/b/ - Random

only the dead can know peace from this FUN


New Reply[×]
Name
Email
Subject
Message
Files Max 5 files32MB total
Tegaki
Password
Flag
[New Reply]


 Dress to impress!


49d41bd0381d11bada2f8cb4691798924c8b99ebd893f9236e958945e3c3c103.jpg
[Hide] (62.5KB, 800x532) Reverse
Why do white nationalists and national socialists uphold hypergamy and gynocentrism? At this point I'm better off racemixing with a virgin bucktoothed chink, than deal with chad's leftovers.
>>330808 (OP) 
White woman are, unfortunately, the only ones that can give us offspring that is truly related to us.
Not saying you need to consider them people.
Replies: >>330812 >>330835
>>330809
The problem is that there is a such a separation in motivations between White men and women. Its like they are living in completely different realities. I tend to blame the smart phone, naturally. But as for a solution? We all know women love to follow trends that make them feel strong and rebellious. That is essentially the answer.
>feminism is being pushed by white nationalists
kike detected
>>330808 (OP) 
u wot m8
>>330809
Egg extraction and eventual artificial wombs. Bonus point being that you don't need to deal with all of the previous mens semen stuck in her brain and the rest of her system.
Replies: >>330852 >>330858
>>330808 (OP) 
was this you, dad?
>>330808 (OP) 
tf is it that you consider gynocentrism? Having a wife?
State what it is that is bothering you.
Rothenburg_2.jpg
[Hide] (2.1MB, 1500x1000) Reverse
>>330835
I'd rather not live in an ugly, soulless dystopia. 
I'd rather live in something like this place. I want a high trust society where I can walk to work in a meaningful profession and build a society where children can play in the sun without being kidnapped by niggers or screamed at by Karens on smart phones.
Replies: >>330859
>>330835
Lol, why go through making new technology when you could just use women for shit that they don't have to consent to
Replies: >>330864
f32348f378de49f59c27c3aa339cb45aaf756c05c121931798f5d935a40bd0ab.png
[Hide] (6.2MB, 1512x2016) Reverse
>>330852
>I'd rather not live in an ugly, soulless dystopia.
<artificial wombs being made -> dystopia
Where is the logic here? "I read it in Brave New World, therefore it is so"?
>I want a high trust society
There are always those who exploit high trust societies, the question is just how many of those there are in said high trust societies. Japanese teenagers huddling around liquor fridges in konbinis, and then buying a chocolate bar to seem inconspicious, knowing that it is socially unacceptable for the staff to make a fuss about it. or the SEAmonkey/jeet staffing the konbini doesn't even give a shit
>where I can walk to work
Burger spotted, especially considering your complete lack of mention of public transport. It wouldn't be shit in the high trust society you keep jerking off about.
>a meaningful profession
Good luck with that when AI is fucking over all professions, if not now, then most certainly in the future. No, there's no market for your hand-made high quality shoes, Herr Schumacher. Everyone is too poor to afford them, because AI took their jobs and they're now on UBI, and you can't even source the materials for them in the first place because you're destitute as well. The UBI doesn't stretch that far.
>build a society where children can play in the sun
Smartphones are far more interesting to children than traditional play ever could hope to be. Six seven!! Image related, though that will quickly go the way of the dodo as well. Can't really profit from making things that are used by children, for free. Children have no money with which to consume things.
Hang on, where's that wife that you might claim that you have that you've had children with? Huh?
>without being kidnapped by niggers
Why did you leave your child(ren) unsupervised? Even in a high trust society, leaving children (you know, the ones that you don't have) unattended is a bad idea.
>or screamed at by Karens on smart phones
Much like AI, there's no putting the a lid on Pandoras box. These are going to exist everywhere, high trust or otherwise.
>image
The niggers are just out of frame.
Replies: >>330867
>>330858
>Lol, why go through making new technology when you could just use women for shit that they don't have to consent to
I'm not entirely sure what you're saying here, so my response might be off mark:
Because childbirth might fuck up the one use that I think that you're thinking of, that being sex.
Women don't like it when you point it out and will screech at you that no, the vagina stretches out and then goes back to what it was after the baby is born. That might be true, but for some, the damn thing tears, doesn't go back to what it used to be, and it might even damage their clitoral nerves so they're no longer even deriving pleasure from sex in the first place. Which might not be important to you if you're one of those people who don't even care for womens pleasure in the first place, but how fun is it to basically fuck a stretched out cavernous dungeon of a vagina?
Unless the women are genuinely excited at having a life growing inside them, and don't refer to them as "parasites growing inside their bodies", artificial wombs are the solution to everyones problems. Women don't have to suffer the trials and tribulations of pregnancy, bizarre food cravings, the numerous dangers that women face during pregnancy and the genuinely dangerous experience of childbirth. Childbirth has, since the dawn of humanity, been a source of much anguish for everyone involved.
And men can enjoy not worrying about their sex life going down the drain, and, importantly, not worry about their damn women dying on them in childbirth.
<uhhhhhh c-section o algo
Cutting someone up for any reason is also dangerous. Also, the child doesn't get a starter bacterial dose if it isn't born vaginally, so the doctors have to stick gauzes up the mothers vagina, leave them in there for a bit, and then use the gauzes to wipe the baby in various areas to get the mothers bacteria on it.
>>330859
>public transport. It wouldn't be shit in the high trust society you keep jerking off about.
Uh, yeah? That's my point?

