>>330858
>Lol, why go through making new technology when you could just use women for shit that they don't have to consent to
I'm not entirely sure what you're saying here, so my response might be off mark:
Because childbirth might fuck up the one use that I think that you're thinking of, that being sex.
Women don't like it when you point it out and will screech at you that no, the vagina stretches out and then goes back to what it was after the baby is born. That might be true, but for some, the damn thing tears, doesn't go back to what it used to be, and it might even damage their clitoral nerves so they're no longer even deriving pleasure from sex in the first place. Which might not be important to you if you're one of those people who don't even care for womens pleasure in the first place, but how fun is it to basically fuck a stretched out cavernous dungeon of a vagina?
Unless the women are genuinely excited at having a life growing inside them, and don't refer to them as "parasites growing inside their bodies", artificial wombs are the solution to everyones problems. Women don't have to suffer the trials and tribulations of pregnancy, bizarre food cravings, the numerous dangers that women face during pregnancy and the genuinely dangerous experience of childbirth. Childbirth has, since the dawn of humanity, been a source of much anguish for everyone involved.
And men can enjoy not worrying about their sex life going down the drain, and, importantly, not worry about their damn women dying on them in childbirth.
<uhhhhhh c-section o algo
Cutting someone up for any reason is also dangerous. Also, the child doesn't get a starter bacterial dose if it isn't born vaginally, so the doctors have to stick gauzes up the mothers vagina, leave them in there for a bit, and then use the gauzes to wipe the baby in various areas to get the mothers bacteria on it.