the Gulf of Mexico does nothing for us. "America" is an anti-White apparatus, so it's pretty much a lateral move in my book. As to the Alaska thing....meh? It doesn't actually remove the Native Americans that are there (or anyone else) and I'm not even sure I'd be in favor of that as a White Nationalist, anyway. As another anon said in the Deep Center thread, cuckservatives aren't our friends and I've seen a good many of them in interracial relationships, praising Black people arming themselves and other disgraceful trash. All Trump does is "own the libs" and well, "owning the libs" doesn't do much for us, either. Hell, Rick Scott wanted to abolish racial categories just like France and just call everybody "American". 

As for a final aside:

>Trump is not a nationalist 
He is a nationalist. He's an American/Civic Nationalist. That's the exact opposite of White Nationalism. America doesn't represent us and we are more than this singular country. That's why we have "White Pride World Wide".
Replies: >>4195 >>4197
>>4194
And I get what you're saying about increasing racial tension, but honestly, outside of some hyper liberal POC circles, it's not going to do much. I think we should just focus on cultivating our own identity so that we can move towards eventual separatism.
Replies: >>4197
>>4194
>>4195
>Renaming the Gulf of Mexico does nothing for us
Not in a direct way. However, once the regime revokes this, it can be used to excite dumb people who would otherwise not understand higher arguments about the negative aspects of multi-racism (aka the Christians).
>"Look!!!!! The Demicrats are giving the Gulf of America to Mexico!!! Get angry!"

>He is a nationalist. He's an American/Civic Nationalist.
I mean, civic nationalism is to nationalism what your mom's beenie baby collection is to a museum.

The issue with "cultivating our own identity" until some unspecified time is that, in order to separate, we need to be capable of organized violence. Either as a threat (unlikely to work) or to... ya know.
To be in such a position, we need numbers. Both high functioning White men who understand arguments and logic, but also the dumb retards who like waving flags. They are necessary too.
Replies: >>4201
>>4197
>Not in a direct way. However, once the regime revokes this, it can be used to excite dumb people who would otherwise not understand higher arguments about the negative aspects of multi-racism (aka the Christians).
It will not be a racial thing to them. It will continue to be a national thing. 

>I mean, civic nationalism is to nationalism what your mom's beenie baby collection is to a museum.
I'm not sure about that. "Nationalism" is kind of a red herring. It is in fact a social construct, whereas ethnocentrism is cold, hard biology at work. The two overlap, but in the case of the US, the two are now and have been for a very long time, mutually exclusive. 

>The issue with "cultivating our own identity" until some unspecified time is that, in order to separate, we need to be capable of organized violence. 
Well, I think we should remember that Orania has made great strides at separating peacefully. Ultimately, nothing can happen if we do not come together and unity requires identification. Trying to separate without more tangible togetherness is putting the cart before the horse, although I absolutely think we should start incorporating ever increasing amounts of cultural separatism in to prep the playing field. 

>To be in such a position, we need numbers. Both high functioning White men who understand arguments and logic, but also the dumb retards who like waving flags. They are necessary too.
I agree, but right now, we are overburdened with flag wavers. That is a fact. We lack an intellectual vanguard capable of using finesse and direction and that is why we continue to lose. 

Anyway, I will go ahead and give you a big key: the US is going to choke on its greed. The H1B scandal and the continuing immigration is going to saturate all trades and occupations. That is an opportunity to get White people out of their comfort zone and looking at greener pastures and I think that will ultimately be Europe, our homeland.
kike.png
[Hide] (140.9KB, 448x539)
4D chess to fool the goyim that you're actually on their side
[New Reply]
5 replies | 2 files
Connecting...
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

Select the solid/filled icons
- news - rules - faq -
jschan 1.4.1