>>16203
Have you ever heard of the great Cuban paradise?
We should really take a look at Castro's lifestyle once he jammed his fat hairy arse in Cuba's power seat.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/fidel-castros-amassed-massive-fortune-142104351.html?_guc_consent_skip=1786183498
https://www.forbes.com/sites/keithflamer/2016/11/26/10-surprises-about-castros-extravagant-life/
https://www.realclearhistory.com/2021/11/25/castros_life_was_extravagant_-_and_hypocritical_805109.html
>Forbes Magazine, perhaps the news outlet best-known for tracking the net worth of wealthy individuals, made international waves in 2006 when it listed Castro among the richest world leaders. Despite being the leader of a communist country, the magazine pegged Castro's wealth at $900 million a decade ago. A large portion of that staggering wealth reportedly came from the Cuban leader wielding control over state-backed interests, including a convention center, a pharmaceuticals company and a retail chain.
>Castro, of course, denied the reports of his massive wealth. But Forbes wrote at the time that "former Cuban officials insist Castro, who travels exclusively in a fleet of black Mercedes, has skimmed profits from these outfits for years."
>In a country where the average monthly wage is just $20 and where food reportedly often remains scarce, Castro lived a life of luxury. Juan Reinaldo Sanchez, a longtime Castro bodyguard, wrote a 2014 book detailing the leader's cozy existence, reported Australia's News Corp. Sanchez pegged Castro's net worth at $168 million, while revealing the leader's favorite luxuries, such as a private island, lavish spear-fishing expeditions and trips on a 85-foot yacht.
>But perhaps the most stunning sign of Castro's true wealth was his compound, known as Punto Cero or Point Zero. While the leader reportedly had a number of other properties, Punta Cero was his lavish residence shrouded in secrecy, details leaking out slowly over the years. The property required four gardeners, had two chefs, six greenhouses, and, somewhat oddly, a dairy cow for each member of the Castro family, according to Sanchez's book.
>Castro, meanwhile, long claimed very few assets, saying he took only a small salary and had just a fisherman's cottage off the coast.
That money surely wasn't lost on everybody.
https://medium.com/@leibowitt/of-course-fidel-castro-is-justin-trudeaus-dad-nobody-has-debunked-anything-4db6fc8a9042
https://www.winterwatch.net/2026/01/was-fidel-castro-justin-trudeaus-daddy/ (you may want to ignore the cringe bits)
Some comments:
>So, now I am wondering who are the fathers of the younger brothers, Michel and Alexander ? If Pierre who apparently couldn't have kids, is not the biological father.
>I suspected that Michel wanted out of the sht-show... https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/03/01/02/10438066-6758989-image-m-57_1551408650389.jpg
>I think Pierre pulled some strings to fake the avalanche skiing accident where Michel's body was never found.
"Dad... You are my dad, aren't you? I want out of your political sht-show of devasating Canada into a 3rd world country and selling out to world government."
>"Okay... son? We masons will arrange a new name and your escape from the public eye. You're a good one."
Haaa! Great analyses Karen, are you married?
>The photos are so compelling. What I see is that Justin inherited his mother's wide-set, light colored eyes, but almost every other feature is the same as Castro's. The nose, mouth, and chin (dimple) are identical. Look at Justin's tall, well-proportioned build.
>Then, look at pictures of Pierre, who looks like a weak-chinned weasel. I can't pick out even one feature that Justin and Pierre have in common.
>Just a correction: according to the -always precise- nerds from celebheights, Castro wasn't 6'3 (1.90m) but 6'1 (1.85m). Yeah, having 3inches on her husband might have made some difference, but it's not relevant when it comes to the massive Ted K.
>Why would it be necessary to conceal the name of the island after the Trudeaus had already visited?
>Two reasons:
>First, because that island was Cuba.
>Second, because although the island wasn't Cuba, Castro was there at the same time.
>Question: Where was Castro during this time period? Was he known to have not been in Cuba, or were his whereabouts unknown at the time (and presumably still unknown)? Can he be definitively placed on any of the islands visited by the Trudeaus? (The story that they were at another, unspecified, island could be a ruse.)
>1. Note 20 in the Wikipedia article cites another April 16, 1971 , report from The Ottawa Journal, from Port of Spain, Trinidad. It says, "The Trudeaus visited Barbados, and spent a day swimming off Bequia, a tiny island in the Grenadines, and nearby islets while they visited St. Vincent Monday." That Monday was the same Monday April 12 which the Tuesday April 13 report said, " Prime Minister Trudeau and his wife left here Monday by chartered plane on a quick sidetrip to an unidentified nearby-island." That report came in the middle of their holiday and for "security" the destination was "unidentified". The later report stated Trudeau had lunch with the PM of Trinidad & Tobago, and there was no secret about that.