>There are always those who exploit high trust societies
So we shoot them. What happened to exploiters back before jews imported the population of Africa into America? Exploiters were isolated from society like the disease they are. 

>What about AI?
Ban it.

>Smartphones are far more interesting to children
Ban them. Shoot parents who own them.
If parents refuse to have a brain, the state must step in and be the better father. Once the adults stop acting like retard-nigger-faggots, control may be returned.

>Even in a high trust society, leaving children (you know, the ones that you don't have) unattended is a bad idea.
Bullshit. I'm not even old and I wandered around my rural community wholly unsupervised and never once encountered danger because it was White. Now I live in an all White community and children play outside all day. No one has ever been kidnapped. This only happens in niggerfied areas.

>Karens are eternal
No. Karens exist because of low trust and social media. 

>The niggers are just out of frame
If White nationalists wielded power, they'd be underground.
Replies: >>330871
28ae0da44dba87c5dd3066fbf452e189214cf1a09d0f0515f3c045ade2688533.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 1073x1209) Reverse
>>330867
>So we shoot them.
Doesn't really line up with you wanting to isolate them later on.
>Exploiters were isolated from society like the disease they are. 
High trust societies in the way they've existed for the past century or so, the one you keep jerking off to, hasn't been around nearly as long as the concept of exiling people.
>Ban it.
Good luck with that. Pandoras box being unable to be closed and all of that, like I previously mentioned.
>Ban them.
Good luck with that. Even more difficult than above, considering that smartphones have been around for almost 20 years now.
>Shoot parents who own them.
That's a lot of parents you want to shoot. What will you do with all of the orphans?
>the state must step in and be the better father.
Sounds a little communist of you. Orphanages ran by the state usually don't turn out well.
>Once the adults stop acting like retard-nigger-faggots
That's not going to happen when you put them six feet into the ground.
>No one has ever been kidnapped.
Not the danger i was referring to; i was referring to children hurting themselves falling from heights on playgrounds and whatnot.
The fact that your mind immediately went to niggers kidnapping children is somewhat telling.
>they'd be underground
Would you really want them to pollute your soil for thousands of years to come?

>Now I live in an all White community
Now go ahead and tell the nice little glownigger where this community that you speak of is.
Replies: >>330888
>>330808 (OP) 
They do? I thought they were just basic bitch pussy sniffers
Hypergamy does not exist, bro.
d1e5b40624fc2de268f4800c3cc67187c4117cfc174b14ad850d0661aaf7eec0.png
[Hide] (2.3MB, 2500x1406) Reverse
>>330881
>>330882
and this joyeuse, is he in the room with us? do you think about him often? do you hear his voice in your mind?
>>330871
>Doesn't really line up with you wanting to isolate them later on.
Potato potato. 

>you can't just ban things
Governments around the world do. It is for the good of all that AI is destroyed.

>What will you do with all of the orphans?
Foster homes, of course. Actually decent parents who can answer the question correctly: Yes or no, is it good to addict your child to crack or a smart screen?
It's pretty easy to pass the test. Common sense.

>Sounds a little communist of you
I'm done with pretending that these nigger-faggot NPCs are capable adults. If that makes me a communist, so be it.

>falling from heights on playgrounds
Learning experience. Sorry. Besides, I used to explore abandoned houses ranging from abandoned farm houses with rotting floors to a literal mansion decaying in the woods with a fully stocked library of dusty books and gun parts on the floor. I was a pretty naive child, I think. If I could survive, anyone can.

>The fact that your mind immediately went to niggers kidnapping children is somewhat telling.
Telling of what? Are you claiming I kidnap children or that I think about niggers too much. One of these may be true.

>Now go ahead and tell the nice little glownigger where this community that you speak of is.
You already have my IP address. If you want to flood it with niggers, go ahead and try. We're really racist. Furthermore, we're extremely poor. Niggers pretend to be poor, but they cannot handle actual poverty.
[New Reply]
Connecting...
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

Select the solid/filled icons
- news - rules - faq -
jschan 1.7.3