>From the two news clippings it appears they had arrived in Barbados on Thurday April 8, spent Monday April 12 visiting St. Vincent, Bequia and smaller islets in the Grenadines, and arrived in Tobago on Tuesday April 13. Pierre had a luncheon date on Trinidad on Thursday April 15. The couple were due back in Ottawa by Sunday April 18.
>They might not have had any time for a Cuban stop-over on the way home, but how about on the outbound flight? Do we know where they arrived to Barbados FROM?
>A direct flight from Ottawa to Barbados is 2,146 miles, mostly over water with only Bermuda along the route until near the destination. It is possible the journey was made using one of three Lockheed L-1329 Jetstar 6 executive jets, which had a maximum range of 2,645 mi (4,255 km). For Instrument Flight Rules contingencies it is most probable that in 1971 their journey took them from Ottawa over Miami or Cuba, then to Barbados, and not direct. Weather could have necessitated a stop-over on either the outbound or return leg.
>2. When was Margaret Trudeau's first child conceived? The "normal" human pregnancy duration of 40 weeks from LMP (Last Menstrual Period) includes two weeks before ovulation. So a normal gestation is 38 weeks, hardly ever two weeks "over due" for 40 weeks, and if less than 34 weeks "premature" and requiring some extra attention. The Ottawa Citizen reported the birth weight as "six pounds nine ounce[s]", which isn't small but certainly not large, and quoted the Prime Minister as saying the "birth was 'an easy one' for his wife, with no complications."
>Pregnancy can occur from unprotected intercourse up to five days before until the day after ovulation. Libido tends to be highest around ovulation.
>Counting back 40 weeks from December 25 lands on March 20, about three weeks after the wedding, however a "two-week overdue" baby is usually bigger, and the labour more difficult. If ovulation occured on April 4th a "textbook" term birth would occur 38 weeks later, on December 25th. About half of babies are born after their "due date" and the other half before.
>Conception during a Cuban stop-over on April 7th could result if ovulation occured anywhere between April 6 and 12th. The child would be a couple days to one week early on December 25th. Conception during a Cuban stop-over on April 16th or 17th could result if ovulation occured between April 15th and the 21st. A child born on December 25th would be 12-17 days "early". So the dates certainly match up, though conception could just as plausibly have occurred any time during the trip. The "unidentified" island bit is a red herring though.
The usual dumb dumb:
>>LOL, the crux of your argument hangs on this trip to an unidentified nearby island when they were in the area of Barbados, Tobago, St. Vincent & the Grenadines. A simple look at a map shows how ridiculous that is. Cuba is over 1000 miles from Barbados. For your story to be true, they would have to have taken a 1000+ mile side trip to Cuba in the middle of their honeymoon so Margaret could bang Fidel Castro (who they knew, how?) and then they took another 1000+ mile trip back to the area of the other islands to finish the trip. Seems plausible. You offer no actual evidence that they went to Cuba during this trip, and your entire theory hangs on a complete ignorance of geography.
>It wouldn't exactly be a "side trip". They would have almost passed right over Cuba on the way there, and back. If they really were in Barbados at the time... then what the hell???
>"She once called Cuban dictator Fidel Castro the 'sexiest man I’ve ever met.' ”
>Source: https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/margaret-trudeau-flower-child-turned-prime-ministers-mom-ends-self-imposed-exile-from-spotlight
>"Of Fidel Castro with whom she flirted under Pierre’s nose, Maggie admits, 'He was the sexiest man I ever met.' ”
>Source: https://archive.macleans.ca/article/1979/3/5/people
>I would like to know if there is anything that can be found to flesh out the following quote from a 2014 piece in the Ottawa Citizen:
>"Thirty-eight years after that trip, Trudeau says she is celebrating the thawing of U.S.-Cuban relations along with the Cuban people, a move that was helped along through secret meetings held in Ottawa."
>Snopes has said that the Trudeaus did not meet Castro until 1976 but that timeline would appear to be in doubt if Fidel Castro was engaging in "secret meetings held in Ottawa".
>This Medium piece makes the case that for a first-time meeting in 1976 the Trudeaus seemed overly familiar with Castro. The 2014 article referenced above captures the same thing. Here's a quote:
>"Fidel made it clear in his opening remarks that the parents were important but not nearly as important as the baby. In some pictures Fidel had a big patch of wet saliva on his uniform because he had come over early to cuddle the baby.”
>Source: https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news/margaret-trudeaus-cuban-memory-the-dictator-who-cuddled-her-baby/